160 likes | 235 Views
Report on the State of Available Data for the Study of International Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. Robert Lipsey National Bureau of Economic Research and City University of New York Presentation to the Federal Economics Advisory Committee December 17, 2010.
E N D
Report on the State of Available Data for the Study of International Trade and Foreign Direct Investment Robert Lipsey National Bureau of Economic Research and City University of New York Presentation to the Federal Economics Advisory Committee December 17, 2010
Report was commissioned by the Committee on Economic Statistics of the American Economic Association.http://www.vanderbilt.edu/AEA/AEAStat/pdfs/Report_on_Trade_Data_April_23_2010_FINAL.pdf Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Focus on trade and FDI data available for the U.S. omitting portfolio investment and international macroeconomic data. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Policy IssuesEffects of import price changes on U.S. inflation, wages, productivity.Effects of “offshoring” on U.S. employment, wages, productivity. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Policy IssuesFocus on measuring “offshoring” and its effects on wages and employment in the United States. Little attention paid to exporting, but some note taken of the uncertainty of the country resource content of imports. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Policy Issues: ExampleUncertainty of country resource content of imports highlighted by Wall Street Journal article “Not Really ‘Made in China’” (Wall Street Journal, December 16, 2010) on the location of the resources incorporated in U.S. imports of the iphone from China. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Policy Issues: Example, cont.Issue: location of production of components and other intermediate products incorporated into the Chinese exports. Source of article estimates these account for most of value, with the Chinese assembly labor adding less than 4 percent. But some part of the value of the imports consists of previous exports from the United States: the value of the inventions and designs originating in the United States. The issue is reflected later in the report in the discussion of intellectual property. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Commodity trade dataDistinction between IMF Balance of Payments Manual rules and traditional rules for collection of trade data.Shares of imports in intermediate inputs of individual industries.Distinction between gross value of trade and value added. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
International price dataExtremely limited data on prices in service trade.Use of Laspeyres index formulas in price indexes.Measurement of effects of switching of sources of imports. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
International price dataOne issue not faced in the report is the fact that a large part of international trade takes place within, rather than between, companies.Much of it is in unfinished products that cannot easily be compared with the finished products in arm’s length trade between companies. Assigning the equivalent of market prices to these products is a difficult task. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
International price dataIn connection with the belief that current international price measurements overlook changes that take place via switching from higher-price to lower-price sources of imports, it has been suggested that prices should be obtained from buyers, rather than only from sellers, of goods and services. Many years ago, Irving Kravis and I, in a study of international trade prices that preceded the BLS entry into the field (Irving B. Kravis and Robert E. Lipsey, Price Competitiveness in World Trade, (National Bureau of Economic Research, 1971), advocated and followed the principle of collecting prices from both buyers and sellers. We also avoided the use of prices from intrafirm trade as far as possible. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Trade in servicesShift in treatment of exports for processing in new Balance of Payments Manual.Collection by type of service vs. collection by primary industry (for affiliate sales of services).High exemption levels in surveys for some services.Problem of lack of sampling frame for service trade surveys.Large number of “non-comparable” services.General issues – lack of detail on service transactions. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Direct Investment DataAbandonment of data collection on acquisitions of U.S. enterprises and establishments of new ones.Abandonment of physical production in a country as criterion for locating production and substitution of incorporation.Increased reporting thresholds and increased sampling for firms and affiliates. Problem of accuracy of data on smaller countries and industries.Possibility of making data available to researchers through Census RDCs. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Direct Investment DataThe latest edition of the Balance of Payments Manual (IMF, 2009) was thought to represent a retrogression in the treatment of the location of the economic activity of multinational firms. The earlier edition required that an affiliate of a multinational firm would be considered to be a “center of economic interest and to be a resident unit of a country…when the enterprise is engaged in a significant amount of production of goods and services there or when the enterprise owns land or buildings there. The enterprise must maintain at least one productive establishment in the country…” (IMF, 1993, Par. 73). In contrast, the current BPM abandons the requirement that some activity actually take place in an affiliate and substitutes a purely legal definition in terms of ownership. The new BPM states that “a corporation is always resident in its economy of incorporation” (IMF, 2009, Par. 4.2) and “The residence of entities with little or no physical presence is to be determined from the jurisdiction of incorporation or registration.” The effect is to accept the assignment of intangible and financial assets to tax havens as movements of the location of production, even when no movement of tangible production takes place. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Direct Investment Data The Report commended the BEA for the program that allows specially sworn researchers to access respondent level versions of the inward and outward FDI data through its restricted access program, but noted the difficulty of the single location in Washington. The Committee felt that the level of research with these data and data on trade in services would be raised if the data could be made available at more locations through the Census Bureau Research Data Centers around the country. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10
Trade in IdeasEffect of migration of intellectual property for tax reasons.Intangibility of capital. What does it do to the meaning of location of production? Is the flow of ideas recorded, and how? How should it be recorded. Lipsey FESAC 12/17/10