170 likes | 300 Views
OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION. IRP Multiracial Coalition Building ReportSummary of findingsLand use planning and race in Richland County, SCCase study. CONCLUSIONS. Successful multiracial coalitions can and do existContext mattersTensions should be understood and confronted as structurally produc
E N D
1. MULTIRACIAL STRATEGIES Maya Wiley
Director
The Center for Social Inclusion
2. OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION
IRP Multiracial Coalition Building Report
Summary of findings
Land use planning and race in Richland County, SC
Case study
3. CONCLUSIONS Successful multiracial coalitions can and do exist
Context matters
Tensions should be understood and confronted as structurally produced
Trust and ideology/worldview matter
Strong constituency-based institutions matter
4. Tensions between groups are structurally produced Competition for resources
Segregation
Political fragmentation
5. INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESSFUL MULTIRACIAL COALITIONS Visionary leadership who trust each other;
Sufficient institutional structures to support the collaboration;
Some degree of shared ideology/worldview (race analysis);
Clear communication of common interests to constituents; and
Strategic vision for structural reform communicated in clear terms to constituents
6. Sprawl in the Metro Columbia Region The City of Columbia
Population grew 2% (1970-2000).
vacancy rates increased by 11%
poverty rates increased by 25%
The surrounding suburbs
Grew by 83% (1970-2000)
vacancy rates declined by 25%
poverty rates decreased by 50% in the surrounding suburbs
Source: Department of Housing and Urban Development. State of the Cities Database System.
7. Black poverty is more highly concentrated than white poverty.
8. Blacks, Latino/as and other non-whites have higher rates of poverty than whites
9. Low-income Blacks have High rates of homeownership Homeownership rates in Richland County
10. Sprawl is not uniform across Richland County
11. There are few jobs in Black concentrated poverty communities
12. Because of sprawl, environmentalists want to preserve green space in Lower Richland
13. Richland County’s land use plan tries to curb sprawl Large lot zoning
Small increase in minimum lot size in rural areas (Ľ acre lot size change increase)
Incentives for planned growth with higher densities
development of new villages
14. Large lot zoning will not curb sprawl A Ľ acre lot size change increases the cost per housing unit by
$350-500 for rural land
$1,500 to $2,300 for urban/suburban land
No impact on sprawl in the Northeast and Northwest
Harder for Black homeowners to subdivide land for family use?
15. New Villages in LR, if built, would be concentrated poverty communities Leapfrog development, unconnected to opportunity structures
No employment base
Far from employment
17. What went wrong in Richland County? The planning process lacked a racial analysis of sprawl and development in the region
The result was a one-size-fits all approach, which does not stem sprawl
Black community suspicious of sprawl control measures
Environmental community and Black community lack cohesion and united front
18. RACIAL ANALYSIS IS INDISPENSIBLE We must
Define oppression across racial/ethnic groups
Understand the structural arrangements that support and reinforce racial stratification