1 / 25

Q6 quench test

Q6 quench test. Events analysis. Channel assignment. L TOT = 36 mH L MQM = 15 mH L MQML = 21 mH. B2. B1. MQM. MQML. Current cycles. Experiments with the beam finished by quenching the magnet (B2 aperture). Current cycles. Training quench on B1 aperture. Current cycles.

holly-duffy
Download Presentation

Q6 quench test

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Q6 quench test Events analysis

  2. Channel assignment LTOT = 36 mH LMQM = 15 mH LMQML = 21 mH B2 B1 MQM MQML

  3. Current cycles Experiments with the beam finished by quenching the magnet (B2 aperture).

  4. Current cycles Training quench on B1 aperture

  5. Current cycles Heater induced quench

  6. Quenchino (?) vs. quench PC reaction to decreased current? FPA – PC is switching ON the crowbar Resistive zone appearing in the coil Quench heater firing

  7. Beam induced quench vs. training quench Resistive zone appears earlier and develops faster for the training quench (more current in the magnet) Different aperture initiates the quench

  8. Beam induced quench vs. training quench Differential signal – visible jump resulting from a size difference between apertures Resistive zone starts to develop The quenching aperture is ramping up -> offset in voltage across each coil

  9. Heater induced quench added No inductive and no resistive voltage before the heat from the heaters arrives to the coil As the current is the same for the beam and heater induced quench – the propagation of the normal zone occurs at the same time and develops with the same speed. For the training quench it goes faster.

  10. All signals together…

  11. Longer time scale

  12. Training quench alone

  13. Heater induced quench alone

  14. First event before the training quench

  15. Second event before the training quench This event occurred about 200 ms before the magnet quenched. Nothing special is visible on the current readout in TIMBER.

  16. Quenchino ???

  17. Injection (178 A)

  18. Injection (178 A)

  19. Injection (178 A)

  20. 1000 A

  21. 1500 A

  22. 2000 A This event can be seen in PM files.

  23. 2500 A, quench

  24. PC can really see decreased current

  25. Conclusions • Lost particles really interact with the coil and an electrical signal is visible across it. • Mechanisms that that drive the current change and the voltage spike are not yet explained. • The two effects might have different causes. • After the heater firing all seems to be clear.

More Related