240 likes | 255 Views
This study aims to determine the impact of CHIETA learnership, apprenticeship, and work-integrated learning (WIL) programmes on beneficiaries who completed their training in 2017/2018. It also evaluates the value of the training voucher project in advancing the knowledge and skills of SMME owners and co-workers.
E N D
Tracer Study: Impact Assessment of four CHIETA programmes (Project in progress)
Purpose / objective of study • Todetermine the impact of the CHIETA learnership, apprenticeship, and work-integrated learning (WIL) programmes in the lives of beneficiaries who completed their training during the 2017/2018 period • To determine the value of the training voucher project in terms of advancing the knowledge and skills of SMME owners and co-workers
Background • Applying the impact assessment model that was developed in 2017 on work-based learning (WBL) programmes • Defining WBL • Apprenticeships • Learnerships • Work-integrated learning (WIL) • WIL in the CHIETA context • Internships • TVET college qualifications • Higher Education Institution (HEI) qualifications
Research Methodology (1) • Both quantitative and qualitative methods are applied to collect data • Tracer study by means of cross-sectional surveys using structured interviews (beneficiaries of apprenticeships, learnerships, and WIL programmes) • Semi-structured interviews (employers and owners of SMMEs) • Case studies in video format (success stories of beneficiaries)
Research Methodology (2) • Samples for apprenticeship and learnership surveys stratified according to: • Type of learner (18.1 or 18.2) (proportional) • Type of trade/learnership (proportional) • Gender (disproportional) • Random sample was drawn from each group • Complete sample framework used for WIL participants – lack of contact details • Purposive samples for • Employers (15) • SMMEs (10) • Case studies (5)
Employment of Unemployed (18.2) learners after completion of learning programme
Employment conditions (learnerships) • Full-time (40 hours or more per week) – 87% • Permanent position – 75%
Income levels (gross p.m.) of 18.2 learners who are employed (learnerships)
Employment conditions (apprenticeships) • Full-time (40 hours or more per week) – 86% • Permanent position – 62%
Income levels (gross p.m.) of 18.2 learners who are employed (artisans)
Unemployed (18.2) learners who could not get access to employment (artisans)
Unemployed (18.2) learners who could not get access to employment (learnerships)
Case studies • Bafana Mahlangu – RPL to qualified Boilermaker (Richards Bay) • Nompumelelo Mbutho – Chemical Operations learnership (Amanzimtoti)
Preliminary recommendations • Further investigate and address the reasons why some artisans struggle to find employment • Establish a relationship with an intermediary that can assist with the placement of unemployed learners who struggle to find employment after completion of a learning programme • Further support SMMEs in terms of entrepreneurial training • Include entrepreneurial training in all programmes
Follow us on your favourite Social Media platform @chietasa @chieta_sa @chieta_sa @chietasa