1 / 8

MANAGING U.S. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES

MANAGING U.S. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES. Weldon Ihrig University of Washington July, 2008. UW Current F&A Rates (effective July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2009). Organized Research Rates: On-campus: 56% Off-campus: 26% South Lake Union: 66%

hasad-dean
Download Presentation

MANAGING U.S. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MANAGING U.S. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES Weldon Ihrig University of Washington July, 2008

  2. UW Current F&A Rates(effective July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2009) • Organized Research Rates: • On-campus: 56% • Off-campus: 26% • South Lake Union: 66% • Regional Primate Center: A (44%) and A+B (75%) • Applied Physics Laboratory: 17% • Vessels: 25% (salary base) • Instruction Rates: • On-campus: 58% • Off-campus: 26% Weldon Ihrig, University of Washington

  3. UW On-campus F&A Rate Components Weldon Ihrig, University of Washington

  4. F&A costs source of revenue • For FY 2006-2007, awarded grant and contracts exceeded $1 billion(US). • For FY 2006-2007, F&A recovery was ~$189 million(US): • ~48% distributed to pay facilities costs • ~31% distributed to fund departmental RCR • ~20% used for other general administrative and library costs (from Office of Research Facilities and Administrative Rate Primer http://www.washington.edu/research/4researchers/fa.php) Weldon Ihrig, University of Washington

  5. UW negotiated vs calculated F&A rates • Negotiated on-campus rate: 56% • Calculated on-campus rate: ~61% (administrative costs calculated ~31% versus 26% cap) • If 61% rate applied in FY 2007, recovery estimated to have increased by almost $19 million(US) Weldon Ihrig, University of Washington

  6. What works for universities? • Competitive awards without politics • Single Federal indirect cost rate applied to all agencies • Rate based upon demonstrated prior indirect cost expenditures by the universities • Research opportunities enhances graduate & undergraduate student experiences Weldon Ihrig, University of Washington

  7. Areas for Improvement • Remove 26% cap on administrative costs rate • Prohibit attempts by Federal agencies to cap indirect costs they will pay • Consistent interpretations of A-21 rules among regions & reduce complexities • Exclude university cost sharing in calculating rate • Negotiations based upon cost components data, not bottom line target Weldon Ihrig, University of Washington

  8. Cautions for universities • Indirect costs recovered are for expenditures incurred, not “free money” • Risk of over investment in facilities assuming growth in research • Universities must comply with the A-21 rules to avoid political interventions • Growth in research requires investment in support services & modernization of facilities • Fully loaded charge-out rate option for private foundations/businesses Weldon Ihrig, University of Washington

More Related