1 / 4

Frequent Route Based Continuous Moving Object Location- and Density Prediction on Road Networks

Frequent Route Based Continuous Moving Object Location- and Density Prediction on Road Networks. Gyözö Gidofalvi Manohar Kaul Christian Borgelt Torben B. Pedersen. KTH – Royal Institute of Technology Uppsala University European Centre for Soft Computing Aalborg University.

hollis
Download Presentation

Frequent Route Based Continuous Moving Object Location- and Density Prediction on Road Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Frequent Route Based Continuous Moving ObjectLocation- and Density Prediction on Road Networks GyözöGidofalvi ManoharKaul Christian Borgelt Torben B. Pedersen KTH – Royal Institute of Technology Uppsala University European Centre for Soft Computing Aalborg University

  2. Problem Statement and Preliminaries • Aim: Given the current and historical movements ofvehicles, predicttheirnear-futurelocation on the road networkto: • Estimatenear-futuretrafficconditions: (density / speed / flow) • Provide actionable travel information based on future estimates • Inform the relevant vehicles in case of an (actual / predicted) event • Suggest how and which vehicles to re-route in case of an event • (o1,1122,2,2) • (o1,2223,2,4) • (o1,2333,2,6) • Continuousmovement on a road network (RN) • Mapmatchingclients: • GPS networklocation trajectorypiece (oid, segment, traversaltime, [arrivaltime]) • RN trajectory = sequenceoftrajectorypieces • Triptrajectories • Streamofevolvingtriptrajectories • ClosedContiguousFrequent Routes (CCFR): • Closed losslesscompressionofknowledge • Contiguous= ”no gaps”  effectiveprediction Locationprediction: What is the probabilityofo1being on segment 3444 in 2 timeunits? Densityprediction: Howmanyobjectswill be on segment 3242 in 2 timeunits? ? Predictiontime t Mining window ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2011, Chicago, Illinois, USA

  3. CCFR-Based Prediction • Mine and store CCFRscontinuously. • Depth-firstsearch • Closedness: direct check ofpattern extension • Alsocalculateturnstatistics • Retrieve and insert previously mined, relevant CCFRs in an FP-tree τ. • Given an object’scurrenttrajectoryqv: • Find the branchesthat ”best” match qv in τ. (NOTE: Turnstatisticsguarantee a match) • Calculate the probabilityofeachpossiblenext segment from the closedpattern supports. • Distribute the theprobability mass of the object proportional to the segment probabilities, extendqv, and recurseuntil the timehorizon is reached. • Aggregate the predictedobjectlocations at the timehorizon predictednetworkdensity. • Steps implemented as continuousqueries in a DSMS ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2011, Chicago, Illinois, USA

  4. Experiments and Results • Hardware: MacbookPro, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz CPU, 4MB L2 Cache, 800 MHz Bus speed, and 4GB memory • Data set: real-worldtrajectoriesof 1500 taxis and 400 trucks in Stockholm • Road network: 6000 directed, 55 meter long segments with a connectivity of degree of 2.3 • 17000 triptrajectoriesduring the courseof a day • Three groupsof experiments: • Throughput and execution time of CCFR steam mining: • Even for large mining windows and very low support values the execution time is within real-time processing limits. • Scalability of the CCFR mining: • Mined approximately 25K CCFRs from 17K input trajectories at a minimum support of 0.1% in approximately 40 seconds. Scales nearly linear with the number of trajectories. • CCFR-based prediction accuracy: • Outperforms the “turn statistics only" approach and its additional utility becomes increasingly pronounced as the time horizon is increased. ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2011, Chicago, Illinois, USA

More Related