130 likes | 222 Views
Task Shifting, Service Coverage and Service Quality: Preliminary Findings from 2 Districts of Malawi. By John Kadzandira PhD Researcher, RCSI ( ChRAIC Programme). Outline of the Presentation. Study background, aims and objectives Study design, methods and status of data collection
E N D
Task Shifting, Service Coverage and Service Quality: Preliminary Findings from 2 Districts of Malawi By John Kadzandira PhD Researcher, RCSI (ChRAIC Programme)
Outline of the Presentation • Study background, aims and objectives • Study design, methods and status of data collection • Findings • Conclusions and Recommendations (Preliminary)
Study background, aims and objectives • Malawi continues to face HR problems BUT still needs to provide services to all residents • From 2004/05, Malawi has received huge external support for HIV & AIDS (GFATM, WB, pooled donors etc.) • Rural areas were still underserved (even with these external funds) because of HR shortfalls (among other reasons) • BUT HOW to scale-up without HR? • Solution: TASK SHIFTING • Using community health workers (Health Surveillance Assistants) to provide HTC • Using CBOs, lay councillors & expert patients • etc.
Study background, aims and objectives; Cont’d • The study is being conducted to assess: • The impact of task shifting on the quality of HIV services • The coverage of both HIV and community-level PHC which HSAs are primarily meant for • Study being done in Salima and Mangochi districts (formerly of SWEF-GHIN study • ........the 2 districts had mixed trends for HIV and non HIV services between 2005 and 2008)
Study design & methods –(Design: Cross-sectional exploratory mixed methods study
Findings – Service coverage (service trends since 2005/6) • HSA numbers jumped astronomically between 2006 and 2007 (with GF support) • Modest increases observed in numbers of clinicians and nurses (declining in rural areas) • HTC and ART clients rose dramatically between 2006 and 2009 (signifying HSA contribution and annual HTC campaign weeks) • Declines or stable statistics observed for Pentavalent and FP especially between 2008 and 2010 • Statistics for community level interventions being collected at the moment
Service trends cont’d • Trend data (Mangochi district overall) – example:
Findings cont’d • PHC trends may be declining from two causes (according to facility and district managers): • Drug stock-outs and competing time demands between HIV and NON-HIV among HSAs • Has task shifting led to reduced workload among nurses and clinicians? • NO! (according to facility managers and nurses interviewed so far) • With HTC increasing and stigma reducing, this meant more clients for ART, PMTCT and seeking other care
Are HSAs allocating time between HIV and Community PHC equally? • Not all HSAs are providing HTC services (some relief) • However, HSAs providing HTC allocating =>70% of time to HTC and facility based work than community work (n=45) “I like working in the HTC clinic rather than getting soaked in the rains.....repairing bicycles while in transit to or from the villages...”, female HSA, Salima
How about quality of HIV/HTC services? (perceptions of facility managers/clinicians & nurses) • Yes & No BUT “...half a loaf of bread is better than none....”, Nurse, Mangochi “...even highly qualified nurses and clinical officers also make mistakes, so don’t expect 100% from HSAs...”, District officer, Mangochi “we should guard against turning our HSAs into central (referral) hospitals....they shouldn’t do everything...”. MoH Official, Headquarters
Other issues coming out • 10% of HSAs providing HTC in Salima never been on formal HTC training • According to 1 district informant – nurses/clinicians got trained but they don’t provide HTC (are in PMTCT & ART) • [Yet to compare HTC performance through observations with those formally trained] • HSAs complaining of increased workload ....amid long distances to catchment areas (those not residing there); no additional incentives for providing HTC alongside PHC
Discussion, Conclusions (preliminary) • Evidence from data collected so far suggests that: • Task shifting to scale-up HTC using HSAs led to increased uptake of both HIV and non-HIV services • This created more work for nurses and clinicians • Serving clients and completing M&E forms for multiple donors (even with the ‘3-Ones’ in place • There are doubts over the quality of HTC services being provided by HSAs (TO BE VERIFIED LATER THORUGH HTC OBSERVATIONS) • Community PHC services being sidelined where the HSA is providing both HIV and non-HIV services