1 / 8

We illustrate some of the other choices as variations compared to our central value:

We illustrate some of the other choices as variations compared to our central value:. α S (Mz) = 0.1156 → 0.1196 New H1 ‘optimized’ parametrization New ZEUS-JETS ‘optimized parametrization Old ‘in-between’ parametrization with ‘humpy’ gluon solution. OLD. NEW. HERA I PDFs. HERA I PDFs.

hisano
Download Presentation

We illustrate some of the other choices as variations compared to our central value:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. We illustrate some of the other choices as variations compared to our central value: • αS(Mz) = 0.1156 → 0.1196 • New H1 ‘optimized’ parametrization • New ZEUS-JETS ‘optimized parametrization • Old ‘in-between’ parametrization with ‘humpy’ gluon solution

  2. OLD NEW HERA I PDFs HERA I PDFs Preliminary status requested Comparison of central fit plus total uncertainties to variations with αs(Mz)=0.1156 OLD/NEW are the same apart from high-x for the sea. STOP PRESS: the new NEW with fc=0.15 non-dynamic but Q20 and mc variation of fc, looks EXACTLy like OLD

  3. OLD NEW Comparison of central fit plus total uncertainties to variations with αs(Mz)=0.1196 OLD/NEW are the same apart from high-x for the sea STOP PRESS: the new NEW with fc=0.15 non-dynamic but Q20 and mc variation of fc, looks EXACTLy like OLD

  4. OLD NEW HERA I PDFs HERA I PDFs Preliminary status requested Comparison of central fit plus total uncertainties to parametrization variation using: New H1 optimised parametrization Old/new are the same

  5. OLD NEW Comparison of central fit plus total uncertainties to parametrization variation using: New H1 optimised parametrization OLD/NEW very slightly different at high-x Dbar STOP PRESS: the new NEW with fc=0.15 non-dynamic but Q20 and mc variation of fc, looks EXACTLy like OLD

  6. OLD NEW HERA I PDFs HERA I PDFs Preliminary status requested Comparison of central fit plus total uncertainties to parametrization variation using: New ZEUS-JETS optimised parametrization OLD/NEW look the same

  7. OLD NEW Comparison of central fit plus total uncertainties to parametrization variation using: New ZEUS-JETS optimised parametrization OLD/NEW look the same apart from very high-x Dbar STOP PRESS: the new NEW with fc=0.15 non-dynamic but Q20 and mc variation of fc, looks EXACTLy like OLD

  8. OLD NEW Preliminary status requested Comparison of central fit plus total uncertainties to parametrization variation using: the ‘humpy’solution for the h1/zeus parametrization. At Q2=4 (right)GeV2 where the humpy structure is more visible OLD/NEW look the same

More Related