220 likes | 378 Views
Standards Issues in Agricultural Development. Lawrence Busch R. James Bingen Craig Harris Thomas Reardon Institute for Food and Agricultural Standards Michigan State University Paper presented at USAID Washington, February 2000. Why should we be concerned about standards?.
E N D
Standards Issues in Agricultural Development Lawrence Busch R. James Bingen Craig Harris Thomas Reardon Institute for Food and Agricultural Standards Michigan State University Paper presented at USAID Washington, February 2000
Why should we be concerned about standards? • New rules for global trade • Differentiation of demand • New economic opportunities • New economic constraints • Potential for supply disruptions • Potential for democracy
What I will talk about ... • What are standards for? • What is at stake • Negotiating standards • Market Access • Outcomes • Where we go from here • Benefits
What are standards? • Standards: Measures by which products, processes and producers are judged • Grades: Categories used to implement standards • Standards are… • for people and things • ubiquitous • therefore ignored
What are standards for? • Reducing transaction costs • Transparency • Coupling • Functionality • Ensure well-being
What are standards for? • Rules of the game • Strategies • Equity/Social Justice
What is at stake for agricultural development? • Participation in global markets by • firms • nations • Disruption of commodity flows • Building economic infrastructure • Cultural identities • Fairness and equity
Negotiating Standards • Who gets to participate? • Do some actors dominate? • Who gets to vote? • How are standards modified? But negotiation continues throughout the process...
Standards and Market Access • Who can participate? • Who is excluded? • What biases are introduced by the standard? • Can this be changed?
What are the outcomes? • Who benefits? • Who loses? • Are risks acceptable? • What third party effects? • What impact on environment? • Impacts on other standards?
Standards Formation Industry leaders Trade associations Government agencies NGOs Quality, Food Safety, Environment & Labor Standard Setting and Negotiation Process
What This Means • Chain is only as strong as weakest link • Attention must be paid to standards across the subsector • Standards may conflict, e.g., environmental and quality standards Let’s look at some examples...
Example 1:US Soybeans • Foreign matter in US soybeans debated for >50 years • Millions of $ rest on 1% trash • Reputations of farmers, elevator operators, exporters, processors, retailers rest on 1% trash
Example 2:Chinese Rapeseed • China wants to export canola-type rapeseed oil • Establishes standards for seed, grain, oil, etc. • Builds modern processing facilities • Project fails for lack of price differential at elevator • No incentive to meet standard
Example 3:Malian Mangoes • President Chamber of Agriculture of Mali attempted to import Malian mangoes • Malian phytosanitary certificates obtained • Product rejected at US port of entry • Did not meet US phytosanitary standards
Lessons Learned • One link was sufficient to cause a problem • Incomplete strategies: did not look at each CSP • In Malian case, quality and environmental standards conflicted So what is needed to promote profitable, fair and equitable agricultural development?
What is needed?Education about ... • Who are the actors? • What are their roles? • How do nations and the civil sector participate? • What are the rules? • How can standards be used strategically?
WTO de facto enforcement International standards Codex Alimentarius OECD IPPC OIE UNECE Industrialized nations’ standards United States European Union Others Corporate de facto standards What is needed? Education about standards
Who needs education? • Government ministries • Regulatory agencies • Input producers • Farmers • Transporters • Processors • Retailers • Consumers
What else is needed? • Greater transparency • Fair implementation of standards • nationally • internationally • Voice for developing nations, consumers • Equivalence of processes, tests • Help in meeting international norms
Benefits • Smoother flow of traded goods • Greater fairness in international trade • Improved quality, safety • Better environment • Strengthened democratic processes nationally and internationally