1 / 38

Mesoscale Gravity Waves

Mesoscale Gravity Waves. MEA 444 January 20, 2005. Outline. Gravity Wave Theory Overview Numerical Model Description Synoptic Overview Uccellini and Koch (1987) Synoptic Pattern Surface & 300mb Generation Mechanisms Moist Convection Geostrophic Adjustment Shearing Instability.

hayley-hill
Download Presentation

Mesoscale Gravity Waves

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mesoscale Gravity Waves MEA 444 January 20, 2005

  2. Outline • Gravity Wave Theory Overview • Numerical Model Description • Synoptic Overview • Uccellini and Koch (1987) Synoptic Pattern • Surface & 300mb • Generation Mechanisms • Moist Convection • Geostrophic Adjustment • Shearing Instability

  3. Mesoscale Gravity Waves • As defined by Uccellini and Koch 1987: • Either a singular wave of depression or a wave packet with these characteristics: • Horizontal wavelength 50-500 km • Wave period 1-4 hours • Surface Pressure Perturbation 0.2-12 mb

  4. Rossby Adjustment Theory

  5. Internal Gravity Waves • Wave disturbances in which the restoring force of buoyancy acts on parcels displaces from hydrostatic equilibrium. • Unlike external waves, internal waves can propagate vertically. • Vertical wind shear can also destabilize parcels. • Coriolis effects can alter wave frequency and phase characteristics if period of wave is long enough (gravity-inertia waves)

  6. Wave Tilt • Note:

  7. Wave Groups

  8. a means exists to prevent energy loss: Wave ducting Wave over-reflection a means exists to provide wave energy: Shearing instability Wave-CISK Vertical Propagation Mesoscale gravity waves will become incoherent quickly due to vertical energy propagation unless:

  9. Wave Duct • Highly reflective wave duct created by combined temperature structure and critical levels (Lindzen and Tung 1976) • Phase speed of a ducted wave relative to the mean flow: n = order of wave mode *Note: Duct properties determine wave phase speed.

  10. Wave Duct Requirements • Requirements for highly reflective wave duct: • Statically stable lower layer • Duct thick enough to accommodate λz/4 for given CDUCT. • No critical level in duct which could absorb wave energy. • Critical level with low Ri in upper layer with conditional instability.

  11. Event Overview • At 1700 UTC on 12 December 2002, a large amplitude gravity wave developed over central Texas. • It accompanied a cyclone toward the East Coast, and in the process it reorganized precipitation into band-like formations and produced gusty surface winds, ranging from 20 to 35 ms-1, across the southeastern U.S.

  12. Large Amplitude Gravity Wave Defn. • Bosart et al. (1998) defined a large amplitude gravity wave as one which displayed: • Amplitudes of 3-6 hPa • Wavelengths of 100-200 km • Phase speeds of 15-35 ms-1 • Durations of at least 2-3 hours.

  13. Observations – Pressure

  14. Observations - Wind Profiler

  15. Observations - Pressure

  16. Observations - Wind Profiler

  17. Observations - Pressure

  18. UK87 Synoptic Pattern • Uccellini and Koch (1987) found a common synoptic pattern among gravity wave events: • 300 mb ridge axis to the northeast • 300 mb inflection axis to the southwest • Surface warm or stationary front to the south

  19. In Addition…. • Uccellini and Koch (1987) noted that the synoptic pattern was not sufficient by itself for gravity wave development. • There also needed to be a jet streak propagating away from the upper-level trough and toward the inflection axis in the height field.

  20. Lower Levels • The key element in the lower levels of the atmosphere was the baroclinic zone located along the Gulf Coast, extending eastward from southern Texas. 850 mb Temperature (C), Height (m), Wind (m/s)

  21. 300 mb • The ridge/trough amplification resulting in increased flow curvature. • Inflection axis in the height field over central Texas. • Propagation of a jet streak toward northeastern Texas and away from the trough axis. 300 mb Isotachs (kts), Height (m), Wind (m/s)

  22. Just To Note….. • The gravity wave developed in a region with: • Surface warm front to the south • 300 mb ridge axis to the northeast • 300 mb inflection axis to the southwest • Jet streak propagating away from 300 mb trough • Thus, it satisfied the Uccellini and Koch (1987) gravity wave synoptic situation.

  23. Gravity Wave Generation • Three gravity wave generation mechanisms were examined: • Moist Convection • Geostrophic Adjustment • Shearing Instability

  24. Moist Convection • There is still no real consensus as to what role moist convection plays in gravity wave formation. • Some have shown that convection is an important source for gravity wave generation (Lin and Goff, 1988; Powers and Reed, 1993) • Others found that gravity waves can trigger convection. (Zhang and Fritsch, 1988)

  25. Moist Convection • Moist convection seems to have played two roles in the gravity wave generation: • Altering of the synoptic environment which increased the upper-level divergence and enhanced the geostrophic adjustment process. • Actual generation of the gravity wave .

  26. Moist Convection • Precipitation developed over southern Texas just before 1200 UTC.

  27. Sutcliffe’s Self-Development • As time progressed, a pattern of Sutcliffe’s Self-Development Concept developed. • Latent heat release • Pressure ridge increase • Slowed ridge progression • Trough deepening • Increased flow curvature • Jet streak acceleration due to mass evacuation Moist convection resulted in increased upper-level curvature in the flow and along-stream flow accelerations toward northeastern Texas.

  28. Moist Convection Generation • Wave generation occurred as the intensifying convection encountered the low-level statically stable air just west of Austin, TX. • Since the convection displaced air parcels vertically, the atmosphere was "out of balance" because a component of the displacement was horizontal due to convection. • Thus, the large amplitude gravity wave developed in an attempt to restore the atmosphere to balance.

  29. Balanced Flow • Within a balanced flow system, cross-stream ageostrophic motions are directed toward the anticyclonic (right) side of a jet, which creates the upper-level of the thermally indirect circulation perpendicular to the jet exit region. • This cross-stream arrangement, determined by the equation dV/dt = fVag x k, is the result of air parcel deceleration in the jet exit region, causing kinetic energy to be converted into available potential energy.

  30. Unbalanced Flow • When the cross-stream ageostrophic motions in the jet exit region are directed toward the cyclonic (left) side of the jet, it implies that air parcels are actually accelerating in the leftward cross-stream direction rather than decelerating in the rightward cross-stream direction. • Therefore, the air parcels unable to accomplish the energy conversions required to maintain the atmosphere in a state of balance. Vag

  31. Geostrophic Adjustment • Uccellini et al. (1984) found that unbalanced ageostrophic motions occurred in a case in which a jet streak approached a mass ridge as a jet propagated downstream from the location of the geostrophic jet. • Thus, an air parcel in the exit region of the geostrophic jet found itself in the entrance region of the actual jet. • This led to unbalanced ageostrophic winds in the exit region of a geostrophic wind maximum, as defined by the cross-stream ageostrophic flow directed toward the cyclonic side of the jet. V Ф-1 Vag Ф Vg Ф+1

  32. Geostrophic Adjustment • Uccellini et al. (1984) also found Rossby numbers of Ro > 0.9 located in the exit region of the geostrophic jet. • Zack and Kaplan implemented a nonlinear balance equation (NBE = ) and found that “significantly” large values (~10-8 s-2) indicated the location of gravity wave genesis.

  33. Ageostrophic Motions • Separation occurred between the actual and geostrophic jets as the actual jet propagated downstream of the trough axis. • Conforming to the Uccellini et al. (1984) study, ageostrophic flow became oriented toward the cyclonic side of the geostrophic jet exit region as the speed of the actual jet increased.

  34. Rossby Number • Similar to the findings of Uccellini et al. (1984), the region of unbalanced flow produced values of Ro > 0.9.

  35. Nonlinear Balance • The nonlinear balance equation did indicate the region of gravity wave genesis, although it seemed to do a better job in pinpointing the location of the wave after formation had occurred.

  36. Shearing Instability • Shearing instability has been found to be a likely generation mechanism in an environment with strong vertical shear, such that Ri < 1/4, at an altitude where the wave propagation speed matches the wind speed, also known as the critical level (Miles(1961); Howard (1961); Einauldi and Lalas (1973); Gossard and Hooke (1975)).

  37. Shearing Instability • Wave phase speed of 15 to 20 ms-1. • Wind velocity of 15 to 20 ms-1 between 600-550 mb. • Thus, critical level is between 600-550 mb. Since Ri < ¼ at the critical level, it can be assumed that shearing instability was present at wave genesis.

  38. Conclusions • The large amplitude gravity wave that developed at 1700 UTC on 12 December 2002 adhered to the common gravity wave synoptic pattern prescribed by Uccellini and Koch (1987). • Upon examination of the various wave generation mechanisms, it was shown that moist convection, geostrophic adjustment and shearing instability were all present in the region of gravity wave genesis over central Texas.

More Related