1 / 22

Bilateral Contract and Settlement Market Rules for CMS Phase I

Bilateral Contract and Settlement Market Rules for CMS Phase I. Presented to NEPOOL Markets Committee January 23, 2001. Drafting Principles. CMS Phase I Rules (Contracts & Settlements) drafted using Sept, 2000 draft of “End-State” CMS/MSS Rules. Cross references to RNA used where possible

hester
Download Presentation

Bilateral Contract and Settlement Market Rules for CMS Phase I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bilateral Contract and Settlement Market Rules for CMS Phase I Presented to NEPOOL Markets Committee January 23, 2001 Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  2. Drafting Principles • CMS Phase I Rules (Contracts & Settlements) drafted using Sept, 2000 draft of “End-State” CMS/MSS Rules. • Cross references to RNA used where possible • All Settlements Calculations contained in single section • All Bilateral Contracts contained in single section Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  3. Scope of Presentation • Overview of Rules • Bilateral Contracts – Section 4 • Settlements Calculations – Section 6 • Numerical Examples Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  4. Overview of Rules • Bilateral Contracts and Settlement Treatment • Real-Time Market Settlements • NCPC Calculations • NCPC Rules will be included when finalized • FCR Settlements • Marginal Loss and Congestion Revenue • Inadvertent Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  5. Types of Bilateral Contracts • Relevant sections • Section 4.2 covers basic rules and timelines • Types • Unit, System, Obligation Transfer, Load Asset Contract and External (ICAP Only) • Unit Contract must specify Location • System Contract must specify Location • Obligation Transfer Contract must settle where actual load obligation resides • Above Continue to be financial instruments only • External must link with Supply Offer or Demand Bid at External Node Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  6. Bilateral Contract Submittal • Section 4.3 describes submittal process • Appendix-4A sets out content requirements • Submittal similar to today except: • No External Contracts other than ICAP • No Pre-Determined Conditions • No Non-Standard Provisions • Linked Dispatchable and Firm Contracts retained • Validation similar to today Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  7. Bilateral Contract Settlement Treatment • Section 6.3 describes settlement treatment • Settlement treatment similar to today except • Location specific for Energy • Seller incurs an increased financial obligation for Unit, System, Obligation Transfer and Load Asset (Operating Reserve) Contracts • Seller incurs a reduction in financial obligation for Load Asset (Energy) Contract • System and Obligation Transfer Contracts remain dispatchable Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  8. Real-Time Settlements Sections 6.4, 6.5 and 6.6 Settlement Quantities Supply Obligation Payments Settlement Obligation Payments Net Settlements Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  9. Real-Time Settlement Quantities • Real-Time Base Supply Obligation and Base Settlement Obligation quantities for Energy as submitted by Assigned Meter Reader • Electrical Load calculated for External Nodes, Nodes and Load Zones. • Real-Time Ancillary Service Supply Obligation based on designated amounts • Schedule changes at External Nodes accounted for • Dispatchable Loads pay Nodal, all other Loads pay Zonal Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  10. Real-Time Supply Obligation Payments • Energy Settlements based on Nodal Prices • Ancillary Service Settlements based on A/S Clearing Price • Unit Contract Transactions included • Load Asset Transactions (Reserve) included Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  11. Real-Time Settlement Obligation Payments - Energy • Payments from Participants based on Settlement Obligation as modified for Bilateral Transactions • Energy Settlements based on Locational Prices • Nodal for Dispatchable Load • Zonal for all other Load Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  12. Real-Time Energy Settlement - Examples • Examples • Energy Settlement with Unit Contract • Energy Settlement with System Contract Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  13. Real-Time Energy Settlement – Unit Contract Example Generator Load Zone A = CP = $35 Node A CP = $30 400 Mws 50% UC Sale at Zone A 400 Mws Gen Supply Obligation at Zone A = -200 Load Supply Obligation at Zone A = 200 Load Settlement Obligation at Zone A = -400 Gen Supply Obligation at Node A = 400 Gen Settlements at Zone A (-200 x 35) = -$7000 Load Settlements at Zone A (+200 x 35) = +$7,000 (-400 x 35) = -$14,000 Gen Settlements At Node A: (400 x $30) = $12,000 Note: $2,000 ($14,000 - $12,000) excess collected = Congestion Cost -$7000 Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  14. Real-Time Energy Settlement – System Contract Example Generator Load 100 MW System Contract Sale at Zone A (Gen is seller) Zone A = CP = $35 Node A CP = $30 400 Mws 400 Mws Gen Settlement Obligation at Zone A = -100 MWs Load Settlement Obligation at Zone A = (-400 + 100) = -300 Gen Supply Obligation at Node A = 400 MWs Gen Settlements At Node A: (400 x $30) = +$12,000 Note: $2,000 ($14,000 - $12,000) excess collected = Congestion Cost Gen Settlements at Zone A (-100 x 35) = -$3500 Load Settlements at Zone A (-300 x 35) = -$10,500 Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  15. Real-Time Energy Settlement – Obligation Transfer Contract Example Generator Load Zone A = CP = $35 50% Obligation Transfer Contract – Gen is Seller Node A CP = $30 400 Mws 400 Mws Note: Must Settle at Zone A Gen Settlement Obligation at Zone A = (-400 x .5) = -200 MWs Load Settlement Obligation at Zone A = (-400 – (-400 x.5)) = -200 MWs Gen Supply Obligation at Node A = 400 MWs Gen Settlements At Node A: (400 x $30) = +$12,000 Note: $2,000 ($14,000 - $12,000) excess collected = Congestion Cost Gen Settlements at Zone A (-200 x $35) = -$7,000 Load Settlements at Zone A (-200 x $35) = -$7,000 Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  16. Net Monthly Settlement • Section 6.16 • Just a summation of all Trading Interval calculations performed for a Billing Period • Adjusted Net Interchange calculation retained (Section 6.15). • Posturing and EET’s • Supply Obligation payments and Settlement Obligation payments netted for each Participant. Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  17. Settlement Obligation Payments – Ancillary Services • Sections 6.7 and 6.8 • A/S Clearing Prices calculated based on Co-optimized results. • Payments from Participants based on sum of Real-Time Supply Obligation payments made to Participants • AGC and Operating Reserve • AGC payment based on REG share of total AGC requirement • Operating Reserve payment based on MW share of total Operating Reserve Requirement • System Contracts and Obligation Transfer Contracts included as an adjustment to MW Settlement Obligations Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  18. Marginal Loss Revenue • Section 6.13.1 • Calculated based on comparing for each Trading Interval: • Sum of Supply Obligations payments (less Congestion Component portion) and • Sum of Settlement Obligation payments (less Congestion Component portion) • Surplus, if any, is allocated in proportion to total Electrical Load (Nodal + Zonal +External Node). Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  19. FCR Settlements – Target FCR Payments • Section 6.12 • FCR Auction to be developed • Payments to FCR Holders made if: • Congestion Component of Locational Price of specified destination Location is greater than Congestion Component of Locational Price of specified origin Location • Payment based on MW amount of FCR and difference in Congestion Components of Locational Prices. • Payments from FCR Holders collected if: • Congestion Component of Locational Price of specified destination Location is less than Congestion Component of Locational Price of specified origin Location • Payment collected based on MW amount of FCR and difference in Congestion Components of Locational Prices Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  20. Actual FCR Payments – Revenue Adequacy • Section 6.13.2 • Actual FCR Payments equal Target FCR Payments if Congestion Revenue is adequate • Revenue adequacy calculated on a monthly basis by calculating Congestion Revenue collected in Real-Time • If Revenue Collected >= Target FCR Payments, Revenue is adequate, excess added to Congestion Revenue Fund Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  21. FCR Settlements – Revenue Adequacy – Cont. • If Revenue Collected + Congestion Revenue Fund balance < Target FCR Payments, then Ratio down Target Payments to match • Congestion Revenue Fund balance at end of year used to make FCR Holders whole if Actual FCR Payments less than Target Barker, Dunn & Rossi

  22. Inadvertent • Section 6.14 • Inadvertent Settlements remain the same as today except: • Inadvertent Mwhrs are priced out for each Trading interval at each External Nodes at the External Node Price. Barker, Dunn & Rossi

More Related