1 / 17

Constraints on the observation of mantle plumes using global seismology

Constraints on the observation of mantle plumes using global seismology. Arwen Deuss University of Cambridge, UK. Mantle plumes…?. * tomography: narrow plumes? super plumes? flattening at thermal boundary layers? density?

hide
Download Presentation

Constraints on the observation of mantle plumes using global seismology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Constraints on the observation of mantle plumes using global seismology Arwen Deuss University of Cambridge, UK

  2. Mantle plumes…? * tomography: narrow plumes? super plumes? flattening at thermal boundary layers? density? temperature, melting? * discontinuities: plumes in the transition zone? structure at the CMB? Seismologists study: velocity, anisotropy, attenuation

  3. Body wave data * sensitive to velocity * small scale structure * limited global coverage * tomography and discontinuities temperature and composition?

  4. Normal mode data Surface patterns Radial patterns * sensitive to velocity and density * large scale structure * good global coverage temperature and composition!

  5. Tomographic models * mostly: velocity models using P or S body waves plumes or not? resolution? which kernels to use? * few: velocity and density models using normal modes are plumes bouyant and hot? full model space search?

  6. Global tomography Shear wave velocity model S20RTS: * body waves * surface waves * normal mode splitting functions Ritsema, van Heijst & Woodhouse (1999)

  7. Tomography S20RTS S waves and modes Ritsema et al. 1999 * complex low shear wave velocity structure beneath Africa extending from CMB

  8. Tomography S20RTS * low velocity anomaly below Iceland is confined to the upper mantle BUT: are these hot and bouyant? Ritsema et al. 1999

  9. Tomography modes Density models Trampert et al. 2004 670-1200 km 1200-2000 km 2000-2891 km * super plumes are dense and compositional in origin …

  10. Data Data: 7018 traces * 6.0 < Mw < 7.0 * 100 < distance < 160 * depth < 75 km

  11. Robustness of reflections Stack for North America 220 410 520 660 800 1050 1150 (Deuss & Woodhouse, GRL, 2002)

  12. Transition zone discontinuities * discontinuities are caused by olivine phase changes thin transition zone in hotspot/plume regions

  13. Discontinuities Deuss et al. 2005 * using SS precursors, only large scale structure * thin transition zone, correlation with hotspots/plumes?

  14. Discontinuities Hotspots * hotspots with deep or CMB origin (Courtillot et al. 2003, Montelli et al. 2004) * only Afar, Ascension and Tristan have thinner TZ than average * Azores, Hawaii and Reunion have thicker TZ than average Deuss, 2005

  15. Discontinuities Mineral Physics BUT: * at high temperature, not olivine but garnet has the dominant phase transition at 660 km… (Weidner & Wang, 1998) (Hirose, 2002)

  16. Conclusions * global seismology is very useful in searching for mantle plumes * seismology only provides tomographic velocity models, and (?) large scale density models * mineral physics is very important for interpreting the results * at the moment, there is not enough evidence (yet) to interpret if mantle plumes are observed in seismology

  17. Multi-disciplinary approach …. van der Hilst, 2004

More Related