290 likes | 389 Views
Middle-aged Sun 4.6 Billion years old. http://www.windows.ucar.edu/sun/Solar_interior/Nuclear_Reactions/Fusion/dt_fusion.gif. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sun_Life.png. http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/exhibitions/energy/site/EIZCaseStudy18Item2.asp.
E N D
Middle-aged Sun 4.6 Billion years old http://www.windows.ucar.edu/sun/Solar_interior/Nuclear_Reactions/Fusion/dt_fusion.gif http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sun_Life.png http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/exhibitions/energy/site/EIZCaseStudy18Item2.asp
A faint young sun ~4 billion years ago the sun was 70% as luminous as today The Faint Young Sun Paradox. Solid line is solar luminosity relative to present (S/S0). Ts is Earth’s surface temperature and Te is Earth’s effective radiating temperature. Thick vertical bars are glaciations. SOURCE: Modified from Kasting and Catling (2003). http://www.nap.edu/books/0309095069/html/64.html
http://www.resa.net/nasa/images/mars/stromatolites.jpg http://www.scotese.com/images/precamb_events.jpg
The Faint Young Sun Paradox. Solid line is solar luminosity relative to present (S/S0). Ts is Earth’s surface temperature and Te is Earth’s effective radiating temperature. Thick vertical bars are glaciations. SOURCE: Modified from Kasting and Catling (2003). Less solar radiation (70 W/m2) so Earth should be frozen, BUT it wasn’t! http://www.nap.edu/books/0309095069/html/64.html
The Faint Young Sun Paradox. Solid line is solar luminosity relative to present (S/S0). Ts is Earth’s surface temperature and Te is Earth’s effective radiating temperature. Thick vertical bars are glaciations. SOURCE: Modified from Kasting and Catling (2003). Less solar radiation (70 W/m2 less) so Earth should be frozen, BUT it wasn’t! What compensated for the Weak radiation (heat)? http://www.nap.edu/books/0309095069/html/64.html
The Faint Young Sun Paradox. Solid line is solar luminosity relative to present (S/S0). Ts is Earth’s surface temperature and Te is Earth’s effective radiating temperature. Thick vertical bars are glaciations. SOURCE: Modified from Kasting and Catling (2003). Less solar radiation (70 W/m2 less) so Earth should be frozen, BUT it wasn’t! What compensated for the Weak radiation (heat)? Compensation ONCompensation OFF http://www.nap.edu/books/0309095069/html/64.html
Heat from below – Geothermal heat http://www.huxley.ic.ac.uk/Local/EarthSciUG/ESFirstYr/EarthMaterials/mrpalmer/EarthMaterials/earth/earth1/f4.gif
Heat from below – Geothermal heat 0.3 W/m2 more heat…. Not enough to make up for 70 W/m2 less solar heat. Maybe enough to keep the deep ocean from freezing. http://www.huxley.ic.ac.uk/Local/EarthSciUG/ESFirstYr/EarthMaterials/mrpalmer/EarthMaterials/earth/earth1/f4.gif
What about albedo? Was it much lower in Earth’s early history?
What about albedo? Was it much lower in Earth’s early history?
Redistribute the Carbon – put more Carbon in atm
Super greenhouse world
Super greenhouse world But where did all the atm CO2 go?
So where did the CO2 come from that isn’t still supplying it at the same rate today?
So where did the CO2 come from that isn’t still supplying it at the same rate today?
So early Earth had more volcanic outgassing. Why didn’t the CO2 that was emitted early on just build up in atm? Must be more to the story…. Is anything removing the atm CO2 that didn’t before? Carbon in the Earth
Super greenhouse world Earliest life
Super greenhouse world Earliest life
Once the continents are built then they can be chemically weathered – this removes atm CO2
Long Term Climate Thermostat = Chemical weathering of continents What type of feedback is this?
So volcanic outgassing was the main input of CO2 in early Earth and chemical weathering was the main drawdown of atm CO2. limestones
The Faint Young Sun Paradox. Solid line is solar luminosity relative to present (S/S0). Ts is Earth’s surface temperature and Te is Earth’s effective radiating temperature. Thick vertical bars are glaciations. SOURCE: Modified from Kasting and Catling (2003).
What about life? What role did it play in atmospheric evolution of Earth?