1 / 45

Light Hadron Spectrum and Pseudoscalar Decay Constants with 2+1f DWF at L s = 8

Light Hadron Spectrum and Pseudoscalar Decay Constants with 2+1f DWF at L s = 8. D.J. Antonio, K.C. Bowler, P.A. Boyle, M.A. Clark, B. Joo, A.D. Kennedy, R.D. Kenway, R.J. Tweedie, A. Yamaguchi. Robert Tweedie RBC-UKQCD Collaboration. Contents. Actions Datasets from QCDOC Residual mass

hoshi
Download Presentation

Light Hadron Spectrum and Pseudoscalar Decay Constants with 2+1f DWF at L s = 8

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Light Hadron Spectrum and Pseudoscalar Decay Constants with 2+1f DWF at Ls = 8 D.J. Antonio, K.C. Bowler, P.A. Boyle, M.A. Clark, B. Joo, A.D. Kennedy, R.D. Kenway, R.J. Tweedie, A. Yamaguchi Robert Tweedie RBC-UKQCD Collaboration UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  2. Contents • Actions • Datasets from QCDOC • Residual mass • Pseudoscalar and vector masses • Decay constants • Nucleons • Scaling • Summary and conclusions UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  3. Actions UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  4. Actions UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  5. Actions UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  6. Actions Domain wall height = M5 = 1.8 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  7. Actions UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  8. Actions mf = 4 dimensional bare quark mass Explicitly couples the s=0 and s=Ls-1 walls mixing the two chiralities UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  9. Actions UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  10. Actions UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  11. Actions DBW2 c1=-1.4069 Iwasaki c1=-0.331 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  12. QCDOC 163x32x8 2+1f datasets UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  13. QCDOC 163x32x8 2+1f datasets UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  14. QCDOC 163x32x8 2+1f datasets UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  15. Farmin’ • Search parameter space • Optimise physics output in shortest time scale • Thermalisation from start or existing R-algorithm ensemble • Datasets have 4 time planes per configuration • O(~4000) measurements for some quantities b=0.764 0.04/0.04 b=0.764 0.02/0.04 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  16. QCDOC 163x32x8 2+1f datasets UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  17. QCDOC 163x32x8 2+1f datasets UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  18. Datasets • First dynamical DWF 2+1 quark flavour ensembles • All ensembles generated with the RHMC algorithm • Volume = 163x32 with Ls=8 • Ensembles are amud=0.01/0.02/0.04, ams=0.04 and aM5=1.8 • Up to four valence quark masses on each ensemble • amf = 0.01,0.02,0.03,0.04 • Multiple time planes on several of the ensembles • Multiple smearings • point-point, wall-point, hydrogen-like wavefunction, doubly smeared at source • Integrated autocorrelation time for pseudoscalar meson measured to be ~100 trajectories • O(40K) trajectories and O(100K) measurements UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  19. Binning Local vector correlator b=0.764 mR=0.5 • Over sample & average into bins • 4 time-planes, 215 configs separated by 10 trajectories • Choose bin size 5-10 since tint ~ 100 trajectories • Full correlated analysis with binned data as input • Errors stabilise as bin size > tint as expected • Get independent data with low variance UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  20. Residual Mass mres • mres measures violation of chiral symmetry • Ls not infinite  L-R coupling between quark fields on walls • Define J5 in terms of fields at Ls/2 • mresfollows from Axial Ward-Takahashi Identity • Simultaneously fit to both point-point and smeared/wall-point Iwasaki b=2.13 2+1f UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  21. Chiral Extrapolation of mres Iwasaki b = 2.13 Shift quark mass amq = a( mf + mres(mf) ) UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  22. Chiral Extrapolation of mres Iwasaki b = 2.13 Shift quark mass amq = a( mf + mres(mf) ) Perform unitary extrapolation amq 0 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  23. Chiral Extrapolation of mres Iwasaki b = 2.13 Shift quark mass amq = a( mf + mres(mf) ) Perform unitary extrapolation amq 0 Do fit for DBW2 b = 0.72 or draw straight lines UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  24. Pseudoscalar and Vector mass fits • Perform a double cosh fit to both the excited and ground states where statistics allow • Removes systematic error in choice of fit range due to excited state • Simultaneously fit point-point and smeared-point correlators DBW2 b = 0.72 mud/ms=0.5 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  25. mPS chiral extrapolation and ams • Shift input quark masses amfamq=a( mf + mres(mf) ) • unitary extrapolation • Deviation from origin acceptable given low stats • Use Kaon mass in limit mud0 to give degenerate ams/2 DBW2 b = 0.72 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  26. mPS chiral extrapolation and ams • Shift input quark masses amfamq=a( mf + mres(mf) ) • unitary extrapolation • Miss the origin in some cases • Use Kaon mass in limit mud0 to give degenerate ams/2 DBW2 b = 0.72 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  27. Vector mass and lattice spacing DBW2 b = 0.78 • Lattice spacing from r mass in chiral limit (1.4  2.2 GeV-1 ) • K. Hashimoto, J. Noaki, T. Izubuchi - hep-lat/0510079 lattice spacing calculation from static potential • Only have degenerate quarks • amK* = A + B( ms/2 + ms/2 ) • Strange quark mass from previous slide UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  28. Volumes and lattice spacing DBW2 IW UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  29. Vector mass and lattice spacing DBW2 b = 0.78 • Lattice spacing from r mass in chiral limit (1.4  2.2 GeV-1 ) • K. Hashimoto, J. Noaki, Taku Izubuchi - hep-lat/0510079 lattice spacing calculation from static potential • Only have degenerate quarks • amK* = A + B( ms/2 + ms/2 ) • Strange quark mass from previous slide UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  30. Vector mass and lattice spacing DBW2 b = 0.78 • Lattice spacing from r mass in chiral limit (1.4  2.2 GeV-1 ) • K. Hashimoto, J. Noaki, Taku Izubuchi - hep-lat/0510079 lattice spacing calculation from static potential • Only have degenerate quarks • amK* = A + B( ms/2 + ms/2 ) • Strange quark mass from previous slide UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  31. Pseudoscalar decay constant • Calculate the pseudoscalar decay constant in two ways • Define as: • Using axial Ward-Takahashi identity • Require only the pseudoscalar correlator and mres • From the axial-axial correlator • Require calculation of ZA first • Both methods give equivalent results within errors Iwasaki b = 2.13 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  32. ZA calculation • Calculate ZA from the conserved and local axial current • Simultaneously fit both point-point and smeared/wall-point data Iwasaki b = 2.13 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  33. Pseudoscalar decay constant • Calculate the pseudoscalar decay constant in two ways • Define as: • Using axial Ward-Takahashi identity • Require only the pseudoscalar correlator and mres • From the axial-axial correlator • Require calculation of ZA first • Both methods give equivalent results within errors • fK using lattice spacing from amr and r0 Iwasaki b = 2.13 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  34. J parameter • Data from different actions and lattice spacings • J parameter defined by • Determined at experimental ratio UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  35. J parameter • Data from different actions and lattice spacings • J parameter defined by • Determined at experimental ratio UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  36. Scaling • Set the lattice spacing from r0 • Expect discretisation errors to be O(a2) • Errors will decrease with additional datasets allowing improved fitting to chiral extrapolations (rather than drawing straight lines) • Errors should decrease with increased statistics • Hint of scaling for two different gauge actions – looks better for Iwasaki than DBW2 fK/fPS UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  37. Scaling • Set the lattice spacing from r0 • Expect discretisation errors to be O(a2) • Errors will decrease with additional datasets allowing improved fitting to chiral extrapolations (rather than drawing straight lines) • Errors should decrease with increased statistics • Hint of scaling for two different gauge actions – looks better for Iwasaki than DBW2 fK/mr UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  38. Scaling • Set the lattice spacing from r0 • Expect discretisation errors to be O(a2) • Errors will decrease with additional datasets allowing improved fitting to chiral extrapolations (rather than drawing straight lines) • Errors should decrease with increased statistics • Hint of scaling for two different gauge actions – looks better for Iwasaki than DBW2 fp/mr UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  39. Scaling • Set the lattice spacing from r0 • Expect discretisation errors to be O(a2) • Errors will decrease with additional datasets allowing improved fitting to chiral extrapolations (rather than drawing straight lines) • Errors should decrease with increased statistics • Hint of scaling for two different gauge actions – looks better for Iwasaki than DBW2 mK*/mr UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  40. Nucleon operators • Standard Nucleon operator • Operator for negative parity partner • In finite box, backward propagating statehasopposite parity UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  41. Nucleon Effective mass plots DBW2 b=0.72 mR=½ Closed symbols: WL-WL-WL Open symbols: SL-SL-LL WN, WN(T-t),WN* UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  42. Chiral Extrapolation Only two sea quark masses Draw a straight line N, N* b=0.72, b=0.764 UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  43. Edinburgh plot • No extrapolations • Data follows phenomenological curve for both actions • Possible finite size effect for the lightest nucleon at IW b=2.2 (open square) UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  44. Nucleon scaling • Expect discretisation errors of O(a2) • Use r0to set the scale • Plot dimensionless quantities • Moderate scaling observed UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

  45. Summary and conclusions • Many ensembles created on QCDOC – some with limited statistics/small volumes • Only two quark masses for most b values – need third point to improve error estimates • Finite size effects • Ls = 8 too small – need increased Ls to decrease mres • Analysising 163x32 with Ls=16 (Dave Antonio’s talk) • Scaling unclear as errors are large • In production: Iwasaki b = 2.13, 243x64, Ls = 16 ensembles with 2+1 quark flavours and three quark mass values: 0.01/0.02/0.03 • Finite volume effects ? UKQCD meeting - Edinburgh

More Related