1 / 37

Update on AYP and Education YES! MAS-FPS Winter 2006

Update on AYP and Education YES! MAS-FPS Winter 2006. Michigan Department of Education. Accountability Components. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) No Child Left Behind Act State Accreditation – Education YES! Michigan Revised School Code. Scores Used for AYP.

helmut
Download Presentation

Update on AYP and Education YES! MAS-FPS Winter 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on AYP and Education YES!MAS-FPS Winter 2006 Michigan Department of Education

  2. Accountability Components • Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • No Child Left Behind Act • State Accreditation – Education YES! • Michigan Revised School Code

  3. Scores Used for AYP • The scores of all tested students must be used in the AYP determination • Valid scores in English language arts and mathematics cannot be ignored

  4. AYP Participation • Aggregate percent tested across all grades tested at the school Total Number Tested (grades 3+4+5) Total Number Enrolled (grades 3+4+5)

  5. AYP Proficiency • Aggregate percent proficient across all grades tested at the school Total Number Proficient (grades 3+4+5) Total Number Tested (grades 3+4+5)

  6. Michigan Performance Standards • Set by Panels of Michigan educators and citizens, approved by State Board • Panels will started with cut scores from 2004-05 impact data • Result will be vertically articulated standards across grades • The difficulty at a particular grade level will be very similar to the difficulty at adjacent grade levels

  7. Full Academic YearCurrent Definition • Students enrolled in the school for the two most recent semi-annual official count days • Students in their first year in a school because of the grade structure of the school if the student was, in the previous year, enrolled in another school in the same district • for example, a student “graduating” from a K-4 elementary school to a 5-8 middle school

  8. Full Academic Year 2005-06 • MDE will ask for Federal Approval of Full Academic Year OF 372 days • Lowest Grade in the School • Send Sores to: • MEAP feeder school, or • SRSD end of year enrollment

  9. AYP Targets 2005-06 • The published AYP targets will not change • MDE plans to set separate statewide AYP targets for each grade, and combine the grade level targets into a school target using a weighted average of the targets for the grades tested at the school

  10. Michigan AYP Targets

  11. AYP Target Examples • Grade Level Targets K-8 • AYP based on grades 3-8 compared to average of targets for grades 3, 4,5, 6, 7, and 8 • Grade Level Targets K-5 • AYP proficiency based on grades 3-6 compared to average of targets for grades 3, 4, 5, and 6

  12. Example Grade Level Targets

  13. Group Size • ALL schools are given an AYP status • Group Size applies to subgroups – NOT to all students

  14. Minimum Group SizeState Board Approved • If the number Tested (all grades) is • 100 or less - 30 • 101-125 - 35 • 126-150 - 40 • Over 150 - Minimum N (30) PLUS a Percentage (10%) of Grade Range Enrollment • If total enrollment is more than 3,000 • 1% Percent of Total Enrollment • District AYP • Maximum subgroup size is 200

  15. AYP and Students with Disabilities • Federal Rules – 1% cap – 2003 • Federal Flexibility - 2005 • Michigan was one of 3 states approved to use an existing test • New Federal Proposed Rules • Now available for comments • Will take effect in 2006-07

  16. Proposed Federal Rules • Published December 15, 2005 • Comment Period Ends February 28 • 2% cap applies to “Modified Achievement Standards” • reflect reduced breadth or depth of grade-level content • States would NOT be allowed to approve exceptions to the 2% cap

  17. AYP and Students with Disabilities • For 2005-06 we EXPECT that: • ALL Functional Independence assessments will count with no local cap (2% state cap) • Participation and Supported Independence Assessments will be subject to the 1% district level cap • New applications will not be needed for exception to the 1% cap

  18. AYP ReliabilityMargin of Error • Sources of Error • Measurement Error - APPROVED • Would the student score the same if tested again? • Standard Error of Measurement • Sampling Error – NOT APPROVED • Does the sample of students tested reflect the whole school? • Standard Error of Proportion with Finite Sampling Error Correction

  19. Provisional 2004-05

  20. Provisional 2005-06

  21. NCLB Graduation Rate • NCLB requires that AYP include a graduation rate based on the percentage of students that • Receive a REGULAR high school diploma • In the STANDARD number of years • AYP (including a graduation rate) is required for ALL schools

  22. Graduation Rates • Michigan has reported (since 1989) Graduation Rates using a single year of data • Michigan will move to a “cohort method” of reporting Graduation Rates • The “cohort method” will not be be used until the class of 2007 and will include rates for each student group

  23. Graduation Rate Example

  24. Graduation Rates for 2005-06 AYP • CEPI will use SRSD to calculate graduation rates for the class of 2005 • There will be no exclusion of alternative schools • CEPI will provide a data review and will receive data corrections (Spring 2006) • These rates will be used for AYP in 2006

  25. Graduation RatesCohort Method • Start with students enrolled in grade 9 for the first time • Develop rules for • Transfers Out • Transfers In • Measure percent graduated at • 4 year rate • 5 year rate

  26. State Accreditation • Education YES! Achievement • Indicators of School Performance

  27. Education YES!2004-05 Achievement Change Achievement Status Indicators

  28. Education YES! Achievement • New cut scores will be set for Achievement Status • MDE will explore options for reporting Achievement Change

  29. School Improvement Framework • Teaching & Learning • Leadership • Personnel and Professional Learning • School and Community Relations • Data and Information Management

  30. Indicators of School Performance • New rubrics being developed based on the School Improvement Framework • New School Self-Assessment based on the new rubrics • School Self-Assessment will be combined with hard data

  31. Indicators Schedulefor 2006-07 Implementation • Fall 2005 - Rubric Development • Winter 2005-06 - Editing • Spring 2006 - Field Testing • Fall 2006 - Software Testing and Training • Winter 2006-07 - Data Collection

  32. Indicators 2005-06 • Use MI- Plan to update • Self-Assessment Ratings • Evidence for Ratings • Data Collection February – March 2006

  33. Appeal Timelines • Elementary and Middle Schools • Appeal Window Opens late Spring (Late March or Early April) • Appeals close 30 days later • High Schools and District AYP • Appeal Window Opens early June • Appeals Close early July

  34. A Peek Toward 2007 • Measurement of Growth in adjacent grades • May be part of Education YES! • Federal Growth Task Force • Michigan Merit Examination • Single test administration date with single makeup date • Students testing at 10th graders in 2005-06 will need to test with MME in spring 2007

  35. Education YES!2006-07 and After Achievement Change Achievement Status Achievement Growth Indicators

  36. Education YES!2006-07 and After Achievement Growth Achievement Status Indicators

  37. Contact Information Paul Bielawski Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Michigan Department of Education PO Box 30008 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335-5784 bielawp@michigan.gov

More Related