840 likes | 2.46k Views
Handle, Shank, Working End. Shank. Shank. Shank. . HANDLE. HANDLE. HANDLE. Shank. Head. . . . . Use of the Dental Mirror. Indirect visionIlluminationReflection of lightTransilluminationReflection of light
E N D
1. Periodontal Instrumentation Grasp, Fulcrum, Wrist Motion,
Using the Periodontal Probe
2. Handle, Shank, Working End
3. Use of the Dental Mirror Indirect vision
Illumination
Reflection of light
Transillumination
Reflection of light “through” the tooth surface
Especially for calculus
Retraction
4. Modified Pen Grasp Most efficient grasp
Control – Stability
Pivot Point
5. Modified Pen Grasp
6. Establishing a Finger Fulcrum Stability
Activate instrument - stroke
pivot
Control - prevents injury
Always on a stable oral structure
Occlusal plane, mandible, zygoma
Ring finger
7. FulcrumsIntraoral Intraoral
As close to working areas as possible
Approximately two teeth away
Do not fulcrum on the same tooth
Mandibular arch
Maxillary anterior teeth
8. Extra-Oral Fulcrum Extraoral
Maxillary arch
Posterior teeth
9. Wrist Motion Side to side
Up and down
Activated by pivoting fulcrum finger
Wrist must be straight to activate stroke - movement of instrument
Will be demonstrated on the presenter
10. Instrument Identification Name, design number, manufacturer
Determined by use
Probes
Explorers
Curets
Sickles
Hoes
Files
Chisels
11. The Probe Primary instrument in the periodontal exam
Assess gingival health
Periodontal status
Exploratory
Requires skill development
12. Probe Design Vary in cross-sectional design
Rectangular in shape (flat)
Oval
Round
Millimeter markings
Calibrated at varying intervals
13. Marquis Probe Color coded
3, 6, 9, 12 mm markings
Thin working end
Key is to know the increments
Type of probe being used
14. Use of the Probe Inserted to the Junctional epithelium
Measures sulcus
Periodontal pockets
Gingival recession
Attachment loss
15. Angulation Probe is parallel to long axis of tooth
16. Interproximal Angulation Slightly tilted
Apical to the contact point
17. Adaptation Working end is well-adapted to tooth surface
18. Technique Gently “walk” the probe
19. Readings Six readings
Distal (DB & DL)
Buccal (B) or Lingual (L)
Mesial (MB & ML)
Deepest reading within the designated areas
20. Gracey Curets
21. Gracey Series Anterior Teeth
5/6 all surfaces of anteriors/premolars
Posterior Teeth (next week)
7/8 Buccal & Lingual Surfaces
11/12 Mesial Surfaces
13/14 Distal Surfaces
15/16 Mesial Surfaces
17/18 Distal Surfaces
22. Design Characteristics Standard or Finishing (non-rigids)
Rigid
Extra Rigid
Extended Shanks
Different Blade sizes
Regular
Mini
23. Design Characteristics Area specific
Adapt to a specific area or tooth surface
Two curved edges with a blade
Only one cutting edge is used for calculus removal
24. Design Characteristics Working end is tilted in relationship to the terminal shank (offset by 70°)
Makes one cutting edge lower than the other
This lower end is the one that is used for instrumentation
25. Identification of the Cutting Edge Place shank perpendicular to floor
Lower blade is the cutting edge
Lower shank will be parallel to surface being scaled
26. Advantages of Design Characteristics Allows insertion into deep pockets
Prevents tissue trauma
Correct cutting edge to tooth surface angulation
Easier adaptation
Around convex tooth crowns to access root surfaces
27. Adapting the Curet Blade
29. Adaptation of lower third of blade to tooth surface
30. Relationship of Lower Shank to Blade Angulation
31. Calculus Removal“Channeling”
32. Review of Fundamentals of Instrumentation
33. Working Stroke
34. Basic Design Characteristics of the Working end of Instruments
35. Curet Toe vs Sickle Tip
36. Comparison of Curets & Sickle Blades
37. Sickle Scaler
38. Uses Supragingival calculus
Stain
Slightly subgingival (1-2mm)
39. Different Designs Anterior teeth
Posterior teeth
Modified shank
Blade can vary in size & design
40. Design Characteristics Straight rigid shank
Two cutting edges
Straight or slightly curved
Back of the instrument
Pointed or rounded
41. Adaptation
42. Adaptation
43. ANGULATION
44. Technique Divide tooth structure in 3rds
Distal line angle towards interproximal
Mesial line angle towards interproximal
Labial or Lingual Surface
Graceys or Universals
Mesial & Distal
Vertical stroke
45. Visual Guide to InstrumentationAnterior Teeth Handle extends upward/parallel to long axis of teeth when interproximal
Does not apply to Facial or Lingual surfaces
Oblique stroke is best
Alternative instruments are better than sickle
Prevent tissue trauma
46. Visual Guide to Instrumentation Lower shank is parallel to surface being scaled
Vertical stroke
47. CLINIC DEMONSTRATION H6/7Sickle Scaler
Shank slightly curved
Review on clinic floor
48. Universal Curets
49. TYPES OF UNIVERSAL CURETTES Columbia
Barnhart
Bunting
Goldman
Younger-Good
Langer (gracey shank)
50. Design Features Can adapt to all tooth surfaces
90 degree blade angulation
shank curvature allows adaptation
both cutting edges are used
blade curved on only one plane
53. Use of the Universal Curet:Anterior teeth Both instrument ends will be used
Handle is parallel to long axis of tooth
Adapt blade to mesial or distal
Initiate by starting at the tooth midline
Work towards the interproximal
Refer to diagram on pages 183-184 in Pattison
54. Type of Stroke Used Oblique on buccal & lingual
Vertical on Mesial & Distal
55. Use of the Universal Curet:Posterior Region Select the working end that adapts to the interproximal surface
Lower Shank is parallel to mesial surface
Select blade that is in contact with the mesial surface
Use from the distal line angle towards mesial surface
56. Use of the Universal Curet:Posterior Region Using the same working end
No flipping of instrument
Select the opposite or “secondary” blade to scale the distal surface
Note that the lower shank is parallel to the distal surface
57. Vertical Interproximal Stroke Vertical Stroke on Mesial and Distal Surfaces
58. Posterior Scaling withGracey Instruments
59. Gracey Curets Area specific
Shank design
Blade design
Each working end is a mirror image
Blade identification
Allows for correct working end
Adaptation to surface being scaled
60. Lower third is used for calculus removal
61. 7/8 Gracey Curet Buccal & Lingual Surfaces
Posterior teeth
Initiate stroke from the distal line angle
Finish stroke at the mesial line angle
Stroke used
Oblique or horizontal
Lower shank is not parallel
stroke is “towards midline”
62. 11/12 and 15/16 Gracey Curets Used on mesial surfaces of all posterior
Initiate stroke at mesial line angle and continue towards the mesial-interproximal surface
Each end is a mirror image
63. 13/14 Gracey Curet Distal surfaces
Initiate stroke at the distal line angle
Continue towards interproximal (distal)
Difficult to see blade use shank as visual cue
Keep lower shank parallel to tooth surface
64. Exploratory vs Working Stroke Blade is less than 45°
Grasp is lighter
Tactile sensitivity is enhanced
On the “down” stroke
Objective is to identify depth of calculus Blade is 45-90°
Calculus removal
Firm grasp
Engage blade by
Adaptation or “bite”
On the “up” stroke
Vertical
Oblique
65. Adaptation Degree of “how open” or “closed” the blade is upon insertion is dependent on:
Type of tissue
Fibrotic vs boggy or hemorrhagic tissue
Severity of disease
Retractable tissue
Interproximal embrasure
Tenacity of calculus
67. How well have we scaled? At time of S/RP appointment
Exploring, probing
Smoothness of tooth surface
After appointment
Healthy periodontium
Decreased bleeding, pocket depths, marginal bleeding
68. Limitations obscured vision from bleeding
tactile sensitivity
instruments selected
direction & length of strokes
confines of soft tissue - tissue type
tooth anatomy
clinical findings
“mental image” based on visual, mental, and manual skills
69. Limitations Accurate treatment plan
Anesthesia, number of appointments
Severity of Disease progression
Local factors
Systemic factors
Pockets, furcas, anatomical characteristics, erosion, recession, mobility
72. Sequence to Periodontal Instrumentation Patient Assessment
Local and systemic factors that influence periodontal condition
Hx of smoking
Periodontal Evaluation
Severity of disease
Periodontal tx plan
Surgery, grafts,
Overall objective of phase I therapy
Calculus Assessment
How difficult, tenacity, depth
73. Sequence to Periodontal Instrumentation Phase I Simple = 1 appointment
Simple case, light calculus, little sensitivity, controlled periodontal condition, mild inflammation
Phase I Intermediate – 2 appointments
Overdue, early Periodontitis 4-5 mm pockets,
Patient may require ˝ mouth anesthesia (Lower & upper quads avoid same arch)
Phase I Complex
4 appointment by quads with anesth, pockets, calculus, furcations
Re-evaluation appointment
74. Sequence to Periodontal Instrumentation Full mouth
Start in tooth sequence for plaque removal
Assess where calculus is present
Areas of inflammation
Two appointment
Anesthesia, upper & lower quad
Complex
Each quadrant with anesthesia