1 / 39

Summarizing Students' Achievements and Abilities in Education

This chapter discusses indicators of achievement and abilities in education, including reliable and standardized assessments, raw scores, criterion-referenced scores, norm-referenced scores, and standard scores. It also explores effective grading practices, considering improvement and effort, extra credit, late and missing assignments, and the use of portfolios. Additionally, it examines standardized tests, including achievement tests, aptitude and intelligence tests, and school readiness tests. The use of technology in assessments and choosing and interpreting standardized tests is also discussed. Lastly, the chapter explores high-stakes testing and accountability in education.

Download Presentation

Summarizing Students' Achievements and Abilities in Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 15 Summarizing Students’ Achievements and Abilities

  2. Indicators of Achievement • Must be reliable • Must be standardized • Must be valid • Must be practical

  3. Summarizing the Results of a Single Assessment

  4. Raw Scores • Based solely on the number or point value of correctly answered items • easy to calculate • difficult to interpret • raw score = 6

  5. Criterion-Referenced Scores • Indicate what a student has achieved, relative to specific objectives or standards • either-or score (pass or fail) or level of competence

  6. Norm-Referenced Scores • Indicate how a student’s performance compares with average performance of peers • grade-equivalent scores • age-equivalent scores • percentile ranks • standard scores

  7. Standard Scores • How far a student’s performance is from the group mean • tend to reflect the normal distribution of scores Many Some None Number of People Low Moderate High Characteristics Being Measured

  8. Calculating Standard Scores

  9. Using Scores in the Classroom • Criterion-referenced scores most useful • Raw scores second-best choice • Norm-referenced scores occasionally appropriate

  10. Determining Final Class Grades

  11. For Effective Grading • Take the job seriously • Base grades on achievement • Base grades on hard data • Use many assessments, but don’t count everything • Identify and stick to reasonable grading system • Accompany grades with qualitative information

  12. Considering Improvement • Assign greater weight to assessments conducted at the end of semester • Give students opportunities to correct errors & demonstrate mastery • Consider offering retakes • Reinforce improvement in other ways

  13. Considering Effort • Most experts recommend againstbasing grades on effort. • more skilled and knowledgeable students don’t need to exert much effort • effort can only be assessed subjectively

  14. Extra Credit • Appropriate if: • available to all students • related to instructional goals and objectives

  15. Late and Missing Assignments • Explain why punctuality is important. • Solicit students’ input about reasonable deadlines. • Give students guidance/support to complete assignments on time. • Record “Incomplete” and describe work that must be done to pass. • If possible, base final grades on subset of summative assessment results.

  16. Using Portfolios

  17. Portfolios • Collection of student’s work • compiled systematically over time • paper-pencil assignments & other artifacts • may include student reflection, self-evaluation • Types of portfolio • working • developmental • course • best-work

  18. Constructing Student Portfolios • Planning • Collection • Selection • Reflection • Projection • Presentation

  19. Standardized Tests

  20. Achievement Tests • Assess how much students have learned of what they have been taught • enable comparisons across time/place • Reliability tends to be high • Content validity may be low

  21. Aptitude & Intelligence Tests • General scholastic aptitude tests • general capacity to learn (“intelligence”) • intended to predict future academic achievement • predictive reliability often low • Specific aptitude & ability tests • intended to predict future performance in a particular content domain • predictive reliability often even lower

  22. School Readiness Tests • Intended to assess cognitive skills important for success in a typical kindergarten or first-grade curriculum • helpful for looking for specific delays • scores correlate only moderately with later school achievement

  23. Using Technology • Adaptive testing is possible • Can assess skills & knowledge • animations, simulations, videos, recorded messages • Can assess problem-solving skills, strategies • Can assess abilities under varying levels of support • Allow on-the-spot objective scoring and analyses

  24. Choosing Standardized Tests • Choose a test with high validity for your needs • Choose a test with high reliability for students similar to yours • Make sure that the norm group is relevant to your population

  25. Using Standardized Tests • Take students’ age and development into account • Make sure students are adequately prepared • Administer according to directions and report any unusual circumstances

  26. Interpreting Standardized Test Scores • Have a clear, justifiable rationale for establishing cutoffs • Compare standardized test scores only when they are derived from the same or equivalent norm group(s) • Never use a single test score to make important decisions

  27. High-Stakes Testing and Accountability

  28. High-Stakes Tests • High stakes = single assessment used to make major decisions • Accountability = school personnel are mandated to accept responsibility for students’ performance

  29. No Child Left Behind Act • Mandates high-stakes testing and accountability in all public schools • Mandates that all states establish challenging academic content standards • Requires “Adequately Yearly Progress” in meeting state-determined standards • Highly controversial with many states applying for and obtaining waivers to develop state-specific plans

  30. Problems with High-Stakes Testing • Tests may not reflect important instructional goals. • Teachers may teach to the tests. • Too much attention may be focused on a small group of students. • School personnel have disincentives to follow standardized testing procedures and to assess progress of low achievers. • Different criteria lead to different conclusions about student performance. • Too much emphasis is placed on punishing low-performing schools. • Students’ motivation affects performance, and consistently low performance affects motivation.

  31. Potential Solutions • Identify, assess important things • Advocate for a focus on individual student progress • Advocate for support for “failing” schools • Educate the public about what standardized tests can and cannot do • Look at alternatives to traditional tests • Advocate for the use of multiple measures in any high-stakes decisions

  32. Taking Student Diversity into Account

  33. Considering Diversity • Cultural bias • items can offend or unfairly penalize some students based on ethnicity, gender, SES. • not all students are familiar with group-administered standardized test procedures • stereotype threat can occur • Language differences • Students with special needs

  34. Confidentiality and Communication About Assessment Results

  35. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) • Limits normal school testing practices to assessment of achievement and scholastic aptitude • Restricts access to students’ assessment results to: • students who earn them • their parents • school personnel directly involved with students’ education and well-being

  36. Communicating Assessment Results • Make sure you understand the results yourself • Describe the test and students’ performance in broad, general terms • When reporting specific test scores, use percentile ranks and stanine

  37. The Big Picture

  38. The Big Picture • Considerable information is lost when performance is summarized as a single score. • Summative evaluations of achievement must have high content validity. • Most assessment instruments focus on cognitive factors affecting learning and achievement. • other factors may be equally influential

More Related