180 likes | 199 Views
Government Structure and Federalism. Frank Brooks. The Constitution as a Contract. Lays out key elements of government purposes structure powers limits Effectiveness v. safeguards Skeletal framework, not detailed blueprint Constitution is vague, “inspired ambiguity”
E N D
Government Structure and Federalism Frank Brooks Introduction to American Politics
The Constitution as a Contract • Lays out key elements of government • purposes • structure • powers • limits • Effectiveness v. safeguards • Skeletal framework, not detailed blueprint • Constitution is vague, “inspired ambiguity” • provides flexibility and stability • channels conflict into “political” channels
Powers: Formal and Evolved • Formal, constitutional powers • Congress (Article 1) • President (Article 2) • Supreme Court (Article 3) • Informal, evolved powers • Congress – “necessary and proper clause” (elastic) • Supreme Court – judicial review • President – “inherent” (implied) powers • Many rooted in “commander in chief” authority • Capacity to lead nation enhanced by technology • Development of national constituencies and interests “To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.” (Article I, Section 8)
Limits on National Government • Constitutional Limits • Amendment Process • channels policy change into political channels • Separation of Powers; Checks and Balances • Decentralize power by separating it • Encourage competition between power centers • Federalism • Acknowledge and define role of state and local governments as counterweight
Amending the Constitution • Proposal • By 2/3 vote of both houses of Congress (A) • By 2/3 of state legislatures calling for a convention (B) • Ratification • By ¾ of state legislatures (C) • By ¾ of state ratifying conventions (D) • History of amendment • Only 27 (17 since Bill of Rights) • AC route for all but one • Difficulty of amendment channels policy change to Congress, executive branch, even courts
Separation of Powers • Three branches; four significant parts • Congress • House • Senate • Presidency; Executive Branch • Courts • Three kinds of separation into those four parts • Function • Constituency • Term
Separation by Function • House • Legislative • Spending • Senate • Legislative • Executive: approve nominations, ratify treaties • President • Executive • Foreign relations • Courts • Judicial • Interpret Constitution
Separation by Constituency • House • Chosen by voters in Congressional districts • Narrowest representation, most accountability • Senate • Chosen by states (legislatures, then voters) • More heterogeneous constituency than House • President • “National” constituency (distorted by electoral college) • Court • Federal judges chosen by President and Senate • “represent” the Constitution (defend it against threats)
Separation by Term • House • 2 years, no term limits • Senate • 6 years (staggered), no term limits • President • 4 years, 2 term limit (after 22nd Amendment) • Court • “life” term • Cannot gain control of all the government all at the same time “shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour” (Article 3, Section 1)
Checks and Balances • Consider FDR’s court-packing scheme • Separation of powers may slow down concentration of power, but can’t stop it • “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition” • Assume that office-holders need/want power • Give each part tools to interfere with other parts • Let competition among parts limit overall power, or at least ensure that power used appropriately • Broad impact of checks and balances • enforce separation • compel cooperation and compromise
Federalism • Separation of power between levels of government • Historical context • shift of power away from states • But, left them considerable authority • Complex subject (abstract to concrete) • Structure of relationship between states & federal • How the Constitution describes terms of relationship • Interpretation of Constitutional language • Politics of relationship (especially money)
Structure of Federalism • Unitary Government • Confederal Government • Federal Government
Federalism in the Constitution • “National Supremacy” Clause (Article 6) • Seems to favor national government • Anti-Federalists sought clarification/dilution • Tenth Amendment • National government has “delegated” powers • E.g. regulate interstate commerce, raise army • Only those explicitly mentioned in Constitution? • States governments have “reserved” powers • Residual category (after powers prohibited to states) • Includes “police” powers, education This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Interpreting Federalism • Need for Interpretation • National Supremacy clause and 10th Amendment potentially contradictory • Specific meaning of “delegated” and “reserved” unclear • Supreme Court resolves • McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) • If both state and federal government exercise legitimate power, which prevails? • Elastic clause + national supremacy clause = national government wins
Interpretations of the Commerce Clause • How much power was conferred by Congress’ power to “regulate interstate commerce”? • Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) • “commerce” broad; “interstate” narrow • 1830s-1930s – commerce power interpreted narrowly to limit Congressional power • Jones v. NLRB (1937) • Virtually all commerce is “interstate” • Greatly expanded Congressional power
The Politics of Federalism • Dual federalism • Dominant until 1930s • States and national government had distinct, separate realms (depending on functions) • Cooperative federalism • States and national government cooperate • Often, national government funds, while states implement • Regulatory federalism • National government sets conditions for funding and thus regulates state actions • Unpopular with states • “New” federalism, devolution, states’ rights
Funding Federalism • Categorical and Project Grants • Money appropriated for specific purposes • Local governments and organizations write grant proposals • States often circumvented • Block grants • Broad purposes, e.g. economic development • Only about 10% of federal funding • Revenue Sharing • States get proportional “share” of taxes collected by federal government to spend on any purpose