1 / 11

Radio Spectrum Decision (676/2002/EC)

Radio Spectrum Decision (676/2002/EC). Michael Sharpe ETSI. Introduction. Marketing radio equipment and services CEPT/ETSI MoU Radio Spectrum Decision Role of ETSI Conclusion. Marketing radio equipment and services.

harmon
Download Presentation

Radio Spectrum Decision (676/2002/EC)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Radio Spectrum Decision(676/2002/EC) Michael Sharpe ETSI

  2. Introduction • Marketing radio equipment and services • CEPT/ETSI MoU • Radio Spectrum Decision • Role of ETSI • Conclusion GSC-8, OTTAWA

  3. Marketing radio equipment and services • Radio equipment shall meet essential requirements (R&TTE Directive 1999/5/EC) • Harmonised Standards provide presumption of conformity • Equipment shall operate within a frequency management plan GSC-8, OTTAWA

  4. Fragmentation in Europe • A single market for equipment • 15 member states • 15 national frequency plans • ...plus EEA countries... • ... ten more countries in 2004... • Fragmentation of the radio market because of spectrum concerns GSC-8, OTTAWA

  5. CEPT/ETSI MoU • ETSI produce harmonised standards to allow free movement of equipment • CEPT produce Decisions and Recommendations encouraging member states to align frequency plans • Standards development and frequency management work together • ETSI mandated for standards • CEPT mandated for frequency allocation GSC-8, OTTAWA

  6. Frequency planning in Europe • Frequency planning is still managed on a National level • ERC Recommendations and Decisions are not legally binding • National frequency planning has the potential to be a barrier to the Single Market GSC-8, OTTAWA

  7. Radio Spectrum Decision(676/2002/EC) • The Decision allows for: • Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG) • Radio Spectrum Committee (RSC) • Publication of National frequency plans • EU political support for WRC negotiations GSC-8, OTTAWA

  8. Radio Spectrum Policy Group • Cross-sector "think tank" • Identifies Community Policies where radio spectrum harmonisation measures may be necessary • Example: Encouraging access to broadband services • Example: Improvement of Road Safety • Example: Assisting people with disabilities to play a full role on society GSC-8, OTTAWA

  9. Radio Spectrum Committee • Provides mandates to CEPT for spectrum harmonisation Recommendations and Decisions • Creates Commission Decisions based on CEPT measures • Provides legal certainty to spectrum allocations in EU GSC-8, OTTAWA

  10. Role of ETSI • ETSI representative to RSPG • ETSI representative to RSC • ETSI respresentatives in CEPT working groups • ETSI members have access to CEPT drafting groups GSC-8, OTTAWA

  11. Conclusion • Equipment standardisation and spectrum management "hand in hand" • Spectrum management now linked to EU public interest policy initiatives • Community-wide spectrum allocations now have legal certainty under EC law. GSC-8, OTTAWA

More Related