1 / 14

Conference 7 May 2014, “Working Together on our Rights of Way” Volunteering Development

Conference 7 May 2014, “Working Together on our Rights of Way” Volunteering Development. Ruth Rourke Principal Countryside Access Officer Monmouthshire County Council. Objectives. To develop a Community Engagement Strategy

heaton
Download Presentation

Conference 7 May 2014, “Working Together on our Rights of Way” Volunteering Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conference 7 May 2014, “Working Together on our Rights of Way”Volunteering Development Ruth Rourke Principal Countryside Access Officer Monmouthshire County Council

  2. Objectives • To develop a Community Engagement Strategy • To make better use of volunteers to work on PROW and countryside access maintenance • To explore options for working with groups of volunteers

  3. Baseline Position • Policy framework is very supportive • Work programme in place • Underpinned by supporting documentation and systems • Existing experience of working with individual volunteers (with volunteer co-ordinator)

  4. Existing volunteer network

  5. Who are our volunteers? • Groups – include, for example • NW Monmouthshire Ramblers/Lower Wye Ramblers • Raglan/MathernLocal Ways • BHS Bridleway Group • Monmouthshire Walking Festival Group • Abergavenny/Usk/TinternWalkers are Welcome • Individuals • 39 women and 77 men • 78 are retired, 36 are employed 1 is a student and 1 is unemployed

  6. What do our volunteers do? • Pathcaresurveys and recording • PROW maintenance (e.g. vegetation clearance) • Data entry onto CAMS (e.g. comms from public, work to be done, work done) • Litter picking • Compiling walk leaflets • Walking website • Development of walks and leading walks • Walking festival

  7. Support provision Support for volunteers is provided in the form of: • Training • Supervision by MCC staff • Procuring appropriate materials • Liaising with landowners • Health and safety infrastructure • Practical support

  8. Feedback – what works well • The people! Morag • Appropriate training • Set-up of groups was done well e.g. lots of support • Map given is good • Insurance • “Pathcare” • Setting up volunteer groups • When problems are reported on established pathways action is taken • Training provision excellent • Equipment supplied • Verbal support • Pathcare training course • First aid training • Mapping • Waymark stickers • Equipment • People in charge: • Volunteer Co-ordinator/focal point • Warden organising walk programme • Supplying tools/training/maps & information • Things that are reported get fixed (sometimes) • Allocated a single route to check three times a year • Appropriate training for pathcare, leading walk and first aid • Good communication – volunteer system with Morag • Equipment supplied

  9. Feedback – what needs improving • Feedback from service to volunteers • Major problems dealt with slowly after reporting (x2) • No user/volunteer meetings with service • No involvement of young people • User meetings have ceased • Setting up of groups then ‘abandoned’ • Communication with groups > • Follow up of action promised is poor • Direction of groups – who is leading? Driving? Pulling everything together • Diverting pathways/A’s to definitive map NOT happening • Furniture installed on pathways that go nowhere • Transparency – help us understand why problems exist • Walk leaders training? (good when run by Tim H) • Advertising & improving marketing volunteer opportunities particularly to youngsters • Ability to do maintenance or other tasks at weekend • More communication of what needs to be done • Website • Means of sharing good practice • Resources Available – limiting factor is organising work to do – Super vol? • Dealing with low priority issues • Feedback about things we’ve reported • Web based reporting of faults + needs feedback • Communication & links between lots of groups • Major work not undertaken by volunteers as not covered by insurance- not encouraged • Inviting more community service assistance (with supervision) • Minor public footpaths neglected/lost (still on ordnance survey map so visitors have negative experience)

  10. Examples of current models of volunteering

  11. Current volunteering activities/groups

  12. Options identified INTERNAL COLLABORATION        • Continue as at present • Services share a co-ordinator • No co-ordinator EXTERNAL COLLABORATION • Each org takes on what it can within existing core funding, staffing and mission • MCC commissions one or more orgs • Full partnership approach, combining volunteer effort and including project-specific fund-raising STAY AS COUNTRYSIDE ACCESS SERVICE ALONE • P/t co-ordinator, but working with groups only. • No co-ordinator

  13. Where we are now

  14. volunteers

More Related