640 likes | 874 Views
UOIT AND DC. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Phase One Analysis October 25, 2008. Agenda. Schedule Durham College Key Stakeholder Issues Instructional Space Analysis UOIT Key Stakeholder Issues Instructional Space Analysis Campus Analysis Campus Stakeholder Issues Design Principles
E N D
UOIT AND DC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Phase One Analysis October 25, 2008
Agenda • Schedule • Durham College • Key Stakeholder Issues • Instructional Space Analysis • UOIT • Key Stakeholder Issues • Instructional Space Analysis • Campus Analysis • Campus Stakeholder Issues • Design Principles • Campus Analysis • Campus Alternatives for Discussion
Campus • 5 min Simcoe Street Conlin Street
Durham College • Key Stakeholder Issues • Preliminary Space Needs
DC Key Stakeholder Issues • Enrollment Growth • Durham College projected to grow at 3% per year – 15% over 5 years • Greatest impediment to growth is lack of space • Academic Programs • Potential Hospitality and Tourism program • Increased training to address the skilled trades shortages • Durham Regional Police satellite station • New energy programs at Whitby campus (energy incubator) • Potential new Fine Arts/Media and Health Sciences programs • Major Facility Needs • Relocate shared service areas from A, B, C and D wings into a new 'one-stop shopping' student services building • Decommission portables and reclaim shared service areas in A, B, C and D wings with teaching and learning spaces • Cluster programs by school in the Willey building to reinforce school identity • Introduce new Hospitality and Tourism facility • Create a joint Health Sciences building in A4 with UOIT • Potential Media, Arts and Design Centre
DC Key Stakeholder Issues • Quality of Space and Student Life Environment • Enhance the quality of instructional space • Improve the quality and quantity of study spaces, including quiet study areas • Improve quality and quantity of office and conference spaces for full and part time faculty • Need for informal meeting spaces for faculty, staff and students to create a sense of community • Constrained dining facilities need to be addressed
Instructional Space Analysis • Purpose • Project current and future space needs for each institution • Methodology • Interviews with UOIT and DC stakeholders • Council of Educational Facility Planners International space planning guidelines • Initial analysis of instructional space with subsequent examination of all space types Assumptions • Weekly student contact hours (WSCH) generated from the Fall 2008 Course Schedules for UOIT and DC • Fall 2008 enrollment figures and instructional space inventory supplied by UOIT and DC • In the absence of registration data for Trent students, course enrollments were assumed to be 65 percent of room capacity • Full space inventory for DC currently being developed
Preliminary Space Needs • Durham College – Distribution of Classroom Student Contact Hours • Sections sizes of 26 – 50 students account for 73 percent of classroom instruction
Preliminary Space Needs • Durham College - Classroom Utilization • 78 • 78 • 74 • Target - 70 • 67 • 51
Preliminary Space Needs • Durham College - Classroom Occupancy • Target - 70 • 68 • 63 • 50 • 50 • 34
Preliminary Space Needs • Durham College – Laboratory Utilization • 'Other' includes unassigned DC laboratories (computer labs) and 2 UOIT labs • 55 • 50 • 45 • 38 • Target - 35
Preliminary Space Needs • Durham College – Laboratory Occupancy • 'Other' includes unassigned DC laboratories (computer labs) and 2 UOIT labs • 94 • 78 • 73 • Target - 70 • 70
Preliminary Space Needs Summary • Durham College Summary • The majority of classroom contact hours are generated in small to mid-sized rooms • Very high level of classroom utilization confirms little scheduling flexibility in existing classroom supply • Low levels of occupancy in large classrooms indicate additional capacity may be available if section sizes can be increased • Laboratory utilization and occupancy are well above target and suggest possible overuse of room
UOIT • Key Stakeholder Issues • Preliminary Space Needs
UOIT Key Stakeholder Issues • Research at UOIT • Insufficient research space • Goal to grow graduate enrollment with focus in sciences, engineering and energy • Opportunity for partnerships with industry: • Automotive • Energy • IT • Health • Potential to develop high tech research park on North Campus • Immediate plans for Cyber Crime Center, possibly on North Campus
UOIT Key Stakeholder Issues • Enrollment Growth • Expected growth in CJPS, Communications and Business undergraduate and graduate programs • Shortage of space is a constraint to growth • Academic Programs • Goal to deliver market-oriented programs to meet GTA higher education needs • Potential Health Sciences program with link to Queens • Business and IT as separate Faculties • Major Facility Priorities • Development of Downtown Campus with CJPS, Business and Communications programs • Decommission UL and U5 • Build A4 for Energy and Nuclear Science • Build A5 for Health Sciences • Additional office and classroom space • 'One-stop shopping' student services building
Preliminary Space Needs • UOIT – Distribution of Classroom Student Contact Hours • Section sizes of 26 to 50 students and 150+ students account for 50 % of classroom instruction
Preliminary Space Needs • UOIT - Classroom Utilization • 87 • 86 • 84 • 81 • 78 • Target - 70 • 71 • 68 • 68 • 60 • 55
Preliminary Space Needs • UOIT - Classroom Occupancy • Target - 70 • 58 • 54 • 58 • 52 • 51 • 48 • 53 • 50 • 44 • 38
Preliminary Space Needs • UOIT – Laboratory Utilization • 61 • Target - 35 • 29 • 28 • 26 • 10 • 10 • 8 • 3 • 2 • 1
Preliminary Space Needs • UOIT Laboratory Occupancy • 80 • Target - 70 • 63 • 55 • 51 • 43
Preliminary Space Needs Summary • UOIT • High levels of classroom utilization in both the daytime and evening • Mismatch between classroom and section sizes accounts for low levels of occupancy • Low levels of occupancy suggest opportunities to better align classes with room sizes • Potential to accommodate enrollment growth in labs given low levels of utilization and occupancy
Shared Campus • Campus Stakeholder Issues • Design Principles • Campus Analysis
Campus-wide Stakeholder Issues • Housing and Student Life • Demand for student housing on or near the campus • Need to enhance on-campus student life opportunities • Existing student centre inadequate • Town-Gown • Students living in adjacent neighborhoods an issue • Institutions as economic generators: • Downtown campus • Research park • Workforce training • Institutional Relationships • Continue to build on opportunities inherent in shared campus • Desire for individual institutional identity within shared campus • Movement towards greater independent functions in some areas, e.g. Advancement
Campus Stakeholder Issues • Identified Shared Facility Priorities • Expand study spaces in library (learning commons) and throughout campus • Event space – auditorium, meeting rooms for career fairs, etc. • Student life spaces – group study, lounge, clubs, social spaces and student center • 'One-stop' student services building: • Housing office • Writing center • ESL department • 1st year experience drop in center • Center for Students with Disabilities • Career resource center • IT front-counter services • Bookstore • Cafeteria • Other (e.g. registrar, bursar, financial aid, academic advising)?
Design Principles • Design the campus to support the mission of each institution • Strengthen the identity of each institution by: • Defining their entry and arrival sequences • Creating an identifiable heart • Developing a strong sense of orientation for each institution • Improve the physical organization and legibility of the campus • Locate student life and shared spaces at the campus core to promote a vibrant social learning environment • Build a compact academic core to support a collegiate setting and walkable environment • Design buildings and outdoor spaces sustainably and in response to the natural and cultural landscape • Rationalize circulation with smooth transitions from car to parking to pedestrian • Enhance the surrounding urban setting through development
Campus Analysis • Learning Environment • Multi-Institutional Campus • Sense of Place • Climate • Connections • Capacity for Growth
5 min Learning Environment • Distribution of formal learning spaces on campus. Based on predominate building use
5 min Learning Environment • Distribution of informal learning/social places through out the campus in the public realm
Multi-Institutional Campus • Distribution of institutions, shared buildings, and shared learning/social places
Multi-Institutional Campus • Arrival by car to the campus, shared entry ways
Multi-Institutional Campus • Arrival by bus, shared public transportation
Sense of Place • North Oshawa Cultural Landscape: Forested Land
Sense of Place • North Oshawa Cultural Landscape: Natural Open Space
Sense of Place • North Oshawa Cultural Landscape: Agricultural Land
Sense of Place • Campus Landscape: Lawn
Sense of Place • Campus Landscape: • Quads and Greens
Sense of Place • Campus Landscape: Plazas
Sense of Place • Campus Landscape: • Athletic Fields
Sense of Place • Campus Landscape: Buildings
Climate • Building arrangements create sunny and shady campus spaces • Morning 9:00 am • (March 20th /September 22nd)
Climate • Building arrangements create sunny and shady campus spaces • Afternoon 4:00 pm • (March 20th /September 22nd)
Connections • Land Use in Oshawa
Connections • Open Space Corridors
Connections • Travel Distances between Campuses • UOIT/DC Downtown • Car: 10 minutes • Bus: 20 minutes • UOIT/DC Whitby • Car: 20 minutes • Bus: 20 minutes
Connections • Local Bus Routes in Oshawa
Connections • GO Transportation connecting UOIT / DC with the GTA