1 / 6

EPA Organic Labeling

Discover the EPA's Organic Labeling Program guidelines, common issues, and solutions for improving pesticide applications. Get insights on communication standards, product chemistry details, and conflict resolution methods provided by the EPA and USDA. Uncertainties in the review process are also addressed with recommended resources. Contact Chris Pfeifer at pfeifer.chris@epa.gov for further guidance.

hian
Download Presentation

EPA Organic Labeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Biopesticides Registration Improvement Course Chris Pfeifer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs BioPesticide and Pollution Prevention Division EPA Organic Labeling

  2. Overview for EPA’s Organic Labeling Program • EPA’s Organic Labeling Program’s primary purpose is to inform growers and users that a pesticide meets the criteria of USDA’s National Organic Program. • EPA’s program laid out in Pesticide Registration (PR) Notice 2003-1. • EPA’s organic labeling processed by a work group. EPA NOP claims provide the bona fides for USDA NOP certifiers.

  3. Resources for Organic Labeling • Online CFR for USDA (7 CFR Part 205):http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title07/7cfr205_main_02.tpl • Guidance for EPA’s Labeling Program (PR Notice 2003-1):http://www.epa.gov/PR_Notices/pr2003-1.pdf • USDA’s NOP website: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop

  4. Commonly Seen Problems / Issues • Incomplete submissions – applications to add organic claims should contain a manufacturing process and a complete compositional accounting. • Insufficient vetting of inputs – EPA reassessed ingredients, unaccounted for inerts in MPs, non-compliant proprietary mixes, ingredient specification sheets that don’t add up to 100%. • Use sites not taken into consideration. • Submitting an OMRI claim without requisite information.

  5. Solutions for Improving Applications • EPA Must Better Communicate Standards for Review • Applicants Must Make the Case • Product Chemistry: Provide EPA and USDA with details on all inputs. How are oils extracted? Are the ingredients naturally-occurring (i.e. are they biochemical or biochemical-like)? Are the minerals mined? Are natural ingredients synthetically produced? Does the broth or the reagent get consumed? • CSF Requirements: Provide all active CSFs, a statement voiding other CSFs, a complete list of suppliers, MSDS/spec sheets from each of those suppliers accounting for 100% of the composition. • Check National List Requirements:Have applicants cross-check application with USDA National List requirements. • Check PR Notice and LRM Requirements: Assure use sites and NOP language comport with PR Notice 2003-1 and the LRM. • Make Complete Case for OMRI Claims:An OMRI claim on a label is an EPA NOP claim and requires full review.

  6. Uncertainties • EPA NOP review of an input may involve policy decisions which are subject to exception. To resolve uncertainties: • Use the online resources available on USDA and EPA’s NOP websites. You will find copies of rules, policy letters, standards of review, contact info. etc… • There are many channels for resolving disagreement and misunderstanding regarding EPA NOP claims. EPA will consider unique circumstances. EPA decisions may be subject to USDA re-review. The NOSB provides ultimate recourse. • Call or write for guidance: Chris Pfeifer pfeifer.chris@epa.gov 703-308-0031

More Related