1 / 19

Safety & Efficacy Update on Approved TNF-Blocking Agents

Safety & Efficacy Update on Approved TNF-Blocking Agents. Jeffrey N. Siegel, M.D. OTRR, CBER / FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee March 4, 2003. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. TNF BLOCKING AGENTS. Etanercept (Enbrel) first TNF blocker approved for RA: 1998

Download Presentation

Safety & Efficacy Update on Approved TNF-Blocking Agents

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Safety & Efficacy Update on Approved TNF-Blocking Agents Jeffrey N. Siegel, M.D. OTRR, CBER / FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee March 4, 2003 Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

  2. TNF BLOCKING AGENTS • Etanercept (Enbrel) first TNF blocker approved for RA: 1998 • Currently three approved • Each has demonstrated high ACR response rates • Each associated with uncommon, but serious adverse events

  3. Indications & Use: Etanercept • Monotherapy or combination with MTX for moderately to severely active RA • Improving signs and symptoms • Inhibition of progression of structural damage • Polyarticular-course JRA • Psoriatic arthritis

  4. Indications & Use: Infliximab • Combination with MTX for moderately to severely active RA • Improving signs & symptoms • Inhibition of progression of structural damage • Improvement in physical function • Crohn’s Disease • Active disease (CDAI score > 220) • Fistulizing disease

  5. Adalimumab (Humira) • Monoclonal antibody to TNF-alpha • Sequence human-derived however studies demonstrate immunogenicity • Pivotal trials assessed safety and efficacy of: • Monotherapy • Combination with methotrexate • Add on to standard of care • Licensed in December, 2002

  6. Adalimumab Clinical Responses at 6 mo (% of patients)

  7. IndicationsHUMIRA (Adalimumab) • Monotherapy or combination with MTX or other DMARDs for RA • Improving signs and symptoms • Inhibition of progression of structural damage

  8. Adalimumab: Dosing Considerations • Recommended dose 40 mg SC q2wk • Optimal dose for MTX combination • With monotherapy, 40 q2wk effective, but higher response rates with 40 mg qwk • Monotherapy associated with higher rates of antibody formation than MTX combination • Immunogenicity associated with lower ACR response rates

  9. Safety Update • Follow-up of August, 2001 AAC presentation • Present in depth discussion of new data on previously recognized serious adverse events and some newly recognized adverse events: • TB experience with adalimumab • Lymphoma, malignancies with all agents • Liver injury with infliximab/etanercept • CHF

  10. Analysis of Safety • Based on data from: • Controlled clinical trials • Open-label extension studies • Postmarketing commitment for each product to assess 1000-2000 subjects x 5 years for malignancies and serious infections • Postmarketing registries • Spontaneous post-marketing reports

  11. Serious Adverse Events AssociatedWith All 3 Approved TNF Blocking Agents Serious infections Tuberculosis Opportunistic infections (e.g. histoplasmosis, listeriosis, coccidiodomycosis, PCP) Non-opportunistic infections Demyelinating events Autoantibodies & Autoimmune disease

  12. Safety Concerns With TNF Blockers • For etanercept and infliximab, observed mostly in postmarketing reports; some controlled trials in other diseases • For adalimumab: • Much larger safety database at time of approval • SAEs observed pre-marketing • Many consistent with known mechanism of action, e.g. infections • Others unanticipated, e.g. CHF, demyelination

  13. Agency’s Communication of Risks • Stated in PI under: • PRECAUTIONS section • WARNINGS section • BOX WARNING • Dear Healthcare Provider Letters • Peer-reviewed scientific publications • Presentations to Advisory Committee • Presentations at Medical Meetings

  14. Considerations for Package Insert • Wording not identical for each product • Language dictated by data • Where data are similar, especially where there is a biologic rationale, class labeling may be warranted

  15. TB: Infliximab • TB seen in clinical trials • Cases of TB, some fatal and with unusual presentation, observed in post-marketing reports • Reporting rate several fold higher than incidence in US population* • TB seen in patients not otherwise at risk • Boxed warning: screening and prophylaxis recommended for all patients

  16. TB: Etanercept • Uncommon cases of TB seen in post-marketing experience: • Reporting rate similar to US incidence* • No cases in RA trials in US or EU (N=3280) • Most US patients otherwise at high risk • Label: Bold warning

  17. Why Would AEs Differ Among Different TNF Blockers? • Potential explanations: • Differing mechanisms of action: soluble receptor, monoclonal antibodies • Differing affinity, avidity of binding • Differing ability to lyse TNF-bearing monocytes • Differing immunogenicity • Differences may contribute to unique efficacy and safety properties

  18. Agenda • Update committee on known AEs and on newly documented AEs with TNF-blocking agents: • TB • malignancies and lymphomas • Liver enzyme elevations/hepatic AEs • CHF • Challenges in interpreting open-label and post-marketing safety data

  19. OVERVIEW

More Related