1 / 12

DIME & ITDG Steering Group

DIME & ITDG Steering Group. 11-12 December 2013 ITEM 2 WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE/COLLABORATION DIME-ITDG. Objectives. Discuss the pros and cons regrouping DIME and ITDG groups and the related practical modalities

helene
Download Presentation

DIME & ITDG Steering Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DIME & ITDGSteering Group 11-12 December 2013 ITEM 2 WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE/COLLABORATION DIME-ITDG

  2. Objectives • Discuss the pros and cons regrouping DIME and ITDG groups and the relatedpracticalmodalities • Discuss the overarchingprinciples for rationalising the working group structure under DIME and ITDG • Agree on an overalschedule

  3. Outline • Currentstatus • Key principles • To be state • Mapping and Migration plan • Discussion 1 : Pros and cons of DIME/ITDG merge - practicalities • Discussion 2 : Issues identification

  4. Background and brief history • The group structure for corporate statistical and IT services was discussed in 11/2012 at the ITDG meeting and in DIME 02/2013 and the following needs were identified : • Stronger coordination between ITDG and DIME; • The number technical working groups should be limited; • Avoiding duplicated reporting lines for IT on one side and standards and methodology on the other side; • Improve agilityin delivering solutions. 2

  5. SDC expert group ESEC TF Current status IT principles e-task team Software Sharing e-task team SecurityWorking Group(for one year only) SISAIWorking Group StatisticalConfidentialityWorking Group MetadataWorking Group Classification Working Group QualityWorking Group SA Steering Group SA User group ITDG DIME ITDG/DIMESteering Group ESS Architecture TF ESS.VIP IT TF SDMX-RI User Group EDAMIS + Validation services User Group ESSMetadata Handler User Group ESS validation TF 3

  6. Basic principles • Learn from similar experience at UNECE and in some NSIs which are undergoing modernisation activities (ABS, …); • Implement the concept of separation of concern and map targeted structure onto the EA layers; • Ensure coherence of development within each layer and across layers; • Reduce fragmentation and limit the number of instances; • Reduce the number of governance levels; • Strive for improved responsiveness/reaction time in delivering solutions; • Provide a structure based on content and independent of Eurostat (re-)organisation(s).

  7. The "to-be" state of the ESS group structure Directors Group on System integration (DGSI) DGSISteering Group Steering Confidentiality - security Methods and standards IT - technology Quality Services Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Monitoring - evaluation Quality and ComplianceWorking Group ICT Working Group: Solution and technical Architecture StatisticalConfidentiality& Security Working Group Modernization Working Group: Standards, processes and methods SDMX-RI User Group Task Forces Task teams and Expert Groups working on e-platforms Limited mandate (scope and/or time) These groups can be set for the benefit of one or more of the WGs Their working modalities should be intensely based on virtual fora ESSMetadata Handler User Group Projects EDAMIS + Validation services User Group SA User Group

  8. VIRTUAL MAPPING TOWARDS TO BE STRUCTURE ITDG/DIMESteering Group Confidentiality - security Quality Methods and standards IT - technology Services DIME ITDG MetadataWorking Group QualityWorking Group SISAIWorking Group Classification Working Group DISSEMINATION WORKING GROUP EDAMIS + Validation services User Group StatisticalConfidentiality Working group ESS architecture TF ESS validation TF Experts group on SDC Experts group on SDMX-DDI ESS.VIP IT TF / SIMSTAT ESEC TF SDMX-RI User Group SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT STEERING GROUP ESSMetadata Handler User Group Projects SecurityWorking Group(one year only) SA User Group

  9. Possible migration • March 2014 : Presentation of a comprehensive proposal to DIME/ITDG plenary meeting including the revision of the mandate, the rules of procedures for DIME/ITDG and the overal portfolio • May 2014 : submission of the mandate of the DGSI to ESSC for adoption – if accepted - as part of the yearly report package • 2014 : No change in WG structure, meetings are held back to back with some overlap – discussion and adaptation of the mandate/portfolio of the different sub groups • Beginning 2015 : Mandates & work programme for the new ESS working groups adopted by the DGSI

  10. Discussion 1 : Merging DIME/ITDG Pros Cons Practicalities Agenda structure Frequencies of plenary meetings, SG, written consultation Collaboration platforms MS representations - collective intelligence

  11. Discussion 2 : Issues

  12. Thank you for your attention!

More Related