1 / 41

An Analysis of “Lost To Follow-up” Infants

An Analysis of “Lost To Follow-up” Infants. Les R. Schmeltz, Au.D. NCHAM Mississippi Bend AEA-Iowa. Lost To Follow-Up. Not screened or rescreened by 6 mos. Rescreened, non-pass, no further data Diagnostic evaluation, no further data Diagnosis, no early intervention

heath
Download Presentation

An Analysis of “Lost To Follow-up” Infants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Analysis of “Lost To Follow-up” Infants Les R. Schmeltz, Au.D. NCHAM Mississippi Bend AEA-Iowa

  2. Lost To Follow-Up • Not screened or rescreened by 6 mos. • Rescreened, non-pass, no further data • Diagnostic evaluation, no further data • Diagnosis, no early intervention • No additional information beyond birth data

  3. State of Iowa • Screening & reporting voluntary until 2004 • Grantees required to report to IDPH • Some hospitals reported to IDPH using computer software • Other hospitals reported to AEAs • A few used data for internal follow-up

  4. State of Iowa-2002 • 37,555 live births • 95% of babies screened for hearing loss • IDPH receiving data on less than 50% • Most data to IDPH only initial screening results • Tracking and follow-up spotty

  5. 1/1/04 Iowa Mandate • Requires all babies to be screened for hearing loss prior to discharge from the newborn nursery • Requires all screening results be reported to IDPH • Requires all follow-up testing be reported to IDPH

  6. State of Iowa • Web-based Data Management System • Implementation pending • Will start in largest hospitals • All birthing facilities reporting • Hospitals reporting on paper data sheets • Early Access Coordinators to track • Diagnostic centers report testing results

  7. AEA 9 • 9 % of births in Iowa • 5 birthing facilities • 4 service area offices • 3 Early Childhood Audiologists • Diagnostic ABR in one facility

  8. GHS • 2300 births/year, well baby + NICU • Paid screeners, OAE • Audiologist on staff • Reports initial & follow-up data to AEA • Follow and track babies to age 3 months • Joint follow and track with AEA >3 mos.

  9. MHS • 500 births/year, well baby only • Nurses screen, OAE • Initial screening results to AEA • Follow-up & tracking by AEA • AEA office in town, local audiologist

  10. UHS • 400 births/year, well baby only • Nurses screen, OAE • Initial screening results to AEA • Follow-up & tracking by AEA • AEA office in town, AEA audiologist 1 day per week

  11. JCPH • <100 births/year, well baby only • Nurses screen, OAE • Initial screening results to AEA • Follow-up & tracking by AEA • AEA office in town, AEA audiologist 1 day per week

  12. THS • <50 births/year, well baby • Nurses screen, OAE • Initial screen results to IDPH • Inconsistent reporting to AEA • ? follow-up & tracking on babies • Opening new facility in February

  13. AEA • Universal screening at 4 hospitals since 1998 • Results reported to AEA using Hi*Track system • AEA sends letters and reports for 3 of 4 • AEA picks up follow-up at 3 mos. for 4th

  14. Data to IDPH • Initial screening data from all hospitals sent to IDPH using Hi*Track system • Follow-up and tracking information updated automatically • Data sent monthly by email • Presently over 25,000 babies in system

  15. Tracking Process • Initial results letter to parents/PCP • GHS generates and provides to parents at discharge, sends to PCP • Other hospitals inform parents after screening • Letters sent to parents and PCP by AEA • Parents also receive Early Childhood Services brochure with letter

  16. Tracking Process • Follow-up Letters • At 1 month for out-of-state babies, advising follow-up in home state • At 2 and 3 months for unilateral refers/missed • At 2, 3 and 4 months to parents of non-pass babies • To physician at 2 and 4 months for all non-pass babies

  17. Tracking Process • Telephone follow-up • At >4 mos. for all non-pass babies • To all families and PCP for babies rescreened and still non-pass • As indicated by individual situation

  18. Tracking Process • Remote Site Testing • Community Health Clinic rescreening some babies, faxing results • Early Head Start starting hearing screening program • Early learning programs require hearing screen

  19. Population Demographics

  20. Population Demographics %

  21. Population Demographics

  22. Population Demographics %

  23. Population Demographics

  24. Population Demographics

  25. “Lost To Follow-Up” • Parents contacted, no response • Moved, no forwarding address • Out-of-state • No concerns

  26. No Response • No concerns about hearing, but do not report • Language issues with letters • Lack of transportation • Family issues • Forgot to follow-up • Inconvenient location or times for testing

  27. No Response • Cost, or perceived, cost • Medical issues (chronic OM, etc) • Physician advised against testing • No perceived urgency for follow-up • Parents unaware baby could be tested • Baby no longer in home

  28. No Response • Don’t understand the importance of baby hearing properly • Intended to make appointment, just “never got around to it.” • Baby had other, more pressing, issues • Parents mentally or developmentally challenged

  29. MNFA • Letters returned marked MNFA • Telephone disconnected or unable to locate phone number (cell phone) • Physician unable to locate or unknown

  30. Out-of-state • Mostly Illinois babies born in Iowa • Initial results letters go to family • Second letter advising follow-up at facilities in the area • Card enclosed to report results back to our system

  31. No Concerns • Baby appears to be responding appropriately to sounds • Unclear to parent that mild loss may exist even with “good” responses • Family sees what they feel are normal responses • Physician not concerned about loss

  32. Referrals • “Lost To Follow-up” seen later: • Speech delay or distortion • Frequent episodes of OM • Parent concern about responses • Enrolling in program • Physician concerns • High risk or family history

  33. Lost After Diagnosis • Parents skeptical of diagnosis or “shopping” for better news • Child stuck in “medical process” • Parents could not accept that child may have a problem • Not convinced early intervention is necessary or helpful

  34. Lost After Diagnosis • Family issues (divorce, job loss,etc.) • Finances • Cost of device recommended • Perceived cost of services • Cost of participating in programming • Left area

  35. What Can We Do? • Immediate, meaningful contact with family • Rescreen appointments made prior to hospital discharge • Make initial phone contact soon after letters go out • Telephone reminders for appointments

  36. What Can We Do? • Be more persistent! • More frequent phone calls & letters • Offer alternative screening sites • Offer in-home screening services if necessary • Involve physician much earlier in the process

  37. What Can We Do? • Appoint a case manager • Smaller number of cases allows time for closer follow-up and more frequent contact • A consistent point of contact for the family to access all services

  38. What Can We Do? • Involve other agencies • Community health clinics • Visiting or public health nurses • Day care providers • Early Head Start • Physicians groups • Social service agencies

  39. What Can We Do? • Incentives for follow-up • Baby Sleep CD or cassette • Baby packet of useful items • Possible tie-in with other agencies • Classes, language groups, etc. • Pay family expenses for appointment • Provide transportation where necessary

  40. Your Ideas? • What has worked for your program? • How can we adapt your successes? • What can we all learn from each other?

More Related