370 likes | 710 Views
Two Dimensional Hydraulic Fracture Simulations Using FRANC2D. Qingfeng Tan. Flow Index. 10. 1. 10. 100. 1000. 10000. k. /. k. frx. Vapor extraction well intersecting horizontal hydraulic fracture, from Bradner (2002). Importance of 2-D. Objective.
E N D
Two Dimensional Hydraulic Fracture Simulations Using FRANC2D Qingfeng Tan
Flow Index 10 1 10 100 1000 10000 k / k frx Vapor extraction well intersecting horizontal hydraulic fracture, from Bradner (2002)
Objective Develop and apply a model for predicting the forms of curving hydraulic fractures in two dimensions
Overview • Previous work • Vertical and horizontal fracture • Analytical models • Theoretical Analysis • Coupling mechanical and fluid flow analysis • Code Development • Automatic propagation (EXC_AUTO_DRIVER_FLOW) • Fracture form calculation routines • Fluid flow simulation routines • Application • Shallow soil model • Effects of layering and lateral residual compression
h X Q h Y Q a X Z a Y Z Q Z Q Z d d r r a a Hydraulic Fracture Design Vertical Fractures (a) (b) Horizontal Fractures (c) (d)
Previous Models Pressure time Length time Aperture time
Simulate Hydraulic Fracture • Fracture aperture—analyze as elastic displacements due to fluid pressure • Fluid pressure—analyze as flow in deforming fracture • Propagation—require stress intensity to equal critical value
Problem with Analysis in 2-D • Fracture curves-- numerical methods for stress analysis required • Fracture propagation-- analyze as a series of quasi static models. Requires many analyses to be conducted. Need FEM method with automatic regridding around fracture
FRANC2D • 2-D stress and displacement • Developed for structural fracture mechanics applications • Auto regrid around fracture • Fluid flow within fracture not included
Fracture with Fluid Flow-Coupled Approach • Modify FRANC2D to perform mechanical analysis, then calculate geometry of fracture, caused by fluid pressure, and other loadings • Fluid flow analysis adjust fluid pressure due to the shape changes of fracture, coupled with mechanical analysis • Propagation criterion: is decided by fracture geometry and fluid pressure
From 1-D implicit solution; flow bc at well, head bc at tip From FEM elasticity solution Flow and Deformation Coupling Pressure x Aperture x
Propagation • KI=Stress intensity factor • KI=KIc for propagation • KIC is material property, called fracture toughness.
How to ensure KI=KIc? Pressure Ptip x KI KIc Ptip
Code Development • Fracture propagation control routine -EXC_AUTO_DRIVER_FLOW • Fracture geometry calculation routines -EXC_LENGTH_FLOW -EXC_APER_FLOW -EXC_VOLU_FLOW • Fluid flow simulation routines -FLUID_FLOW_INIT -FLUID_FLOW_CALC
Automatic Propagation Subroutine • Fluid flow and mechanical analysis coupling to decide pressure and geometry • Propagation criterion: KI=KIC • Auto-remesh around fracture tip
Fracture Form Calculation • Length – EXC_LENGTH_FLOW • Aperture – EXC_APER_FLOW • Volume – EXC_VOLU_FLOW • Obtain Crack node info • Calculation in each segment, then integral
Fluid Flow and Aperture Subroutine • Calculate new heads using initial aperture • Calculate aperture using new head • Calculate heads using new aperture • Repeat and compare heads and apertures between successive iterations • Converge when change is less than tolerance, usually less than 7 iterations
Propagation Subroutine • Calculate KI for pressure at tip • Adjust pressure at tip slightly, redo fluid pressure calculations, and calculate new KI • Use two values of KI and pressure tip to interpolate new value of pressure tip that should give KI=KIc • Check KI and revise pressure tip as needed until KI is within tolerance of KIc
a VerificationUniform Pressure: Model Setting P • Infinite elastic media • Uniform pressure • Radial symmetric
Applications • Hydraulic fracture in shallow soil: • Gravity • Fluid injection • Soil with under-lying softer material • Soil with high lateral residual stress
Field Data Adoption Cross 4 Cross 3 • Four cross-section selection • Each cross-section starts from center of fracture to the edge of it, perpendicular with each other • Fracture path, uplift, and sand extent data are adopted 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 Cross 2 0.1 N Cross 1 0 5 10 15 feet
General case-Model Setting Depth 0 m -1.6 m -2 m frx -5 m 0 m 12 m Distance from well
Aperture and Uplift (m) Average radial extent of sand
Effects of Layering observed Richardson Simulated
Conclusions • FRANC2D has been modified to simulate hydro-mechanical coupling conditions during hydraulic fracturing. • A new simulation tool, HFRANC2D?, is available • The model has been verified using analytical solutions, error within a few percent
Conclusions, applications • Gentle bowl-like forms of hydraulic fractures in shallow soils can be predicted. • Effects of state of stress and material properties can be predicted and results resemble field observations.