1 / 14

Patient and Public Involvement in Commissioning

Patient and Public Involvement in Commissioning. Trish Turner Public Involvement Manager. Commissioning. New ‘whole systems’ process Need to involve the public 5 workshops Not perfect - but better than it was Continually evaluating and revising Sharing good practice (and our mistakes!).

honora
Download Presentation

Patient and Public Involvement in Commissioning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Patient and Public Involvement in Commissioning Trish Turner Public Involvement Manager

  2. Commissioning • New ‘whole systems’ process • Need to involve the public • 5 workshops • Not perfect - but better than it was • Continually evaluating and revising • Sharing good practice (and our mistakes!)

  3. 19.80% 18.20% 15.60% 15.00% 12.60% 11.80% 7.00% Criteria

  4. Proposal • Does this proposal involve patients, carers and the public in how their care is delivered? Details? • Does this proposal meet known public expectations and health wants? • Is there any evidence for patient experiences or satisfaction from this proposal? If so, describe.

  5. Flow Chart Proposal: • Discussed with relevant agencies/multi-disciplinary teams • Consulted with co-ordinator at PCT • Finance verified with organisation’s finance department

  6. Flow Chart (cont…) • Cost-data removed • benefits-only data submitted to each Clinical Modernisation Public 2 reps 2 reps 2 reps

  7. Flow Chart(cont…) Scoring Panel 1 x Chair 2 x Observers

  8. Flow Chart(cont…) Benefit scores Administrator combines with cost information and ranks in cost-value Recommendation to Board PCT Board makes purchasing decisions

  9. Age Concern Youth & Community Service Diverse Communities Forum Expert Patient Programme Carers Forum Learning disabilities Self-Advocacy WN Patient Partnership PPIF WN CVS UEA PCT Planning Group

  10. Citizen’s Jury 155,648 persons in WNPCT area • 50% male/50% female • 57% working age • 22% under 19 • 21% aged 65+ • 10% carers • 20% long-term health conditions • under 2% BME

  11. Citizen’s Jury

  12. Stages • Step 1 - ‘committee’ person making decisions as Panellist • Step 2 - shadow by ‘non-committee’ person • Step 3 - ‘non-committee’ person taking more decisions with support • Step 4 - ‘Panellist shadowed by another ‘non-committee’ person

  13. Issues • Training • Expenses • Advocacy/Support • Funding • Voluntary sector support

  14. More Information... • Further info:http://www.natpact.nhs.uk/cms/140.php • Contact: Trish Turner • Tel: 01553 816217 • email: trish.turner@westnorfolk-pct.nhs.uk

More Related