1 / 34

Venera SDT Meeting 6-7 October 2015 Moscow, Russia

Different scenarios of the “ Venera -D” mission KIAM Ballistic Center Team ( Keldysh Institute Of Applied Mathematics RAS). Grushevskii A.V. Golubev Yu.F., Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G., Tuchin D.A. Different scenarios of the “Venera-D” mission. Venera SDT Meeting 6-7 October 2015

hgreen
Download Presentation

Venera SDT Meeting 6-7 October 2015 Moscow, Russia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Different scenarios of the “Venera-D” missionKIAM Ballistic Center Team (Keldysh Institute Of Applied Mathematics RAS)

  2. Grushevskii A.V.Golubev Yu.F., Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G., Tuchin D.A.Different scenarios of the “Venera-D” mission Venera SDT Meeting 6-7 October 2015 Moscow, Russia Keldysh Institute of Applied MathematicsRussian Academy of Sciences

  3. 1.Venusis very appealing not only for artists, but for leading Earth scientists • Hesperus

  4. 3. Venusian missions are convenient and interesting on one's Jack and on the side for mission design • The Vega program was a series of Venus missions that also took advantage of the appearance of Comet Halley in 1986. Vega 1 and Vega 2 were unmanned spacecraft launched in December 1984. They had a two-part mission to investigate Venus and also flyby Halley's Comet. • VEGA

  5. Booster Venusian Gravity Assists V - Venusian GAMs Cassini Cruise trajectory • From Vouagers and “Cassini” to Jupiter Icy Moon Explorer (JUICE) and “Laplas-P” • EVEE gravity assists –JUICE (2026) spacecraft to visit the Jovian system focused on studying three of Jupiter's Galilean moons • VVEJ gravity assists – Cassini mission (1997)

  6. Cranking Venus Gravity assists • “Interhelio-Probe” Polar-Ecliptic Patrol probes on the Sun • Solar Orbiter (“SolO”) • are planned Sun-observing satellites, under development by theESA and Russia. They are intended to perform detailed measurements of the inner heliosphere and perform close observations of the polar regions of the Sun • “Pumping” E-Gravity Assists • “Cranking” V-Gravity Assists • Solar Orbiter

  7. Gravity assists are very useful • For the VenusianOrbiters and Landers delivery the decreasing of the spacecraft’s velocity relative Venus demanded. • Not booster gravity assists!

  8. Venusian missions • Transited • Orbital • Landing • Orbiters & Landers For “Red” scenarios Total Delta-V is very expensive (Boosting+Reducing) We can to exchange some reducing DeltaVon the Total time of flight with help of: Gravity Assists; Aerobracking; Ballistic Capture (Belbruno); High-Altitude GAMs (Ross, Sheress)

  9. Hohmann strategy (very expensive)

  10. Hohmann strategy (very expensive) (axes Ra-Rp in A.U.)

  11. Hohmann strategy (very expensive)

  12. Hohmann strategy (very expensive)

  13. Hohmann strategy (very expensive) (axes Ra-Rp in A.U.)

  14. Standard scenarios • The report presents the count results for launce windows on the time span from 2020 to 2026. There are deter-mined power characteristics of flights and selected optimal windows. There are given results of calculations for the Descent Module destination areas on the Venus surface. Various variants of the subsatellite separation from the base SC are considered. These variants are distinguished by orbit periods. And the question of the SC motion determination in the Venus artificial satellite orbit is considered as well.

  15. Possible Launch windows and their Total Rates

  16. Isolines of the Total velocity rate for the 2020 Launch window(“Porkchop Plots”) OX- Launch Data, OY – The Cruise Duration (days) Red Cross – an optimal data (11.01.2020) and the cruise duration (196 days)

  17. TP-graphs reducing strategy

  18. TP-graphs reducing strategy

  19. V-infinity reduction is a very specific problem I

  20. Ti-Criterion (Tisserand’s Criterion) Restricted 3 Body ProblemJacobi Integral J Tisserand’s Parameter Ti (see R.Russell, S.Campagnola) “Isoinfine”(It’s mean ”Captivity”)

  21. II. Gravity Assists Maneuver (GAM)

  22. T-P-graph for “Interhelio-Probe”

  23. Tisserand-Poincare graph

  24. Trajectories Beam Selection • We need the criterion of bulk selection of encounters with V-infinity reduction • Semi-code is “not_V” ^ “V” • The “Full Conjunction Code” is: “Not_Venus” + ”Venus” + ”Venus” Or “E” ^ ”E” ^ …^ ”E” ^ ”V”

  25. Real Beam searching (“Sheafs”)(axes Ra-Rp in RJ) Rebounds E^V millions modes Rebounds-ReRebounds E^V^V thousands modes

  26. Using the TRAJECTORY BEAM method for Gravity Assists Sequences Determination

  27. Bi-Tisserand graphThe “moment of target-switch”determination

  28. The Delivery of Lander-SC (CA) scheme

  29. The surface of ballistic reachability for launch in 2020-2026 2020 y. 2021 y. 2023 y. 2026 y. 2024 y.

  30. The area of ballistic reachability for lunch in 2020 • OX-Latitude OY- Longitude of the landing point • OX- longitude • Earth-Descent Module-Venus (red), • Solar- Descent Module-Venus( blue)

  31. Period’s variants of main SC and sub-satellite

  32. Var. 1 Orbit elements of the Venusian artifical satellite orbit

  33. Conclusions • 1. For transit missions not all Venusian surface is available. Orbiters are demanded • 2. High inclined or polar orbits near Venus • 3. We can to exchange some reducing DeltaVon the total time of flight with help of: -Gravity Assists; -Aerobracking; -Ballistic Capture

  34. Thank you for your attention !

More Related