1 / 13

Historical background

hop
Download Presentation

Historical background

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Virage idéologique dans la gestion de l’aide canadienne publique au développement: tension et dynamique Ideological Changes in the Management of Canadian Foreign Aid: Tensions and Dynamics François AudetProfesseurÉcole des Sciences de la Gestion – ESG-UQAM&Directeur Observatoire canadien sur les crises et l’action humanitaireOCCAHetOlga Navarro-FloresProfesseurÉcole des Sciences de la Gestion – ESG-UQAM

  2. Historical background • A “shift” by/from the “NGO” Canadian aid community • Point de Mire, April 2011. “Les nouvelles tendances de l’humanitaire canadien”. François Audet • Audet François, Francis Paquette et Stéfanie Bergeron. (2013). «Religious nongovernmental organisations and Canadian international aid, 2001–2010: a preliminary study», Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, Vol.34, No.2, P.291-320 • François Audet et Olga Navarro-Flores. Virage dans la gestion de l’aide canadienne publique au développement: tensions et dynamiques d’une nouvelle idéologie. Dans David Morin et Stéphane Roussel (dir.), «Un monde finit, un autre commence? » La politique étrangère de Stephen Harper (2006-2013)», Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, numéro spécial, à paraître.

  3. Phase I: Religious nongovernmental organisations and Canadian international aid, 2001–2010: a preliminary study

  4. Phase II : What are the conditions in which occurred these changes and the decision making process of the conservative administration? • Sort governmental decisions and categorised them by the development management theoretical framework (Sadhvi & Cooke, 2008); • Public interest? • Self preservation? • Ideology? • Aid effectiveness? • Research objective: Allow a normative reflexion on Canadian aid based on a Public administration approach;

  5. Development management theoretical framework

  6. Discussion & conclusion • All conservative decisions can not be justified based on «program or policy effectiveness » or « projects quality », rather: • Self preservation behaviour & political interest • Conservative ideology • This behaviour imply a dogmatic and religious rigid decision making process: • Manichean logic « good » or « bad » • No nuance nor debate • Exclusion of all who do not share the same values and phagocyte the others;

  7. Discussion & conclusion • Significant political interventionism into the administration of aid programs • Tensions : ideological, political & administrative • The “Liberal bias” is now a “conservative bias” • New actors: religious groups & private sector • Positive of negative effect? • New consultative & collaborative window within the state agencies?

  8. Phase III & IV : Impact on this political interventionism on decision making and funding channel • Assess the evolution of funding channel –NGO- from 2010-2013; • Assess the evolution of funding channel – Projects, regions, private business vs NGO;

  9. Merci! Questions?

More Related