1 / 40

Presenter : Leanne Dowse

Trajectories in to the criminal justice system for y oung people with complex needs: Experiences in early life and out of home c are. Presenter : Leanne Dowse Research Team: Eileen Baldry , Leanne Dowse, Jung- Sook Lee, Terry Cumming, Iva Strnadová , Han Xu , Julian Trofimovs.

herman-frazier
Download Presentation

Presenter : Leanne Dowse

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trajectories in to the criminal justice system for young people with complex needs: Experiences in early life and out of home care Presenter : Leanne Dowse Research Team: Eileen Baldry, Leanne Dowse, Jung-SookLee, Terry Cumming, Iva Strnadová, Han Xu, Julian Trofimovs Association of Child Welfare Agencies Conference 2014, SMC, Sydney, 18-20 August

  2. Presentation Outline Context of the problem Backgroundto the MHDCD in the CJS project Selected key findings: pathways & case studies Discussion/Conclusions: understanding and addressing complex needs in people with disabilities in the CJS

  3. Context of the problem Concern with the social exclusion and criminalisation of a group of young people with disabilities. As young people (and later as adults) this group figure significantly in policing, justice and prisons, both as victims and offenders. Needs are complex, trajectory into the CJS begins early in life. Responsive welfare provision and early intervention can be effective in addressing social exclusion and reducing vulnerability for young people at risk of entering the criminal justice system. BUT specific experience for young people who have complex needs and are at risk of CJS involvement is poorly understood In Australia and comparable jurisdictions current systemic and welfare responses appear to have only limited impact on preventing early contact from escalating into a cycle of incarceration and re-incarceration. Need for multi-systemic pathway understanding & advocacy

  4. People with Mental Health Disorders and Cognitive Disability (MHDCD) in the Criminal Justice System study ARC Linkage Project 2007-2010 UNSW • CIs: Eileen Baldry, Leanne Dowse, Ian Webster • PIs: Tony Butler, Simon Eyland, Jim Simpson • Partner Organisations: Corrective Services NSW, Justice Health, NSW Police, Housing NSW, NSW Council for Intellectual Disability, Juvenile Justice NSW ARC Linkage Project 2011-2014 Indigenous Australians with mental health disorders and cognitive disability in the CJS • CIs: Eileen Baldry, Leanne Dowse, Julian Trollor, Patrick Dodson • Partner Organisations: Justice Health, Legal Aid, NSW Housing, ADHC Range of other ‘nested’ studies eg. Lifecourse costing; Use of S32; Acquired Brain Injury; Youny People with Disability in the CJS; Victimisation experiences http://www.mhdcd.unsw.edu.au/

  5. Study approach Method: Innovative data linkage and merging Cohort: 2001 Inmate Health Survey & CSNSW Statewide Disability Service database – purposive sample not representative Data on each individual drawn from: • The Centre for Health Research in CJS Health NSW • NSW Department of Corrective Services – adult custody • BOCSAR – reoffending database - courts • NSW Police – events, charges and custody • Juvenile Justice – clients and custody • Housing NSW – application and tenancy • ADHC – disability service • Legal Aid NSW – advice, application • NSW Health (mortality, pharmacotheraphy, hospital admissions) • Community Services – out of home care

  6. SQL server, relational dataset

  7. MHDCD Study Cohort by Diagnoses

  8. Diagnostic profile of the MHDCD Cohort Full Cohort N=2,731 Intellectual Disability (IQ <70) N=680 Borderline Intellectual Disability (IQ 70-80) N=783 Mental health disorder N=1642 Substance abuse disorder N= 1985 No diagnosis N= 174 Acquired brain injury identified for 19% N=511 Women = 11% Indigenous Australians = 25% ~40% had been Juvenile Justice clients 69% of the cohort have complex/multiple diagnoses (groups not mutually exclusive)

  9. Mental Health & Cognitive Impairment in JJ Juvenile detainees: 87% at least 1 psychological disorder. JJNSW most recent health survey: • ID (20%) Aboriginal young people IQ below 70, 7% ID non-Aboriginal young people (both sig above the norm). • 1/3rd (32%)borderline ID (IQ 70 to 79), with Aboriginal 39% vs non Aboriginal 26% (again sig above norm) (Indiget al 2010 Young People in Custody Health Survey)

  10. Defining complex needs Associated with vulnerability and social marginalisation. Multiple interlocking experiences and factors that span health and social issues (Rankin & Regan 2004). Includes: (a) mental health disorder; (b) cognitive disability including intellectual and developmental disability and acquired brain injury; (c) physical disability; (d) behavioural difficulties; (e) precarious housing; (f) social isolation; (g) family dysfunction; (h) problematic drug and/or alcohol use (i) risk of harm in early life (k) early educational disengagement (Archer, 2009; AIHW, 2012; Baldry, Dowse, & Clarence, 2012;Carney, 2006; Draine & Salzer, 2002; Hamilton, 2010; Keene, 2001MacDonald, 2012).

  11. Key selected findings: the experience of young people with mental health and cognitive disability in the CJS

  12. Education Those with complex support needs and cognitive disability had significantly lower educational attainment

  13. School Expulsion: MHDCD cohort compared with Inmate Health Survey Sample Higher proportion of those in the MHDCD cohort both males (44%v 39%) and females (35%v29%) had ever been expelled from school. Much larger % reported being suspended.

  14. Experiences in education • Diagnosed groups in the MHDCD cohort have even lower levels of education than general prisoner population. • Those with some form of Cognitive Disability have the worst levels of education. • Complex groups: over 80% have no formal qualification with majority leaving school without completing Yr10 • Comparison between MHDCD cohort and non-MHDCD prisoner (HIS) cohort shows that those in the MHDCD cohort had higher proportions • leaving school without a qualification • being expelled and suspended from school • attending special school (12% V 8%)

  15. Out Of Home Care: MHDCD cohort by diagnostic category

  16. Family Context 23% of the MHDCD cohort had been in OOHC compared with 19% non-MHDCD cohort Of those who had been in OOHC 60% have complex diagnoses, with 80% of this group having a cognitive impairment. No difference in raised by family between ages 0-10 but from 11-16 significant difference where MHDCD group (45%) more likely to move into OOHC than non-MHDCD (40%). Intergenerational disadvantage greater for MHDCD cohort • Larger proportion of MHDCD cohort (18%) having a parent who had been incarcerated compared to non-MHDCD cohort (12%) • Higher proportion of MHDCD cohort (11%) having a parent who had also been in OOHC compared with non-MHDCD cohort (9%).

  17. OOHC placements and average days in placement across diagnostic categories

  18. OOHC and JJ involvement - proportion Higher proportion of those in the MHDCD cohort who have been in OOHC have been in custody as a Juvenile.

  19. OOHC and JJ involvement - frequency Higher frequency of DJJ custody episodes for those in the MHDCD cohort who have been in OOHC.

  20. OOHC and Gender Females in the MHDCD cohort who have been in OOHC are more likely than males to have been in JJ custody and in adult custody

  21. OOHC and Indigenous Australians Higher proportion of Indigenous Australians in the MHDCD cohort have been in OOHC as compared with non-Indigenous.

  22. OOHC and Police Contact Higher average number of Police contacts for those in the MHDCD cohort who have been in OOHC (90 contacts) than for those with no OOHC history (48 contacts).

  23. OOHC and Adult Custody Higher average number of episodes of adult custody for those in the MHDCD cohort who have been in OOHC (7.5 episodes) than for those with no OOHC history (6.7 episodes).

  24. Impact of out of home care Those in the MHDCD cohort who had been in OHC had: 84% of the OOHC group have complex needs 90% of this group has cognitive impairment Younger age at first police contact Twice as many police contacts over their lives Twice as many custodial episodes over their lives Three times as likely to have been incarcerated as a juvenile Aboriginal Australians more likely to have been in OOHC

  25. Eddie Indigenous man now in his late 30s. Diagnosed with ID, Borderline Personality Disorder and AOD Poly drug use from age 6including alcohol, cannabis, prescription drugs, amphetamines, heroin, methadone and buprenorphine. Victim of violence and abuse from a young age. He was first placed in OOHC at age 9 for 2 weeks, and over the following 6 years was placed in 9 different foster homes lasting between 5 days to 2 weeks. First police contact at age 11 and first custodial episode at age 13. Constantly suspended and expelled from schools and from age 13 does not attend any school and was known to distribute drugs when at school. From age 14, moves between foster care, a youth refuge and his aunt’s house. All placements break down due to his aggressive behaviour and his assaults on others.He tells police that he is “having problems coping with life generally, and that he is not able to get on with anyone and everyone is against him”. Much of his contact with police is related to his drug use and break and enter and robbery offences, often violent. As a young person regularly imprisoned for breaching bail conditions which state that he can only go out accompanied by a responsible adult. Regular self-harm and suicide attempts from a young age and history of overdose. As an adult regularly scheduled under the MHA and hospitalized for suicide and self-harm. Multiple custody episode for theft and when not in custody often noted by police as NFPA.

  26. Eddie: Estimated lifecourse institutional costs Baldry, E., Dowse, L., McCausland, R. & Clarence, M. (2012) Lifecourse institutional costs of homelessness for vulnerable groups. Report for the National Homelessness Research Agenda 2009-2013 http://www.mhdcd.unsw.edu.au/sites/www.mhdcd.unsw.edu.au/files/u18/Lifecourse-Institutional-Costs-of-Homelessness-final-report.pdf

  27. Disability Service • Of those diagnosed ID only 23% were Ageing Disability and Home Care (ADHC) clients • Of the BID group 4% were ADHC clients • Very low rate (15%) of CD in cohort with ADHC services • Only 10/709 JJ CD group ADHC clients • 79% of ADHC clients imprisoned prior to becoming a client. ie. were diagnosed and referred for the first time whilst in prison.

  28. Housing Assistance Significant numbers of the complex groups experienced homelessness and unstable housing as young people Significant numbers had parent(s) in public housing Significant numbers accommodated in refuges and other crisis accommodation as young people.

  29. Police Contacts People with Complex Cognitive Disability had significantly more police contacts over their lives, starting young, and significantly higher rates of police contacts per year

  30. First police contact & JJ Av. age first Police & JJ contact & number police contacts prior to custody: All CD significantly higher police contacts before JJ client & were younger at first police contact and younger at first custody than no diagnosis group.

  31. Age at first record in DJJ involvements Many in this MHDCD subgroup have lowest minimum age possible for DJJ detention (10) and informal contacts below the legal threshold for formal charging

  32. JJ Custodial episodes & LOS CD complex significantly more JJ custodial episodes than MH & no diagnosis \. All groups significantly shorter av days than no diagnosis groups (largely remand)

  33. Offences Average National Offence Index rating for all offences was in lowest (least serious) 10% Most common: road traffic & theft (50% of all convictions), justice, public order & acts intended to cause injury (~ 10% each)

  34. Pathways: iterative, looping, cycling, compounding

  35. New Conceptualisation of Disability in CJS Highly disadvantaged places early in life & funneled into a liminal marginalised community/criminal justice space (Baldry 2013) Not falling through the cracks, rather, as young people on the conveyor belt / given a ticket on the CJS train. Systematic and patterned (Baldry 2013). The lack of appropriate support and services and the use of control agencies for persons experiencing multiple disadvantages together with mental and/ or cognitive disability, compounds these life issues creating complex needs(Baldry & Dowse 2012).

  36. Understanding complex support needs for young people with cognitive disability in contact with CJS Complex set of vulnerabilities across individual, social and institutional domains, work together to bring people with complex support needs into contact with the CJS. Many risk factors are known and identifiable from a young age Pathways into the CJS for these young people with complex needs are multi-factorial and multi-stage (Baldry 2013). Difficult for currently disconnected service systems to identify and address. Failure to address contributory conditions often precipitate further involvement in the criminal justice system Poor coordination across areas of criminal justice, welfare and human services and education, appears to result in responsibility for management often falling to the criminal justice system (Baldry & Dowse, 2013).

  37. Addressing support needs for people with mental health and cognitive disability in contact with the CJS Comprehensive response means addressing models and practices in individual and family support, service system cohesion, and overarching policy direction. Premised on support not criminalisation. Responses specifically recognise and address complex needs as pervasive and interlocking rather than simply co-occurring, and therefore cannot to be addressed in isolation from each other. Service providers face a challenge in recognising the presence of complex support needs in their clients and ensuring assessment and early intervention. Policy makers to enact strategies that enable shared recognition and understanding of the nature of complex support needs, including common criteria and language. Specific cross-portfolio integration promoting collaborative and coordinated service response across education, child protection, disability and criminal justice system agencies.

  38. References Archer, W. D. (2009). Introduction: Challenging the school to prison pipeline. New York Law School Law Review,54, 875-908. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2012). Children and young people at risk of social exclusion: Links between homelessness, child protection and juvenile justice. Data linkage series no. 13. Cat. no. CSI 13. Canberra: AIHW Baldry, E. (2013) Pathways from school to prison: Intellectual disability, mental health and school education. Paper presented to Forum on intellectual disability, mental health and school education. UNSW May 31. Baldry, E. & Dowse, L. (2012) Pathways into and avenues out of criminal justice for young people with cognitive and mental disabilities. UNSW, Public Lecture. December 6th. Baldry, E. & Dowse, L. (2013) Compounding mental and cognitive disability and disadvantage: police as care managers in Duncan Chappell (ed) Policing and the Mentally Ill: International Perspectives. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group. Baldry, E., Dowse, L., & Clarence, M. (2012). People with intellectual and other cognitive disability in the criminal justice system: Report for NSW Family and Community Services Ageing, Disability and Home Carehttp://www.adhc.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0003/264054/Intellectual_and_cognitive_disability_in_criminal_justice_system.pdf

  39. References Carney, T. (2006) Complex Needs at the Boundaries of Mental Health, Justice and Welfare: Gatekeeping Issues in Managing Chronic Alcoholism Treatment? Current Issues in Criminal Justice 17(3): 347-361. Draine, J., Salzer, M. S., Culhane, D.P., and Hadley, T.R. (2002) Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 53(5): 565-573 Hamilton, M. (2010) People with Complex Needs and the Criminal Justice System Current Issues in Criminal Justice 22(2): 307-324 Indig, D., Vecchiato, C., Haysom, L., Beilby, R., Carter, J., Champion, U., Gaskin, C., Heller, E., Kumar, S., Mamone, N., Muir, P., Van Den Dolder, P. & Whitton, G. (2009) NSW Young People in Custody Health Survey: Full Report. Justice Health. Keene, J. (2001) Clients with Complex Needs: Interprofessional Practice. Oxford: Blackwell MacDonald, (2012). Macdonald, S. J. (2012). "Journey's end": Statistical pathways into offending for adults with specific learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 3, 85-97. Rankin, J & Regan, S (2004), Meeting Complex Needs: The Future of Social Care, The Institute for Public Policy Research

  40. Contact Associate Professor Leanne Dowse Chair in Intellectual Disability and Behaviour Support School of Social Sciences UNSW Australia L.Dowse@unsw.edu.au MHDCD Project website UNSW http://www.mhdcd.unsw.edu.au/

More Related