1 / 22

SORD Gateway Updates

SORD Gateway Updates. Stephanie Graffuis. Overview. Introduction Capabilities Enhancements and Fixes SORD Gateway Efforts Client Capabilities New Applications of the SGW. Introduction.

holt
Download Presentation

SORD Gateway Updates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SORD Gateway Updates Stephanie Graffuis

  2. Overview • Introduction • Capabilities • Enhancements and Fixes • SORD Gateway Efforts • Client Capabilities • New Applications of the SGW

  3. Introduction • The SORD Gateway is a component in OneSAF that provides HTTP access to OneSAF’s distributed runtime simulation data. • Uses standard mechanisms for data distribution • HTTP for database queries • XML used to encode objects • REST principles with HTTP request verbs • Provides a non-simulation specific API that improves scalability • Objects and interactions in the SORD are resources for clients to act on via the SORD Gateway

  4. Simulation Needs • Simulation community needs addressed by the SORD Gateway: • Reusable components • Enhanced methods of interoperability • Solutions for complex, larger training problems • Rapid prototype results • Support multiple communication protocols, fidelities, and configurations

  5. Capabilities • The core capabilities of the SORD Gateway are • Getting, deleting, creating, and updating objects • Subscribing to object and interaction events • Creating and firing interactions • Defining new object and interaction types

  6. Enhancements - Dynamic Requests • Requests provided by SGW are its resources • SORD has different resources (objects, interactions) • Requests extension framework • uses OneSAF composability concepts • Allows now we can add specific capabilities without cluttering core functionality • Advantages • Keep SGW generic and simulation independent • Minimize OneSAF dependencies and changes

  7. Enhancements - Online Help • Help is provided online while SORD Gateway is running • Web browser accessible • Content is accumulated from all available SGW request resources • Manually exported for offline viewing in our documentation folders

  8. Enhancements - Other • JUnit tests • Multi-client notification/subscription support • Performance • Tests written • HTTP Compression

  9. SORD Gateway Efforts Each project demonstrates a new requirement for interoperability to satisfy a complex training requirement. Several projects within the RDECOM-STTC use the SORD Gateway for their research efforts.

  10. SORD Gateway Efforts • Game Based C2 • SGW used to inject externally calculated physics effects into OneSAF • ARA SGW Client and RPEL • Rubble • SGW used to create rubble piles based on external calculations for flyout debris • Anyar, Inc. physics motion solver • ARA SGW Client and RPEL

  11. SORD Gateway Efforts • HI2NT • SGW used to assist in transferring combat intelligence information into OneSAF • ARA SGW Client • MATREX ProtoCore API

  12. Client Capabilities • These are documented efforts on how the SORD Gateway was used to accomplish certain goals. They may or may not require code changes. • How-to information written up • Minimal to no code changes needed • Proof-of-concept tests

  13. Client Capabilities • Ownship • Client goal: override entity location (mobility) and damage state (vulnerability) • Documented how to use existing framework within OneSAF • Mood/Gesture • Communicate mood/gesture from JNEM to OneSAF • OneSAF RDM modified to store values per entity

  14. Client Capabilities • Creating Rubble • Inject rubble piles into OneSAF during scenario run based on external physics calculations • Proof-of-concept test uses existing OneSAF dynamic terrain with minor workarounds • Scenario Management • Change simulation state via the SORD Gateway • JUnit test and SORD Gateway dynamic request created

  15. New Applications of the SORD Gateway • In what interesting ways can we enhance the SGW or use existing enhancements to further promote interoperability to solve complex use cases? • Graphical User Interfaces • Object Wrappers

  16. Graphical User Interfaces • The SORD Gateway publishes available client requests via URL. • Content is available as HTML or XML • Publication is dynamic based on runtime settings • Originally started as a means of capability testing

  17. Graphical User Interfaces • When available requests are retrieved as HTML content ... • A web form is provided for user interaction • viewable within an internet browser • requests can be made via ‘point and click’ • Allows for independent user interfaces via web enabled desktop applications

  18. Graphical User Interfaces • When available requests are retrieved as XML content ... • Same scalability, more powerful • Not limited to Gateway’s HTML rendering • Clients can render content into HTML or other GUIs to create custom applications

  19. Object Wrappers • The SORD Gateway allows you define new data types at runtime for information storage and distribution. • Data changes only remain while running after being defined • minimal effort to setup and/or change • no hard coded changes required

  20. Object Wrappers WRAPPER myVehicle vin make model GROUND_VEHICLE name location velocity entityType ... • Extend OneSAF data for data tracking and linking in federate/client • Wrap existing OneSAF objects to add metadata about that object that is not represented

  21. Object Wrappers WRAPPER-ENTITY trueSelf objectType size appearance LIFEFORM name location velocity entityType ... • Disguise OneSAF data for different visual representation within federate/client • Wrap existing OneSAF objects to represent them differently than they really are

  22. Questions? Email info@stackframe.com

More Related