110 likes | 273 Views
ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL PENALTIES. A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach. Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/environment/civil-penalty/. What is a Civil Penalty?. The traditional civil/criminal distinction
E N D
ENVIRONMENTALCIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/environment/civil-penalty/
What is a Civil Penalty? • The traditional civil/criminal distinction • Crime and punishment • “A middle system of law” • What it is not... A discretionary monetary sum, imposed flexibly under civil law, achieving deterrence and reparation Civil Penalty
Regulatory Difficulties Current Compliance through discretion and consensus, but… Over-reliance on criminal prosecution and strict liability Trivialisation of offences and inadequate fines Regulator reluctance to enforce? Optimal A more proportionate and responsive approach to regulation
Current Use of Civil Penalties Abroad • “Second order violations” • Benefits recapture • BEN and SEPs • “Inflation” of the criminal law • Ordnungswidrigkeiten • The Öztürk case Germany USA
Current Use of Civil Penalties in the UK • Variety of models – growing interest • Limitations of fixed penalties – inflexible • OFT – CA 1988 and CAT • Human Rights – Article 6 “criminal charges”
Benefits from Environmental Civil Penalties • Preserves the value of the criminal law • Relieves pressure on regulators’ resources • Improved understanding and compliance • Ability to target financial gains and losses • Addresses increased public expectations Greater Flexibility Better match between the sanction and moral/financial costs of the offence,leading to improved compliance Result
A Possible Model Who? • Environment Agency What? • IPPC, waste and water How? • Discretion • Appeals When? • Initial limited use • Later review and extension
Report Conclusion • Current system: room for improvement • Experience of civil penalties: pragmatic and effective • Regulators and regulated: potentially favourable Outcome Better regulation and a better environment
Reactions • Environment Agency • Environmental Audit Committee • Government (BRTF) • Defra • Hampton Report • New legislation - Clean Neighbourhoods and Water Industry UKELA? Model? Industry/NGO/public feedback? Lobbying?
Issues for Discussion • Regulatory fit –alternative or replacement? • Type of offences –low-level and/or high level? • Which regulator(s) – EA, EN, local authorities • Assessing penalty – standard tariff and/or discretionary factors? • Limits on discretion – statutory cap? not > criminal fine? • Means of appeal – Magistrates, SoS, ET? plus limited JR? • Which parties liable – companies, individuals, directors? • Resources – additional funding and/or hypothecation? Consensus? On the principle? On the detail?
ENVIRONMENTALCIVIL PENALTIES A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach Michael Woods Senior Associate Stephenson Harwood michael.woods@shlegal.com www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/environment/civil-penalty/