1 / 3

Personal virtues as ethical tests

That sounds pretty simple

heaton
Download Presentation

Personal virtues as ethical tests

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Personal virtues as ethical ‘tests’ Most persistent with the Greek “Big Three” Socrates: What is the good life? Focus on ‘success’ as the pathway to happiness, prosperity & contentment Ethics (individual concept) and politics (group concept) were synonymous Plato: How does a good society lead to a good life? Focus on ‘justice’ as the pathway to happiness, prosperity & contentment People had distinct roles and could develop only into that role into which they were born (social immobility). How does this impact the concept of being ‘good’? Aristotle: How does a good individual contribute to a good society? Focus on ‘reason’ as the pathway to excellence, leading to happiness Believed in a discrete list of virtues that all should habitually develop: open, honest, truthful, moderate, and proud

    2. That sounds pretty simple…what’s the problem? Objections to ‘virtue ethics’ Who defines those terms? What about outcomes? Is it ethical to be ‘truthful’ if the truth devastates other people involved? (main ethical objection to whistleblowing) What about the fakers and the choosers? Gap between ‘espoused’ and ‘enacted’ Picking and choosing when to be virtuous More recently: what about context? Ignores situational context as a moderator to ethical decision-making Puts pressure on the individual to deflect forces such as culture, incentives and comparisons (competition)

    3. When good people do bad things Bottom line: we see ‘good’ people doing bad things– how might we understand this? Multiple examples of how context, culture, and norms strongly influence our behavioral decisions Bystander syndrome (diffusion of responsibility) Pharmaceutical reps & prescription-writing behavior McCabe et al.’s research findings We resist the idea that we, alone, do not determine our own behavioral decisions Attribution theory and self-serving bias come into play Although research has found some evidence of a ‘predisposition’ toward being able to overcome situational pressures, it is not clearly differentiated

More Related