Jessica Brown Research Officer, ODI 14 July 2010

1. Financial transfer mechanisms: resources for developing countriesInternational Parliamentary Conference on Climate Change Jessica Brown Research Officer, ODI 14 July 2010

2. Financial transfer mechanism • Parties assigned operation of the financial mechanism to the Global Environment Facility (GEF) • Financial mechanism is accountable to the COP, which decides on its climate change policies, programme priorities, eligibility criteria for funding. • In addition to GEF guidance, Parties have established three special funds: Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF), Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF), under the Convention, and Adaptation Fund (AF), under the Kyoto Protocol. • Funding for climate change activities also available through bilateral, regional and multilateral channels.

3. Description and status of funds GEF Trust Fund: • Earmarked for national communication processes, adaptation assessment, capacity building for adaptation, etc. • Disbursed: US$ 2.6 billion to Climate Change projects, as of 3rd November 2009 and since the start of GE Trust Fund (all 4 replenishment periods – since 1994, averaging ~$175k per annum). Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF) • Established to finance the special needs of developing countries in adaptation, tech transfer, and climate sensitive sectors • US$ 120 mn pledged, of which US$100 has been deposited and $91 disbursed to projects Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) • Created to support preparation and implementation of NAPAs. These NAPAs provide a prioritized list of immediate adaptation projects. • Approved projects as of November 2009: US$ 111.86 million For more detailed information on funds, including bi- and multilateral funds, please visit www.climatefundsupdate.org

4. Description and status of funds (cont’d) Adaptation Fund • Established by the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol of the UNFCCC to finance adaptation projects and programmes in developing countries that are Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. • Funding is derived from proceeds of the 2% levy on transactions under the CDM (although it may also be complemented with other sources of funding). • Offers a unique model for CC funding governance • Four projects just approved (Nicaragua, Pakistan, Senegal, Solomon Islands) for total value of USD 21.8 million • Senegal first country to exercise Direct Access - using an NGO as National Implementing Entity (NIE)

5. What is the future of climate change finance under the Convention?

6. Climate finance post-Copenhagen In the Copenhagen Accord: “The collective commitment by developed countries is to provide new and additional resources, […] through international institutions, approaching USD 30 billion for the period 2010 – 2012. […] [D]eveloped countries commit to a goal of mobilizing jointly USD 100 billion dollars a year by 2020 to address the needs of developing countries. This funding will come from a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and multilateral, including alternative sources of finance.”

7. Issues with Copenhagen Accord • Unclear how ‘additionality’ is being defined • Unclear how this money will be managed, and by whom • Unclear how funding will be secured, or where will it come from • Unclear who will pay for what • No distinction between public and private finance

8. The Need for Climate Finance • There is currently a gap in the scale of climate finance needed for developing countries to mitigate and adapt to climate change • However, there is currently no means of assessing either the actual demand for funding or the absorption capacity. Can create mistrust between developed and developing nations, which can hamper progress on tackling climate change. Need (between 2010-2012) USD 16-35 billion

9. ‘New and additional’ funds difficult to estimate, but significantly less than pledges made • Source: Project Catalyst draft presentation, April 2010 • Past money pledged but not paid in to climate funds until XXX 2009 based on climatefundsupdate.org • OECD climate change commitments until 2008 multiplied by 3 to compare with 2010-2012 pledges

10. What is currently available? Pledges of existing funds total roughly US$19 bn, only US$2 bn has been deposited (most funds made operational in 2008)

11. Moving forward: Possible solutions to securing appropriate scale of finance • Create new and predictable resource mobilization mechanisms for international public finance • Budgetary contributions • Carbon markets • Various forms of taxation • Others (bonds, CTT, etc) • Engage the private sector by creating the right incentives • Concessional lending for mitigation and adaptation investments • Explore other incentives such as advanced market commitments, or more generally using public sector financial instruments to mitigate private sector investment risks

12. New finance coming in – where do we need to focus? • Maximise impact on mitigation and adaptation in face of constrained resources and absorptive capacity • Must therefore attract private funding • Must therefore aim for biggest bang for the buck • Must aim to fund longer term abatement projects which avoid carbon ‘lock in’ • Therefore, in order to maximise impact, funding must be • Coordinated across donors – focus on leveraging to get an impact (not necessarily within one pot) • Matched effectively to needs • Disbursed rapidly

13. Thank you Contact: Jessica Brown j.brown@odi.org.uk www.climatefundsupdate.org

15. How will future funds be managed and delivered in the long term? • Options for institutional arrangements: • Institutions: New or Existing (e.g., GEF)? • Coherence: Consolidated across other donors or fragmented? • Decision-making: Devolved to country or retained by fund board? • Approval: Centralised or decentralised?