1 / 11

Clear line of sight: Aligning budgets, Estimates and accounts

Clear line of sight: Aligning budgets, Estimates and accounts. Ken Beeton & Doug Rayner OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium – 3 March 2008. The opportunity (1).

hetties
Download Presentation

Clear line of sight: Aligning budgets, Estimates and accounts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clear line of sight: Aligning budgets, Estimates and accounts Ken Beeton & Doug Rayner OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium – 3 March 2008

  2. The opportunity (1) • “The Government will simplify its reporting to Parliament, ensuring that it reports in a more consistent fashion, in line with the fiscal rules, at all three stages in the process: on plans, Estimates and actual expenditure outturns” • “The Governance of Britain” July 2007

  3. The opportunity (2) • “We recommend that the Government … replace the current system of authorisation based primarily on Estimates with one linked more clearly with the public expenditure planning and control system, so that the House of Commons would … authorise Departmental Expenditure Limits and … Annually Managed Expenditure” • Treasury Committee Report on the 2007 CSR, June 2007

  4. The problem we’re aiming to solve • Different bases on which financial information is presented to Parliament and other stakeholders • Government financial documents published in different formats, on many different occasions: • - different sets of numbers • - makes spending control and Parliamentary monitoring • more difficult • - value for money incentives are weakened or non-existent • - accountability not straightforward – makes public debate • more difficult • - burdensome and costly

  5. The different frameworks, and the purposes they serve • The various frameworks have different purposes and rules: • National Accounts: the fiscal rules are measured by reference to the National Accounts • Budgets: are used to control public spending and need to align with the National Accounts to support the fiscal rules • Estimates: seek annual Parliamentary authority for departments’ spending that isn’t authorised elsewhere • Resource Accounts: report departments’ actual spend for the year on a ‘commercial’ basis, adapted for the public sector, and compare outturn with Estimates

  6. Budgets Estimates Resource Accounts The problem we are trying to solve – Budgets, Estimates & Accounts Less than 0.1 -0.1 0.2 346 35 184 -5 Amounts included under each system (£ billion)

  7. The problem we are trying to solve – Reporting

  8. What success might look like – Developing the Vision • “To create a single, coherent financial regime, that is effective, efficient and transparent, enhances accountability to Parliament and the public, and underpins the Government’s fiscal framework, incentivises good value for money and supports delivery of excellent public services by allowing managers to manage.”

  9. What success might look like – what this Vision would mean • Significant benefits of better alignment: • A simpler and more transparent system, with a single set of numbers that can be tracked through the system from start to finish • A significantly enhanced ability to control public spending in line with Government’s controls and the way departments manage themselves • Improved risk management and stronger value for money incentives • Two or, at most, three main documents presented to Parliament by departments each year • Better government, through improved democratic involvement for, and accountability to, Parliament and the public • Cost effective financial regime, with no unnecessary burdens

  10. The “Top Down” Approach • Flexibility may be needed in some areas: • Can we meet the fiscal rules in other ways? • Are adaptations to IFRS acceptable in some areas to achieve alignment? • All misalignments must be challenged rigorously, and not pursued only if result would cause serious damage or be manipulable • Any necessary residual reconciliations must be as simple as possible

  11. Next Steps • Steering Committee and Project Board in place • Timetable – aiming to: • - complete detailed project planning by March 2008, • including early identification of legal risks • - 2008-09: negotiate design of new operating model, • leading to possible consultation paper • - 2009-10: implementation planning • - 2010-11: commence delivery (possibly phased), • subject to resolving legal and other issues

More Related