1 / 10

Measuring improvement in outcomes for children and young people

Measuring improvement in outcomes for children and young people. Ruth Talbot and Jim Magee Knowledge for Improvement project, DfES. Knowledge for Improvement project. Knowledge needs –reviewing the way we measure progress against the ECM outcomes and aims

hawa
Download Presentation

Measuring improvement in outcomes for children and young people

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring improvement in outcomes for children and young people Ruth Talbot and Jim Magee Knowledge for Improvement project, DfES

  2. Knowledge for Improvement project • Knowledge needs –reviewing the way we measure progress against the ECM outcomes and aims • Knowledge management – improving the way we collect, use and analyse knowledge – now and in the future [‘We’ refers to the whole ECM: CfC programme, at a national, regional and local level] I

  3. Why bother? • Outcomes and aims are very powerful • But feedback suggests there are problems with the indicators beneath them: • Many are not outcome-focused • Many are not available at a local level • Uneven coverage across the outcomes • Uneven coverage across the age ranges

  4. How can we improve? The KfI project is proposing 4 linked pieces of work: • Develop a set of ‘descriptors’ to clarify the aims and highlight their most important aspects • Use the descriptors to develop a more complete set of population indicators • Work with inspectorates and local authorities to refine the existing set of performance measures • Ensure that quality data is available to underpin the indicators and measures and allow breakdown of outcomes for vulnerable groups

  5. Principles (1) • Indicators and measures must meet the needs of central government, local areas and inspectorates – all stakeholders should be involved in their development

  6. Principles (2) • Indicators and measures should be available at a national and local level • The set should be as small as possible – e.g. one indicator per descriptor • They are focused on outcomes rather than processes (like the aims) • They are applicable to all children and young people (like the aims)

  7. Population indicators We are developing possible indicators which will be assessed for: • Communication Power: Does the indicator communicate to a broad and diverse audience? • Proxy Power: Does the indicator say something of central importance about the descriptor? • Data Power: Is quality data available on a timely basis at a national and local level?

  8. Key challenges • Using national surveys to provide local level results • Unpicking data for all children and young people in order to identify the position for vulnerable groups

  9. Workshop • Response to proposed methodology, including: • how to achieve a set of measures which balances outcome-focused population indicators (the 'what' of performance) and service-level performance indicators (the 'why'); • what other data LAs need to manage services; • Comments on descriptors; • Views of attendees on how to respond to key challenges.

  10. Contact Details Ruth.Talbot@dfes.gsi.gov.uk Jim.Magee@dfes.gsi.gov.uk

More Related