1 / 4

A Criminal History Update

A Criminal History Update. May 10, 2013 Joanna Silver Staff Attorney joanna_silver@fd.org. Second Degree Assault in the District of Maryland. Categorically Not a COV Under 2L1.2’s “Use of Force” Clause – Blake; Motz

hilda
Download Presentation

A Criminal History Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Criminal History Update May 10, 2013 Joanna Silver Staff Attorney joanna_silver@fd.org

  2. Second Degree Assault in the District of Maryland • Categorically Not a COV Under 2L1.2’s “Use of Force” Clause – Blake; Motz • Categorically Not a COV Under the Career Offender GL (no mention of “otherwise” vs. “use of force” clauses) – Bredar; Motz, Bennett • Categorically Not a COV Under 2K2.1 (expressly considered under both “use of force,” and “otherwise” clauses) –Chasanow • Still Applying the Modified Categorical Approach – Hollander, Messitte • Postponing a Decision Pending Descamps – Titus • Issue Pending in a Habeas Petition –Garbis

  3. Pending Cases Re: Categorical vs. Modified Categorical Approach • Descamps – USC • Bailey; Barrillas; Royal – held in abeyance by the 4th Cir. pending Descamps • Cabrera-Umanzor; Aparicio-Soria; Lemus-Diaz; Rosas-Rosas; Martin – pending in the 4th Cir. and anticipate no ruling until Descamps

  4. Good Published Cases Post-Gomez • Moncrieffe v. Holder, --SC--, 2013 WL1729220 (April 23, 2013) • United States v. Rangel-Castaneda, 709 F. 3d 373 (4th Cir. 2013) • But see, Mondragon v. Holder, 706 F.3d 535 (4th Cir. 2013)

More Related