E N D
1. Florida Association of Bilingual Education SupervisorsJune 2011 Joanne H. Urrutia
Office of English Language Acquisition
United States Department of Education
2. National EL Population Trends
3. All data from the National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data.
Map file courtesy of Wikimedia Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USA_Counties_with_FIPS_and_names.svg.
Map colors based on www.ColorBrewer.org, by Cynthia A. Brewer, Geography, Pennsylvania State University.
Maps created by Keira Ballantyne and Malachy O’Connell.All data from the National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data.
Map file courtesy of Wikimedia Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USA_Counties_with_FIPS_and_names.svg.
Map colors based on www.ColorBrewer.org, by Cynthia A. Brewer, Geography, Pennsylvania State University.
Maps created by Keira Ballantyne and Malachy O’Connell.
8. National Assessment of Educational Progress
9. 2009 NAEP Hispanic White achievement gap 9
10. States with largest Hispanic population compared to Nation at grade 8 reading in 2009 10
11. Florida NAEP Results for Reading
12. Organizational Structure Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE)
Student Achievement and School Accountability (SASA)
Title III Formula Grants
Florida contact: Millie Bentley-Memon Office of English Language Acquisition (OELA)
Special Initiatives Division (SID)
Title III Competitive Grants:
FLAP
NPD
NAAN
Foreign Language Assistance Program
National Professional Development Program
Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Resources Foreign Language Assistance Program
National Professional Development Program
Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Resources
13. OELA’s SID Outreach Research
National Conversations
Dallas-Chicago
LA-Seattle
NYC-Charlotte
EL/SWD Forum
EL/STEM Forum Review and provide input on: evaluations/research reports, policies, technical assistance, and high priority programs
Collaborate with offices within ED: OESE, OII, OSEP, OCR, OPEPD, etc.
External Internal
14. National Reform Initiatives Race to the Top (RTT)
First round?2 states
Second round ? 14 states (FL)
RTT Assessments
Invest in Innovation (i3)
Scale-up grants
Validation grants
Development grants
15. Race to the Top Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in the global economy;
Building data systems that measure student growth and success, and inform teachers and principals about how they can improve instruction;
Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most; and
Turning around our lowest-achieving schools.
16. Standards and Assessments 44 States have adopted the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
RTT Assessment
$350 million for development of assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (Florida) and
SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium
Required to include ELs from the very beginning, rather than making accommodations later
17. Race to the Top RTT Enhanced Assessment Grant (EAG)
$10.7 million to develop English language proficiency assessments that are aligned to the CCSS
Pending work:
Development of common English language development standards
Alignment of ELP standards and CCSS
18. New Competitions RTT Early Learning Challenge
increase the number and percentage of low-income and disadvantaged children ages birth to 3 who are enrolled in high-quality early learning programs
design and implement an integrated system of high-quality early learning programs and services
ensure that any use of assessments conforms with the recommendations of the National Research Council's reports on early childhood
19. New Competitions Promise Neighborhood
eligible entities, including (1) nonprofit organizations, which may include faith-based nonprofit organizations, (2) institutions of higher education, and (3) Indian tribes.
Identifying and increasing the capacity of eligible entities that are focused on achieving results for children and youth throughout an entire neighborhood
Building a complete continuum of cradle-to-career solutions of both educational programs and family and community supports, with great schools at the center
Integrating programs effectively and efficiently across agencies
20. Research and Evaluation Title III Evaluation – Standards Report
Title III NPD Evaluation
Study of EL/SWD (RTI)
LIEP Lessons from Research and Promising Programs
Impact of RTT on ELs
PPSS – Policy and Program Study Services
IES – Institute for Education Science
NAS – National Academy of Science
NRC - National Research CouncilPPSS – Policy and Program Study Services
IES – Institute for Education Science
NAS – National Academy of Science
NRC - National Research Council
21. Office of Civil Rights During FY 09/10, OCR launched a total of 37 compliance reviews to enforce our civil rights laws—9 of which focused specifically on ELLs and/or LEP parent communication.
In FY 10/11, OCR has launched thus far a total of 9 compliance reviews that directly involve ELLs.
OCR has also redoubled its efforts with the effort of its 12 regional offices and headquarters to ensure that parents and students are made aware of their civil rights.
22. Reauthorization of ESEA NCLB is in need of reform
ED is working closely with Congress, because we believe it’s the best way to create comprehensive solutions
Intent was to pass a bill by the beginning of the school year
ED is investigating how to provide regulatory flexibility in exchange for commitments to reform
23. NCLB Regulatory Flexibility Ask states to prepare a comprehensive approach to:
Raise standards
Support the teaching profession
Implement fair, flexible and focused accountability
Continue to measure the achievement of all subgroups
Supporting the hard work the states and districts are doing to reform schools.
24. Budget Try to sustain momentum for programs that have unleashed an avalanche of K-12 reform activity over the past two years and make critical investments in early learning. It also will maintain funding for important formula programs.
Title III FY 2011
Had requested additional $50 million
In final budget Title III was cut $15 million
Title III FY 2012 we are requesting level funding at $750 million
25. Message from Title III Formula Grants Office AMAOs
ELP Standards and Assessment
CELLA
Parents’ rights to refuse program
SEA authority to review and approve expenses
Activity is allowable and necessary to run the Title III program
Supplement versus supplant
26. Contact Information
Dr. Joanne H. Urrutia
Deputy Director
Office of English Language Acquisition
US Department of Education
joanne.urrutia@ed.gov
202-401-4300