1 / 22

Network Analysis by Barry Wellman

Network Analysis by Barry Wellman. Three Ways to Look at Reality. Categories All Possess One or More Properties as an Aggregate of Individuals Examples: Men, Developed Countries Groups (Almost) All Densely-Knit Within Tight Boundary

harper
Download Presentation

Network Analysis by Barry Wellman

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Network Analysisby Barry Wellman

  2. Three Ways to Look at Reality • Categories • All Possess One or More Properties as an Aggregate of Individuals • Examples: Men, Developed Countries • Groups • (Almost) All Densely-Knit Within Tight Boundary • Thought of as a Solitary Unit (Really a Special Network) • Family, Workgroup, Community • Networks • Set of Connected Units: People, Organizations, Networks • Can Belong to Multiple Networks • Examples: Friendship, Organizational, Inter-, World-System, Internet

  3. Nodes, Relationships & Ties • Nodes: A Unit That Possibly is Connected • Individuals, Households, Groups, Organizations, States • Relationships (A Specific Type of Connection) • Gives Emotional Support • Sends Money To • Attacks • Ties (One or More Relationships) • Friendship (with possibly many relationships)

  4. A Network is More Than The Sum of Its Ties • A Network Consists of One or More Nodes • Could be Persons, Organizations, Groups, Nations • Connected by One or More Ties • Could be One or More Relationships • That Form Distinct, Analyzable Patterns • Can Study Patterns of Relationships OR Ties

  5. Overview - Journals • Wellman founded, Connections, 1977 • Informal journal: “Useful” articles, news, gossip, grants, abstracts, book summaries • Bill Richards, Tom Valente edit now • Lin Freeman founded, Social Networks, 1978 • Formal journal: Refereed articles • Ronald Breiger now co-editor • David Krackhardt founded, J of Social Structure, 2000 • Online, Refereed • Lots of visuals • Articles Appear Occasionally when their time has come

  6. Overview – Key Books • Elizabeth Bott, Family & Social Network, 1957 • J. Clyde Mitchell, Networks, Norms & Institutions, 1973 • Holland & Leinhardt, Perspectives on Social Network Research,1979 • S. D. Berkowitz, An Introduction to Structural Analysis, 1982 • Knoke & Kuklinski, Network Analysis, 1983 • Charles Tilly, Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons, 1984 • David Knoke, Political Networks, 1990 • John Scott, Social Network Analysis, 1991 • Ron Burt, Structural Holes, 1992 • Manuel Castells, The Rise of Network Society, 1996, 2000 • Wasserman & Faust, Social Network Analysis, 1992 • Nan Lin, Social Capital (monograph & reader), 2001 • Monge & Contractor, Theories of Communication Networks, 2003

  7. Overview – Software • UCINet – Whole Network Analysis • MultiNet – Whole Network Analysis • P*Star – Dyadic Analysis • Krackplot – Network Visualization • Pajek – Network Visualization • Personal Network Analysis • SPSS/SAS – See Wellman, et al. “How To…” papers

  8. The Social Network Approach • The world is composed of networks - not densely-knit, tightly-bounded groups • Networks provide flexible means of social organization and of thinking about social organization • Networks have emergent properties of structure and composition • Networks are a major source of social capital mobilizable in themselves and from their contents • Networks are self-shaping and reflexive • Networks scale up to networks of networks

  9. Networked Individualism • Moving from a society bound up in little boxes to a multiple network – and networking – society • Networks are a flexible means of social organization • Networks are a major source of social capital: mobilizable in themselves & from their contents • Networks link: • Persons • Within organizations • Between organizations and institutions

  10. Little Boxes Glocalization Networked Individualism Barry Wellman co-editor Social Structure: A Network ApproachJAI-Elsevier Press 1998

  11. Ways of Looking at Networks • Whole Networks & Personal Networks • Focus on the System or on the Set of Individuals • Graphs & Matrices • We dream in graphs • We analyze in matrices

  12. Whole Social Networks • Comprehensive Set of Role Relationships in a Full System • Analyze Each Role Relationship – Can Combine • Composition: % Women; Heterogeneity; % Weak Ties • Structure: Pattern of Ties • Village, Organization, Kinship, Enclaves, World-System • Typical Methods: Cliques, Blocks, Centrality, Flows • (1)What is the Real Structure of an Organization? • (2) How Does Information Flow Through a Village?

  13. Duality of Persons & Groups • People Link Groups • Groups Link People • An Interpersonal Net is an Interorganizational Net • Ronald Breiger 1973

  14. The Dualities of Persons and Groups -- Graphs

  15. Dualities of Persons and Groups -- Matrices

  16. Dualities of Persons and Groups: Event-Event Matrix

  17. Neat Whole Network Methods • QAP • Regression of Matrices • Example: Co-Citation (Intellectual Tie) Predicts Better than Friendship (Social Tie) To Inter-Citation • Clustering: High Density; Tight Boundaries (“Groups”) • Block Modeling • Similar Role Relationships, Not Necessarily Clusters • Canada & Mexico in Same Block – US Dominated

  18. Erickson, 1988: From a Matrix > . . .

  19. . . . To a Block Model

  20. Costs of Whole Network Analysis • Requires a Roster of Entire Population • Requires (Imposition of) a Social Boundary • This May Assume What You Want to Find • Hard to Handle Missing Data • Needs Special Analytic Packages • Becoming Easier to Use

  21. Personal Social Networks • Ptolemaic Ego-Centered View • Good for Unbounded Networks • Often Uses Survey Research • Example: • (1)Do Densely-Knit Networks Provide More Support? (structure) • (2) Do More Central People Get More Support?(network) • (2) Do Women Provide More Support? (composition) • (3) Do Face-to-Face Ties Provide More Support Than Internet Ties? (relational) • (4) Are People More Isolated Now? (ego)

More Related