1 / 16

The Luggage EE3GP Group Project 30 credit compulsory module ( MEng 3 only)

The Luggage EE3GP Group Project 30 credit compulsory module ( MEng 3 only). Coordinator: Dr Costas Constantinou Supervisors: Dr Costas Constantinou, Dr Peter Gardner, Dr Stuart Hillmansen, Dr Tim Jackson and Dr Ed Tarte. Aims & Objectives. Hard science; no spoon-feeding

hester
Download Presentation

The Luggage EE3GP Group Project 30 credit compulsory module ( MEng 3 only)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The LuggageEE3GP Group Project30 credit compulsory module (MEng 3 only) Coordinator: Dr Costas Constantinou Supervisors: Dr Costas Constantinou, Dr Peter Gardner, Dr Stuart Hillmansen, Dr Tim Jackson and Dr Ed Tarte

  2. Aims & Objectives • Hard science; no spoon-feeding • Advantages & disadvantages of group working • Mature from a group into a team • Develop initiative • both the task and process are only very loosely defined • Introduce essential new skills not covered elsewhere • research skills • using data books • using new microprocessors • etc. • Learn to search for information in libraries & other repositories • distinguishing between reliable and unreliable sources of information

  3. Academia vs. “real world” • GP reflects real-world job experience for engineers • No on choice on who is in “your” group • Failure of social dynamics (e.g. finger-pointing, finding scapegoats, etc.) = failure of group project (& whole degree) • You have to work to a budget • You have to work to deadlines • “It works” is not good enough – your product will have to compete with others • You have to deal with a “customer” who knows what he wants but won’t pin in down to a specification • Performance criteria same as those applied to professional engineers

  4. Useful information • Your laboratory is in room N.216 (UG project laboratory) • hot-benched, no specialised hardware and software provided • Budget of £1000 per group • can be increased (very little), but you need to make a convincing, detailed case as to why and by how much • No other useful information!

  5. 1st field demonstration & 1st presentation Wed, 7 Dec 2011 (wk 11, autumn) Interim group report + CVs 12 noon, Fri, 9 Dec 2011 (wk 11, autumn) 2nd field demonstration & 2nd presentation Wed, 21 Mar 2012 (wk 11, spring) Final group report + CVs 12 noon, Mon, 16 Apr 2012 (wk 3, Easter) Poster (project open day) + Mark apportionment Thu, 26 April 2012 (wk 1, summer) 5% 5% 10+10% 67.5% 2.5% (peer) Dates for your diary

  6. Don’t • Plagiarise • Produce “hot air” • Rely just on powerpoint for presentations • Exceed submission page/word limits • Submit late (–5% per day) • Break any law: • health and safety • radio transmissions • laws I haven’t thought of!

  7. Mark apportionment • Read Appendix C of the project handout very, very carefully indeed • Marks must be accompanied by justification of apportionment to be given to external examiners • If you decide to deviate significantly from the suggested procedure you must seek my approval for your scheme

  8. Rules • Keep the entire exercise legal • Please respect university property and grounds • Keep radio transmissions compliant with UK spectrum usage laws • During outdoors work and/or demonstrations wear sensible shoes and clothing • Perform a real risk assessment and stop other members of your team from getting into trouble • No other rules at this stage, but we reserve the right to make changes or add to these rules until noon of Friday week 2 of the Spring term

  9. The 2011 – 2012 Project The Luggage • Inspired by one of the characters in Sir Terry Pratchett’sDiscworld comic fantasy novels • The Luggage follows its owner everywhere and has been described as “half suitcase, half homicidal maniac”; it’s intelligent and autonomous • Like all luggage, it's constantly getting lost and having to track its owner down

  10. You are required to design, prototype and demonstrate an autonomous piece of luggage such as a suitcase or a trunk capable of: • Identifying its owner at all times • Following its owner around an airport while avoiding passengers and obstacles (no homicidal behaviour thanks) • Must be autonomous/self-propelled • Negotiating up to three steps (optional) • Operate without recharging for a period of up to 1.5 hours • Should not exceed a gross weight of 23 kg and must accommodate a minimum of 15 kg of personal possessions • Its dimensions must comply with standard airline restrictions for checked-in luggage • Its components must not violate airline safety regulations (e.g. Does not contain lead acid batteries, or compressed gases, etc.) • Must be de-activated once it’s been checked in • Must not have protruding parts once it has been deactivated • Must identify its presence to its owner once it is on a carousel at the arrivals hall

  11. The teams Group A: Supervisor PG

  12. The teams Group B: Supervisor TJJ

  13. The teams Group C: Supervisor ET

  14. The teams Group D: Supervisor CCC

  15. The teams Group E: Supervisor SH

  16. Good luck!

More Related