1 / 13

S yngas Production from Petroleum C oke G asification

Team Hotel: Russel Cabral, Tomi Damo , Ryan Kosak, Vijeta Patel, Lipi Vahanwala Advisors: Bill Keesom – Jacobs Consultancy Jeffery Perl, PhD – UIC Dept. Of Chemical Engineering March 8 , 2011. S yngas Production from Petroleum C oke G asification. Review from Presentation 2.

honorato-avery
Download Presentation

S yngas Production from Petroleum C oke G asification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Team Hotel: Russel Cabral, TomiDamo, Ryan Kosak, Vijeta Patel, LipiVahanwala Advisors: Bill Keesom – Jacobs Consultancy Jeffery Perl, PhD – UIC Dept. Of Chemical Engineering March 8, 2011 Syngas Production from Petroleum Coke Gasification

  2. Review from Presentation 2 • Discussed the Shell membrane gasifier • Discussed our syngas cleaning processes • Sulfur Removal • Claus Process • Water Gas Shift • Flow Sheets • Early Material and Energy Balances

  3. Today’s Objectives • Flow Sheeting • Energy Sinks/Loads • Equipment Sizing • Costing Aspen Process Estimator

  4. Questions Brought Up Last Time • What was the heat rate brought up in the gasifier comparisons? • Why use N2as a transport gas and not CO2? • How are we absorbing CO2? • What is a better definition of the quench? • Needed a better WGS block flow.

  5. Project Purpose • Producing syngas from petcoke to be used by Team Golf for production of acetic acid • 2730 tons/day of syngas • Desired CO to H2 ratio – 1:2.4 molar ratio • Desired C to H ratio – 1:4.4 molar ratio • Desired Temperature and Pressure • 460°F • 725 psia

  6. Flow Sheeting

  7. Energy Sinks / Loads

  8. Equipment Sizing

  9. Costing Aspen Process Estimator

  10. Report Outline • Final Report: • Executive Summary IP • Discussion IP • Recommendations N/A • Appendices • Design Basis: Done • Block Flow Diagram: IP • Process Flow Showing Major Equip.: IP

  11. Report Outline • Appendices (Continued) • Material and Energy Balances: IP • Calculations: IP • Annotated Equip. List: IP • Econ. Eval. Factored from Equip. Costs: IP • Utilities: IP • Conceptual Control Scheme: N/A • Major Equipment Layout: IP

  12. Report Outline • Appendices (Continued) • Distribution and End-use Issues: N/A • Constraints Review: IP • Applicable Standards: N/A • Project Communications File: IP • Information Sources and References: IP

  13. References

More Related