340 likes | 474 Views
LIBRARY AND INFORMATION USE PATTERNS BY ENGINEERING FACULTY AND STUDENTS . Lisha Li William Baer June 2009. Outline. Purpose Methodology and process Survey Responses Survey Results Limitations Conclusions. Purpose. To study the library usage patterns by engineering faculty and students
E N D
LIBRARY AND INFORMATION USE PATTERNS BY ENGINEERING FACULTY AND STUDENTS Lisha Li William Baer June 2009
Outline • Purpose • Methodology and process • Survey Responses • Survey Results • Limitations • Conclusions
Purpose • To study the library usage patterns by engineering faculty and students • To compare usage patterns among different groups • Using the results of study to improve services in the following areas: • Library out-reach • Library instruction • Resources access
Methodology & Process • Online survey (CEE & ME) • Questionnaire with multiple choices and open end questions. • Focus on: library use and information resources use habits. • Number of questions: • Student survey: 17 • Faculty survey: 18 • Online tools used: Survey Monkey.
Methodology & Process • Questionnaire design – Oct. 2008 • IRB review – Oct. 2008 • Email survey link to departments (twice in 2 weeks) – Nov. 2008 • Data collection – Dec. 2008 • Faculty survey reopened – Feb. 2009 • Analysis – Dec. 2008- Feb. 2009
Survey Population and Response Rate • Student population: • Total enrollment (Fall 2008): 19,413 • Total enrollment in COE: 11,079 • Total students in ME & CEE: 3,398 • Total responses:274 • Response rate: 8%
Survey Population and Response Rate (cont.) • Faculty population: • CEE Faculty: 89 • ME Faculty: 97 • Total Faculty: 186 • Total Response: 25 • Response Rate: 13%
Demographics • Student Participants: • Undergraduates: 216 (79%) • Freshmen: 34 • Sophomore: 38 • Junior: 60 • Senior: 84 • Graduates: 58 (21%) • Masters: 13 • Doctoral: 45
Demographics (cont.) • Student Participants • By gender: • Female – 95 (35%) • Male – 178 (65%) • By school: • CEE – 90 (33%) • ME – 184 (67%) • International: 23 (8%) • Graduate: 18 • 31% of all graduate • Undergraduate: 5
Demographics (cont.) • Faculty Participants: • By Academic Level • Assistant Professor: 4 • Associate Professor: 7 • Professor: 12 • Other: 2 • Total: 25 • By Gender • Female: 2 • Male: 23
Google Effect (%) “Google is sufficient to meet most of my research needs.”
How Well the Undergraduates Feel They Know the Databases? How would you categorize your level of familiarity with using the following library resources? - (Undergraduate)
How Well the Graduates Feel They Know the Databases? How would you categorize your level of familiarity with using the following library resources? - (Graduate)
Limitations • Response rate • Timing of the survey • Interpretation of questions • Answer choices
Conclusions • Undergraduate students rely on the library as a space to study. • Over all, students prefer online tutorials for database training. But online tutorials can not replace other methods of instruction. • Seniors and graduate students have more knowledge about library resources compared to other students. But we still need to do more to promote library resources.
Conclusions (cont.) • Faculty rely on the electronic resources and interlibrary loan services for research. • We need to be more creative in promoting library resources and services.