1 / 14

Elections and Voting

Elections and Voting. Section 1: Election Campaigns. A. Functions of Elections 1. Symbolic Reassurance: Consent is given through elections 2. Allows us to pick gov’t. 3. Allows retrospective/negative voting: get rid of poor leaders/issues.

herbst
Download Presentation

Elections and Voting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Elections and Voting

  2. Section 1: Election Campaigns • A. Functions of Elections • 1. Symbolic Reassurance: Consent is given through elections • 2. Allows us to pick gov’t. • 3. Allows retrospective/negative voting: get rid of poor leaders/issues. • 4. Protect against Official Abuse: Forces politicians to have contact w/ people.

  3. B. Financing Election Campaigns • 1. Before 1970’s relied on contributions from wealthy individuals/groups (dependency): Federal Election Campaign Acts (1971, 74, 76) changed this: • a. Ceiling on campaign contributions • 1) Business organizations and labor unions prohibited from making direct contributions (led to PACs) • 2) Individuals limited to $2500/candidate/election ($45600 total) • 3) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: Ended Indirect Limits

  4. b. Political Action Committees • 1. Individuals may contribution $5000 to PACs • 2.PACs limited to no more than $5000 to candidate/election • c. Ceiling on Campaign Spending • 1.Funding for (subsidies) of Pres. Candidates: In 2008=$84.1million • 2.3rd party qualifies if receives 5% of vote from last or current election.

  5. 3. Delete • 4. No limit on personal spending by groups/individuals (Perot) • 5. No limit on indirect, independent spending by groups/individuals (soft $) • d. Disclosure • 1. Candidates, PACs, parties must keep records of contributions and report to the FEC all contributions over $100.

  6. Sec.2: Factors that influence voting • A. Long-term sociological and psychological factors influence the way people vote: • 1. Parents • 2. Place of Residence • 3. Regions of country they reside in • 4. Religion • 5. Race • 6. Age • 7. Income • 8. Education • 9. Occupation • 10. Gender

  7. Bloc-voting tendencies: people who posses similar characteristics tend to vote the same way. • Cross Pressured voter: person caught in conflicting elements in their life.

  8. B. Long-term factors, ppl i.d. w/ one party over the other in election after election. Party ID is #1 long-term factor that influences Am. Voting. • 1.Traditional Democratic Voting groups • a) Non-whites • b) Lower income • c) Lower education • d) Blue Collar • e) Jews/Catholics • f) NE, MW, W.Coast • g) Unions, teachers, environmentalists

  9. 2. Traditional Republican Voting Groups • a) Whites • b) College educated • c) Protestants • d) Higher income • e) South, West (non-coast) • f) Big Business, Professionals • C. Voting Patterns • Normal Vote: if all voted by party ID, each election would be 55%D and 45%R

  10. Strong Dem: Always vote, Always Dem. • Weak Dem, Independents: • Unsteady as to how and when vote, swayed by short-term, more likely to switch to other party, influenced by cand. Personality than deep seated love of party. • Weak Rep: Always Vote, Always Rep. • Strong Rep: Always vote, Always Rep.

  11. Pres. Elections generate more short-term than other, thus more defection by weak dem. • Off-year elec.: less short-term forces, lower voter turnout, weak dems and indep. Stay home. • Off Year: three most imp. Party ID, incumbency, Name recogn. • Straight-Ticket: All same party. • Split-Ticket: Vote for some of each party, Wk. Dem. And Indep. More likely.

  12. Bush and Dukakis

  13. 1992: Clinton (D) v. Bush (R) v. Perot (Ind) • 1) Clinton’s image – youth, charisma, appeal to female vote. • 2) Quayle hurt REP. • 3) ECONOMY • 4) Perot got 19% of popular vote, hurt both parties.

  14. Clinton and Perot

More Related