710 likes | 2.57k Views
Infant Nutrition Assessment: GROWTH. Beth Ogata, MS, RD, CSP Joan Zerzan, MS, RD UW – CHDD bogata@uw.edu NUTR 526 – Fall 2012. Nutrition Screening and Assessment. Growth Data Used Throughout the Nutrition Care Process. Screening Assessment Diagnosis Monitoring and Evaluation.
E N D
Infant Nutrition Assessment: GROWTH Beth Ogata, MS, RD, CSP Joan Zerzan, MS, RD UW – CHDD bogata@uw.edu NUTR 526 – Fall 2012
Growth Data Used Throughout the Nutrition Care Process • Screening • Assessment • Diagnosis • Monitoring and Evaluation
NCP: Nutrition Screening • Definitions • Process of identifying characteristics known to be associated with nutrition problems (ASPEN, 1996) • Simplest level of nutritional care (level 1) (Baer et al, 1997) • Purpose • Identify individuals who appear to have or be at risk for nutrition problems • Identify individuals who require further assessment or intervention
Examples of Screening Risk Factors Anthropometrics: weight, length/height, BMI • measures < 5th%ile • measures >95th%ile • alterations in growth patterns • change in Z-scores • change 1-2 SD • change percentile channels Medical Conditions Medications Improper or inappropriate food/formula choices or preparation Psychosocial Laboratory Values
NCP: Nutrition Assessment • Obtain, verify, interpret information • Data used might vary according to setting, individual case, etc… • Questions to ask • Is there a problem? • Define the problem? • Is more information needed?
Tools Used in Nutrition Assessment • Growth • Measurements • Growth charts • Absolute size (percentile) • Pattern • Body composition (water, bone, muscle, fat) • Intake • Food record/recall analysis • Additional information • Medical • Development • Social • Laboratory • Etc.
NCP: Nutrition Diagnosis • Identification or labeling of problem that is within RD scope of practice to treat • Examples: • Inadequate intake • Inadequate growth
NCP: Intervention, Monitoring and Evaluation • Intervention • Etiology drives the intervention • Monitoring and Evaluation
Growth • Dynamic process • Increase in the physical size of the body as a whole or any of its parts associated with increase in cell number and/or cell size • Reflects changes in absolute size, mass, body composition • A normal, healthy child grows at a genetically predetermined rate that can be compromised by imbalanced nutrient intake
Growth in the first 12 months • From birth to 1 year of age, normal human infants triple their weight and increase their length by 50%. • Growth in the first 4 months of life is the fastest of the whole lifespan - birthweight usually doubles by 4 months • 4-8 months is a time of transition to slower growth • By 8 months growth patterns more like those of 2 year old than those of newborn.
Rates of weight gain: Breastfed vs. Formula-fed • Rates of gain for breastfed and formula fed infants during early months of life generally have been found to be similar although some reports have demonstrated greater gains by breastfed infants and others have shown greater gains by formula fed infants • Dewey, Pediatrics, 1992;89:1035 • Nelson, Early Human Development, 1989;19:223. • Cole, Acta Paediatr, 2002;91:1296.
Do parents understand growth charts? • Ben-Joseph E, et al. Do parents understand growth charts? A national, internet-based study. Pediatrics. 2009; 124(4):1100-09. • n=1000 parents (US) • Completed internet survey about awareness of, knowledge of, and attitudes toward growth monitoring and ability to interpret growth data • Survey at: http://kidshealth.org/misc/surveys/GrowthChartSurvey.pdf
Chart 1 • Based on this point, how old is the child? • How much does he weigh? • What “percentile” is this child’s weight at?
Chart 1 - continued • What does it mean that the child’s weight is at the 90th percentile? • 90% of children are heavier • Child is heavier than 90% of others • Child is 90% of recommended weight • I am not sure • Other
Reference vs Standard • Reference: a set of data used for normalizing measurements so that they can be manipulated statistically, grouped and compared with other sets of measurements. In principle, implies no value judgment and tells us nothing about optimal or satisfactory growth • Standard: Implies a value judgment. In theory, standards are selected based on representing “optimal,” “normal,” or “goal”
Fetal/Neonatal Growth Charts • Intrauterine charts • Classification of newborn • AGA • LGA • SGA • Postnatal Charts
Intrauterine/Fetal Growth Standards • Lubchenco • Gairdner • Babson/Benda • Fenton • Olsen
Fenton Chart • Data Sets: • Kramer, et al: 676,605 infants, 22-43 weeks • Nicholson, et al: 376,000 Swedish infants 28-40 weeks • Breeby, et al: OFC (N=29,090) and Length (N=26,973), 22-40 weeks • CDC Data • Time period 1963-2001
Postnatal Growth Charts • Accounts for initial weight loss • Dancis: Data 1948, very small sample size in lowest weight group • Ehrenkranz: Pediatrics 1999:104:280 • N=1660 • 14-16 g/kg/d weight gain • 0.9 cm/week increase length • 0.35 cm/week increase OFC
Infant Growth Charts (References): Timeline • Stuart/Meredith Growth Charts (1946-76) • Caucasian, Boston/Iowa city, small sample size • NCHS growth charts (1976-1978) • Cross sectional Data from NHES, NHANES, and FELs • CDC produced normalized version • 1978 WHO recommended international use • CDC (2000) • 5 cross sectional nationally representative surveys between 1963-1995 • Included more breast fed infants • WHO (2006) • Data from Brazil, Ghana, India, Norway, Oman and US • Multiethnic, affluent • Exclusive breastfeeding to 4 months • Solids according to recommendations 6 months • Continued breastfeeding to 12 months
Evolution: NCHS CDC Charts NCHS infant data: Fels study CDC infant data: NHANES I, II, III • Primarily formula-fed • Underrepresented groups: largely Caucasian, middle class • Intervals of measurements (q3 months from 3-36 months) may not define dynamic patterns during rapid growth phases • Statistical smoothing procedures • Standardized data collection methods • Expanded sample • More breastfed infants • Exclusions • VLBW infants • NHANES III weight data for >6 year olds
Evolution: NCHS WHO Charts • Released new growth standards April 2006 • Assumed infants and children grow similarly when needs are met. • Concerns for CDC charts included: • Frequency of growth measures during dynamic periods of infant growth
Compare the charts (<24 month olds) Source: MMWR, 2010; 59(No. RR-9):1-15.
Comparison of WHO and CDC Chart (weight-for-age) Girls Boys Source: MMWR, 2010; 59(No. RR-9):1-15.
Comparison of WHO and CDC Chart (stature-for-age) Girls Boys Source: MMWR, 2010; 59(No. RR-9):1-15.
Charts to Evaluate Growth of Infants CDC Clinical Charts http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/ WHO Child Growth Standards http://www.who.int/childgrowth/en • Sex-specific • Weight-for-age • Length-for-age • Weight-for-length • Head circumference-for-age • Choice between outer limits at 3rd and 97th percentiles, or 5th and 95th • Sex-specific • Weight-for-age • Length-for-age • Weight-for-length • Head circumference-for-age • On WHO site: BMI, other measures • Outer limits at 2nd and 98th percentiles
Differences between WHO and CDC infant charts • WHO mean > CDC mean birth to 6 months • “Healthy breastfed infants track weight-for-age along WHO but falter on CDC” • Cross at 6 months and WHO mean < 6 months • On the CDC chart, children appear heavier and shorter • On the WHO chart, children appear taller • WHO charts: • Higher estimate of overweight • Lower estimates of underweight, undernutrition
CDC Recommendations for infant growth charts Expert Panel (NIH, AAP) to review scientific evidence. Recommendations: • WHO charts from birth to 24 months • CDC charts for >24 months • As a screen, 2rd and 98th percentile on WHO corresponds to 5thand 95th on CDC • Clinicians should be aware that fewer individuals will be screened as “underweight” and more as “overweight” using WHO • For more, see http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts
Controversies/Issues • Screen vs. assessment • Standard vs. reference • Typical vs. ideal growth • Environmental influence • Variety of diets may result in acceptable growth and nutrition status • Normal population diversity • Plot individuals on both CDC and WHO. Does your assessment change? • Absolute size vs. pattern
PART 4: Problems with Growth Underweight Overweight Failure to Grow “Overfat”
Screening Assessment • Screening identifies nutritional risk and/or need for further assessment. Assessment: • Collect data • Interpret data • Link information • Compare to references, standards, expectations • Ask questions
Interpretation: Asking Questions • Is there a problem? • Was there a problem? • Does information make sense? • What are goals and expectations? • What is etiology of the problem?
Overweight • Weight in infancy associated with weight in childhood • Crossing percentiles (upward) in infancy is associated with ↑d OR of childhood obesity (Taveras, 2011) • Children in upper tertile had higher risk of childhood obesity than children in lower tertile (Andersen, 2012) • Appropriate screening tool, intervention not clear; Beth’s take-home message: keep feeding babies
Undernutrition • ↓ weight, no effect on length low weight-for-length • ↓ ↓ weight ↓ length or height eventually may appear proportionate
Failure to Grow, Failure to Thrive • Failure to gain weight or grow at expected rates • Weight-for-age <5th %ile • Weight-for-length <5th %ile • Decreased growth velocity (decrease over 2 SD over 3-6 months) • <80% ideal body weight • 1-5% tertiary hospital admissions for <1 year olds • Prevalence varies • 5-10% <3 years of age • Some populations at higher risk
Failure to Grow • Inadequate intake • Not enough food offered: Food insecurity, lack of knowledge of child’s needs • Not enough food consumed: Oral-motor dysfunction, behavioral feeding problems • Emesis • Malabsorption • Increased metabolic demand