580 likes | 840 Views
The Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research (PCER) Program. The 2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference February 8, 2005 Caroline Ebanks James Griffin Institute of Education Sciences.
E N D
The Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research (PCER) Program The 2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference February 8, 2005 Caroline Ebanks James Griffin Institute of Education Sciences
AcknowledgementsPCER 2002 and 2003 ResearchersRTI PCER 2002 National Evaluation CoordinatorIna Wallaceand Holly RhodesMathematica Policy Research PCER 2003 National Evaluation CoordinatorJohn Love
IES Statutory Mission • Condition and progress of education in the United States • Education practices that improve academic achievement & access to education opportunities • The effectiveness of Federal and other education programs
Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research • Immediate Program Goals • Provide practitioners with evidence for selecting preschool curricula • Support rigorous evaluations of preschool curricula using random assignment • Additional Goals • Support complementary research studies to supplement the evaluation • Build capacity for collaboration between researchers and practitioners
PCER: General Framework • Three year longitudinal studies across the transition from preschool to kindergarten and first grade • Grantees were funded to implement curricula and conduct complementary research studies at each project site • Focus on supporting school readiness, especially for disadvantaged children • Common core of evaluation data collected by an outside contractor
Basic Design of Evaluation • Two groups of grantees (PCER 2002 and PCER 2003) implementing a variety of preschool curricula • Randomly assigned either schools, classrooms, or children to the treatment condition • Baseline and three follow-up assessments—end of preschool, end of kindergarten, and end of first grade
Primary Research Questions • What outcomes do specific curricula produce? • Are outcomes sustained over time?
Secondary Research Questions • What is the relationship between level of implementation and participation and curriculum effectiveness? • How are experiences in kindergarten and first grade related to child outcomes?
PCER Project Cohorts IES Cohort 2: PCER 2003 Cohort 1: PCER 2002 National Evaluator: MPR National Evaluator: RTI 5 Grantees 7 Grantees
Basic Design Features • 14 Experimental Curricula • 12 Grantees in 13 geographic locations -California -Florida -Georgia -Kansas -Missouri -New Hampshire -New Jersey • -New York • -North Carolina • Tennessee • Texas • Virginia • Wisconsin
PCER Curricula • PCER 2002 Curricula • Bright Beginnings (TN) • Creative Curriculum (NH, NC,GA, TN) • Doors to Discovery (TX) • Early Literacy and Learning Model (ELLM) (FL) • Ladders to Literacy (NH) • Let’s Begin with the Letter People (TX) • Pre-K Mathematics with DLM Express Math (CA/NY) • Project Approach (WI) • PCER 2003 Curricula • Curiosity Corner (FL, NJ, KS) • The Language Focused Curriculum (VA) • Literacy Express (FL-FSU) • Open Court with DLM Early Childhood (FL-FSU) • Project Construct (MO) • Ready, Set, Leap! (Newark, NJ)
Grantees’ Complementary Research • FSU (Chris Lonigan): Implementation of Open Court/DLM and Literacy Express • NC/GA (Richard Lambert): Implementation of Creative Curriculum, 4th edition • UNH (Jeff Priest): Implementation of Ladders to Literacy
Cross-Site Study Sample Size • Total sample size • 2913 children and 317 classrooms • PCER 2002: • 1,686 Children and 180 Classrooms • PCER 2003: • 1,227 Children and 137 Classrooms
Types of Measures in the Cross-Site Study • Child Assessments • Classroom Observations • Teacher interviews • Teacher reports of child behavior • Parent interviews
Overview • Preschool program type • Demographics • Academic Outcomes • Social Outcomes • Teacher Characteristics
Types of Preschool Programs in the PCER 2002 Cohort 6% 44% 50%
Types of Preschool Programs in the PCER 2003 Cohort 12% 23% 65%
Demographics From the Parent Interview
Academic Outcomes From the Child Assessment -Baseline Data-
Child Math Assessment (CMA)Composite score, by treatment status
Test of Early Reading Ability (TERA): Reading Quotient,by treatment status
Woodcock-Johnson-III: Letter Word Identification,by treatment status
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) III, by treatment status
Test of Language Development (TOLD): Grammatical Understanding
Social Outcomes From Teacher Report Form -Baseline Data-