1 / 30

Tammy Blackburn Paul Kazemersky May 4, 2007

Skis on the roof or on the slope?: Mobility improvement options for the Colorado I-70 Mountain Corridor. Tammy Blackburn Paul Kazemersky May 4, 2007. Outline. Problem Proposed Solutions Changing Parameters Costs and Benefits NPV of Alternatives.

hei
Download Presentation

Tammy Blackburn Paul Kazemersky May 4, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Skis on the roof or on the slope?:Mobility improvement options for the Colorado I-70 Mountain Corridor Tammy Blackburn Paul Kazemersky May 4, 2007

  2. Outline • Problem • Proposed Solutions • Changing Parameters • Costs and Benefits • NPV of Alternatives

  3. I-70 is the only divided highway that crosses Colorado from the east to west Source: Mapquest

  4. I-70 provides access to most of the ski resorts in Colorado and its more populated mountain communities

  5. I-70 sees high levels of congestion

  6. I-70 has several major problem points

  7. Steep cliffs, narrow canyons, and roaring rivers make all mobility improvements more costly and time consuming

  8. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) identified 20 possible solutions to alleviate congestion and accommodate future growth

  9. CDOT believes that 4 billion in 2004 dollars is the upper threshold for capital improvements (millions) CDOT Limit 4,000 Identified Project Funds 1,600 ------- Unfunded Balance 2,600

  10. Modes vary in their carrying capacity

  11. The length of improvements vary with the alternatives

  12. What happens with a 4 billion dollar cap?

  13. A 4 billion dollar cap eliminates any multimodal solution for the corridor’s congestion

  14. Instead of using an arbitrary capital cost cap, we evaluated five options of interest using a base case of minimal action

  15. Using an inflator based on the gross domestic product since 2004 we adjusted the cost estimates to 2007 dollars

  16. We adjusted several parameters to gain insight into the sensitivity of CDOT’s findings • Ridership Numbers • Fare Charges

  17. CDOT projected transit fares based on 10¢ a mile per passenger in 2000 dollars

  18. Adjusting fare prices to 2007 dollars brings the base case to 11.7¢ a mile

  19. CDOT made fares less than it would cost a person for just the price of their fuel Travel by Public Transit to and from Summit County with CDOT’s base fare: $9.35*2 = $18.70 Travel by Personal Car to and from Summit County: 160 miles/22.5 mpg = 7.1 gallons 7.1 gallons*$2.90 gallon = $20.59

  20. This suggests that there is some leeway to increase fares that generate additional operating income Fare structure at 13¢ a mile Fare structure at 15¢ a mile

  21. Revenue grows while operating subsidies decline 13 cents/mile 10 cents/mile 15 cents/mile

  22. To differentiate our analysis from CDOT’s we explored ridership numbers 10% More CDOT’s Estimate 20% More

  23. We settled on modeling transit at 10% more passengers traveling for 13 cents/mile

  24. Standing for Cost-Benefit Analysis • Affected County Residents • State Residents • Tourists • Business interests • Local and interstate freight interest

  25. Each alternative has a different ability to accommodate demand

  26. Transit provides growth capacity beyond the study period of CDOT’s analysis

  27. Expansion options preserve existing travel times

  28. Methodology of Ranking Alternatives • Took numbers in 2000 dollars and converted them to 2006 dollars • Then inflated by 3% a year • Applied varying social discount rates and compared it to a constant social discount rate

  29. With a constant NPV, building a highway and preserving a right of way for an Advanced Guideway System has the greatest NPV

  30. Applying different social discount rates on the ability of an alternative to increase capacity leads to a high NPV for multimodal solutions

More Related