310 likes | 322 Views
Explore the evolution of inequality & wage premiums, market dynamics, and policy implications in the US labor market. Analyze the rise in wage inequality, factors influencing education premiums, and the impact of supply & demand on relative wages.
E N D
The Evolution of Inequality and Relative Wages in the United States Kevin M. Murphy John von Neumann Lecture May 18, 2009
Steps in the Analysis • Understand what has happened • Understand the marketplace • Draw implications for policy
What has happened? • We will examine two aspects of the change in inequality • Changes in the returns to education • Changes in relative wages more generally
Broader Changes in Relative Wages • General wage inequality has increased along with the education premium • We can track the growth in inequality by following wages at different “places” in the wage distribution • We will follow three types of workers: • Low wage workers = 10th percentile • Middle wage workers = 50th percentile • High wage workers = 90th percentile
Bottom Line on Wage Changes • Inequality has increased greatly • Increases in inequality have been increasingly concentrated at the top of the distribution over the past 40 years • We see this with education where graduate premiums have continued to increase while college premiums have leveled off
Understanding the Market for Skill Supply & Demand
Supply & Demand • Growth in the college premium can be explained by a simple model • Model based on Katz-Murphy 1992 • The model: • Demand grows steadily over time • Fluctuations in supply cause education premiums to fluctuate • Supply grows faster than demand premium falls • Demand grows faster than supply premium rises
The Supply Response • Growth in the college premium has generated a predictable response – more people have gone on to college
Summary of Data • Education & skill premiums have increased over time • The shift in demand has been increasingly concentrated at the top of the distribution in recent years • Growth in the demand for skill is the key • Equilibrium premiums reflect the combination of supply and demand • Supply responds to price
Key Ingredients • The growth in wage inequality represents a demand-driven “price” change • Inequality and education premiums reflect a rising premium on skill • Higher returns to skill generate an incentive for more people to invest in schooling & other skills • More people going to school increases the supply of human capital
Thinking More About Inequality • There are two sides to the growth in the price of skill • An increase in inequality – many regard this as bad • An increase in the return on human capital investment • Regardless of your view on the first it would be good to take advantage of the second
The Positive Side • A greater return to human capital will increase the return to existing investments • A greater return to human capital will further increase growth by encouraging more investment in human capital • More investment will help reduce inequality through the effect of supply
What should be the policy response? • The market response to a higher premium for skill has been and will be to increase the supply of skilled workers • Increases in the supply of skill will help check the growth in inequality • This “balancing” act between supply and demand has operated throughout the 20th century
Important Issues • The growth in college graduates has lagged behind growth in the number going to college • May reflect the fact that many students are not well prepared for college • Long-run supply should be more elastic as more get prepared – but how much more? • The cost of poor preparation/schooling is higher than before greater need to improve schools & young child preparation • Education has also become more important in other areas like health
The Bottom Line • Think about growing inequality as a rise in the price of skill driven by increased skill demand = skill has become more valuable • The best response to more demand is to increase the quantity supplied • Other approaches to “addressing” the issue reduce our ability to take advantage of the higher return to human capital