1 / 27

AERA April 16, 2012

CRPBIS: An Equity-oriented Systemic Change Model to Address Minority Disproportionality. Aydin Bal, PhD. University of Wisconsin- Madison. AERA April 16, 2012. Wisconsin CRPBIS Collaboration.

hosea
Download Presentation

AERA April 16, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CRPBIS: An Equity-oriented Systemic Change Model to Address Minority Disproportionality Aydin Bal, PhD. University of Wisconsin- Madison AERA April 16, 2012

  2. Wisconsin CRPBIS Collaboration

  3. CRPBIS Implementation: A of State-Wide Action of Developmental TransferThe ultimate goal of the CRPBIS framework is to facilitate positive, safe, supportive, inclusive, and democratic school cultures via ecologically fit, locally meaningful, sustainable, and socially just systemic transformation efforts.

  4. CRPBIS Collaboration • Research Partners: • UW-Madison & WCER • Elizabeth Kozleski – Arizona State University • Kathleen King Thorius – IUPUI-Indianapolis • Consultants • George Sugai-University of Connecticut • Alfredo Artiles - Arizona State University • Advisory Board • Gloria Ladson-Billings –University of Wisconsin-Madison, a student with EBD identification, a parent of student with disability, and a DPI representative • UW-Madison Research Team

  5. Disproportionality at the intersection of Race, Language, & Ability Unequal proportions of CLD students in high incidence disability categories (i.e., LD, mild- MR, E/BD, and speech-language impairments) & gifted and talented education programs (Donovan & Cross, 2002; Heller, Holtzman, & Messick, 1982; Johnson, 1969) Male low-income AA and NA students are the most affected groups at the national level (Donovan & Cross, 2002) Disproportionality: low expectation, stigma, racial segregation, negative outcomes in SPED (Heller, Holtzman, & Messick, 1982)

  6. Racialization of School Discipline • Racialization of discipline: Minority students are punished more severely for less serious more subjective reasons such as disrespect (Skiba et al., 2008) • Punitive and exclusionary discipline: Exclusion, academic failure, high-school dropout, and involvement in the juvenile delinquency system (Leone et al., 2003) • AA students:18 % of the student population - 46 %of those suspended and 39 % of all expulsions. • AA students with disabilities: 21 % of the total numbers of students w/ disabilities - 44 % of those w/ disabilities subject to mechanical restraints, like being strapped down (Office of Civil Rights, 2012).

  7. Spatio-temporal Context : Disproportionality by Race and Disability High Incidence Disabilities (ED+LD+MR) 2006-2007 Risk Ratio: African American vs. Whites http://nccrest.eddata.net/maps/index.php (Source: NCCRESt, 2011)

  8. Spatiotemporal Context of Disproportionality MADISON, WI http://nccrest.eddata.net/city7/index.php (Source: NCCRESt, 2007)

  9. District-wide Special Education Risk

  10. Relative Risk – African-American Students

  11. Relative Risk – Native-American Students

  12. Relative Risk – Hispanic Students

  13. School-wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS): Challenges and Possibilities

  14. (Reprinted from pbis.org)

  15. (Bal, 2011)

  16. Existing Cultural Responsiveness in PBIS: 1. Cultural Awareness 2. Disaggregated Date 3. Family Involvement (Bal, 2011)

  17. (Reprinted from Artiles, 2007)

  18. Historicity Agency Expansive Learning Contradictions Space Transformation

  19. (Cole & Engeström, 1996)

  20. (Bal, 2011)

  21. A Systemic Change Methodology:Local to Global Justice • A mixed research methodology of formative intervention (Engeström, 1987; 2008; 2011) • Re-mediating school cultures • Facilitating a equitable, sustainable, and locally meaningful systemic transformation via Learning Labs • Infusing culturally responsive research-based practices into 4 key tenets of culturally neutral PBIS

  22. CRSPBIS Implementation ProcessesInside-out & Outside-in • Forming CRPBIS Learning Labs • Determining Desired Outcomes of CRPBIS • Understanding Cultural Mediation and Implementing Culturally Responsive Practices • Using Data for Continuous Improvement and Innovation • Ongoing Systemic transformation

  23. CRPBIS Learning Labs • Before a major systemic transformation • All stakeholders • 5-10 consecutive sessions & monthly follow sessions • Primary stimulus: Daily problems and disruptions • Secondary Stimulus: CHAT theory, map rich data representation, new assessment and data analysis instruments, evidence-based culturally responsive practices, video recordings of lab sessions… • New solutions are developed and tested locally • Formation of a new shared tools, rules, and divisions of labor

  24. (Engeström, 2010) (Engeström, 2010)

  25. Spatiotemporal Patterns & Predictors of Disproportionality in Wisconsin • Primary Research Questions: • To what extent are CLD students represented in EBD category and suspension/expulsions? • To what extent is individual risk predicted by individual and/or district sociodemographic factors? • Wisconsin state level data from 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2010-2011 • Hierarchical linear modeling (hlm)

  26. Disproportionality

  27. CRPBIS: An Equity-oriented Systemic Change Model to Address Minority Disproportionality Aydin Bal, PhD. University of Wisconsin- Madison AERA April 16, 2012

More Related