100 likes | 214 Views
Global 3-D Model Analysis of TRACE-P HCN and CH 3 CN Measurements. Qinbin Li, Daniel J. Jacob, Robert M. Yantosca Harvard Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Group Hanwant B. Singh NASA Ames Research Center Makoto Koike University of Tokyo Glen W. Sachse NASA-Langley Research Center.
E N D
Global 3-D Model Analysis of TRACE-P HCN and CH3CN Measurements Qinbin Li, Daniel J. Jacob, Robert M. Yantosca Harvard Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Group Hanwant B. Singh NASA Ames Research Center Makoto Koike University of Tokyo Glen W. Sachse NASA-Langley Research Center
Atmospheric Budget of HCN(pre-TRACE-P) Li et al. [2000] Biomass burning emission ratio (relative to CO): 1.1%.
Vertical profiles in marine background atmosphere:Evidence for oceanic uptake of HCN and CH3CN Background: CO < 120 ppbv, C2Cl4 < 10 pptv Inferred saturation ratios: 0.84 for HCN, 0.80 for CH3CN
CH3CN-HCN Correlation in TRACE-P Biomass burning “Shanghai plume” (flight 13) Biofuels (?) Red: C2Cl4 > 11 pptv Blue: C2Cl4 < 11 pptv
Use HCN/CO and CH3CN/CO ratios measured in Chinese pollution plumes to infer biofuel emission ratios DC-8 Flight #13 Assuming fresh fossil fuel+biofuel emissions. CO: biofuel/(fossil fuel+biofuel) ~42% for Shanghai + Jiangsu + Zhejiang [D. Streets, 2001] . Hence HCN/CO biofuel emission ratio ~ 0.40%.
Correlations: > 2 km Emission ratios relative to CO (% molar): Asian CO emissions (March 2001): 14 Tg fossil fuel 13 Tg biofuel 59 Tg biomass burning
Simulated vs. observed vertical profiles Red: observation Blue: model Green: biomass burning Pink: biofuel Yellow (CO only): fossil fuel
Simulated vs. observed frequency distributions Red: observation Blue: model
Simulated vs. observed HCN columns Moshiri (44°N, 142°E) Rikubetsu (45°N, 144°E) Tsukuba (36°N, 140°E) Red: observation Blue: model
Atmospheric Budgets for HCN and CH3CN Li et al. [2000] in red