340 likes | 353 Views
This work compares the Geant4 simulation with the distributions observed in BFEM data for various particle fluxes and angular distributions. The study also includes the comparison of hits in each layer and the reconstruction of charged and neutral particles.
E N D
Geant4 for GLAST BFEM • Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – • T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, S. Ogata, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima/SLAC) • M. Roterman, P. Valtersson (Royal Inst. of Tech/SLAC) • M. Ozaki (ISAS), • T. Handa, B. Giebels, T. Kamae (SLAC) • (Note) • This work is in progress and hence the report is preliminary. • (Contents) • Hit distributions in BFEM • Two Cosmic Ray Models: with and without 0.6*sin(theta) term in albedo fluxes • Summary
Geant4 Simulation for BFEM – A Chart • CR Generator • Primary p, e-, g • Uniform angular distribution • Secondary p, e-,e+,m+,m- • Angular distribution proportional to 1+ 0.6*sin(theta) • Uniform angular distribution (Steve Ritz’s choice) • Secondary g • Angular distribution adjusted to Schoenfelder et al. • Physics Simulation (The fixes not implemented yet) • Digitization (w/charge sharing, w/o noise) • Conversion to IRF File • ROOTWriter (Thanks to Heather) • Analysis (Presented here) • Reconstruction (Yet to be done)
BFEM L1T Rate (G4 vs Real) for the Level Flight Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component Total G4 L1T: 517 Hz. (Real data: ~500 Hz) contribution proton: 219 Hz e-: 77.9 Hz e+: 46.2 Hz gamma: 89.0 Hz mu-: 32.8 Hz mu+: 52.7 Hz Neutral: 54.8 Hz. (real data: ~50 Hz) contribution proton: 5.14 Hz e-: 8.09 Hz e+: 4.68 Hz gamma: 34.4 Hz mu-: 1.09 Hz mu+: 1.42 Hz
Hits in each layer (G4 vs Real) for “charged” particles Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component Data G4
Hits in each layer (G4) for all “charged” particle species Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component
Tot no. of layers hit (G4 vs Real) for “charged” particles Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component G4 Data
Top-most layer hit (G4 vs Real) for “charged” particles Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component Data G4
Hits in each layer (G4 vs Real) for “neutral” particles Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component G4 Data
Hits in each layer (G4) for all “neutral” particle species Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component
Tot no. of layers hit (G4 vs Real) for “neutral” particles Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component G4 Data
Top-most layer hit (G4 vs Real) for “neutral” particles Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component Data G4
Study on CR protons and muons Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component • We primarily want to find protons and muons. As these particles normally have • straight tracks we can apply the following cuts: • Chi square of < 0.01 • Hit in ACD panels • Single tracks only • Number of hits in tracker layers • As we have missing silicon in top part of tracker we only look at bottom 16 layers. • The above cuts does not include interactions as they produce several recon tracks.
Study on CR protons and muons: Top ACD and 8 layers Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component MC Protons = Red MC Muons (- & +) = Yellow BFEM data = blue
Study on CR protons and muons: All ACD and 8 layers Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component MC Protons = Red MC Muons (- & +) = Yellow BFEM data = blue
Study on CR protons and muons: All ACD and 4 layers Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component MC Protons = Red MC Muons (- & +) = Yellow BFEM data = blue
Study on CR protons and muons: All side ACD and 4 layers Sharper earth rim with sin(theta) albedo component MC Protons = Red MC Muons (- & +) = Yellow BFEM data = blue
BFEM L1T Rate (G4 vs Real) for the Level Flight Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component Total L1T: 448 Hz. (real data: ~500 Hz) contribution proton: 210 Hz e-: 53.7 Hz e+: 32.2 Hz gamma: 89.0 Hz mu-: 22.7 Hz mu+: 40.7 Hz Neutral: 50.1 Hz. (real data: ~50 Hz) contribution proton: 4.55 Hz e-: 5.24 Hz e+: 3.46 Hz gamma: 34.4 Hz mu-: 0.609 Hz mu+: 1.85 Hz
Hits in each layer (G4 vs Real) for “charged” particles Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component Data G4
Hits in each layer (G4) for all “charged” particle species Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component
Tot no. of layers hit (G4 vs Real) for “charged” particles Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component Data G4
Top-most layer hit (G4 vs Real) for “charged” particles Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component Data G4
Hits in each layer (G4 vs Real) for “neutral” particles Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component Data G4
Hits in each layer (G4) for all “neutral” particle species Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component
Tot no. of layers hit (G4 vs Real) for “neutral” particles Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component G4 Data
Top-most layer hit (G4 vs Real) for “neutral” particles Sharper earth rim without sin(theta) albedo component Data G4
Conclusion: Geant4 for BFEM • Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – • (Note) • This work is in progress and hence the report is preliminary. • (Conclusion) • Hit distributions are a powerful way to study the CR composition and angular distribution. • More soft electrons/positrons(E< 20MeV?) to fill the lower portion of the Tracker. • Sharpness of the Earth Rim (as a source of soft gamma rays): BFEM may give a useful measurement! • Strength of the sin(theta) component: BFEM may give a constraint!.